Cargando…

Comparison of freeze-dried tibialis anterior allograft and four-strand hamstring autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of the patients who underwent primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery with either hamstring autograft or freeze-dried tibialis anterior allograft, which performed by the same surgeon using the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Issın, Ahmet, Öner, Ali, Sofu, Hakan, Yurten, Hakan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6424693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30243835
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2018.08.001
_version_ 1783404710525403136
author Issın, Ahmet
Öner, Ali
Sofu, Hakan
Yurten, Hakan
author_facet Issın, Ahmet
Öner, Ali
Sofu, Hakan
Yurten, Hakan
author_sort Issın, Ahmet
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of the patients who underwent primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery with either hamstring autograft or freeze-dried tibialis anterior allograft, which performed by the same surgeon using the same fixation technique. METHODS: In this retrospective study, patients who had primary ACL reconstruction using either four-strand hamstring autograft (FSH) or freeze-dried irradiated tibialis anterior allograft (FDT) between 2012 and 2015 were evaluated. Patients who were skeletally mature with a minimum follow-up of 24 months and who had no previous surgery from the affected knee were included; patients who had multiple ligament injuries or chondral lesions over Outerbridge grade 2 were excluded from the study. Patients were grouped according to the graft type used in ACL reconstruction. Tegner activity scale and Lysholm knee scoring scale were used to assess patients' activity levels and functional status preoperatively and at the final follow-up. KT-2000 arthrometer measurements were done at the final follow-up to evaluate anterior laxity. RESULTS: There were 27 patients (mean age 27 ± 8.9 years) in the FSH group and 36 patients (mean age 27.1 ± 6.7 years) in the FDT group. The mean follow-up time was 38.2 ± 3.5 months for the FSH group and 41 ± 6.1 months for the FDT group. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups when preoperative and postoperative Tegner-Lysholm scores were compared (Tegner P = 0.583, 0.742; Lysholm P = 0.592, 0.249). The mean anteroposterior laxity and side-to-side differences measured by KT-2000 were 4.1 mm and 2.1 mm for the FSH group, respectively; 4.2 mm and 2.2 mm for the FDT group, respectively. There was not a statistically significant difference (P = 0.745, 0.562 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Primary ACL reconstruction with a single loop freeze-dried irradiated tibialis anterior allograft revealed comparable results with four-strand hamstring autograft in non-athlete patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Therapeutic study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6424693
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64246932019-03-28 Comparison of freeze-dried tibialis anterior allograft and four-strand hamstring autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Issın, Ahmet Öner, Ali Sofu, Hakan Yurten, Hakan Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc Research Paper PURPOSE: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of the patients who underwent primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery with either hamstring autograft or freeze-dried tibialis anterior allograft, which performed by the same surgeon using the same fixation technique. METHODS: In this retrospective study, patients who had primary ACL reconstruction using either four-strand hamstring autograft (FSH) or freeze-dried irradiated tibialis anterior allograft (FDT) between 2012 and 2015 were evaluated. Patients who were skeletally mature with a minimum follow-up of 24 months and who had no previous surgery from the affected knee were included; patients who had multiple ligament injuries or chondral lesions over Outerbridge grade 2 were excluded from the study. Patients were grouped according to the graft type used in ACL reconstruction. Tegner activity scale and Lysholm knee scoring scale were used to assess patients' activity levels and functional status preoperatively and at the final follow-up. KT-2000 arthrometer measurements were done at the final follow-up to evaluate anterior laxity. RESULTS: There were 27 patients (mean age 27 ± 8.9 years) in the FSH group and 36 patients (mean age 27.1 ± 6.7 years) in the FDT group. The mean follow-up time was 38.2 ± 3.5 months for the FSH group and 41 ± 6.1 months for the FDT group. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups when preoperative and postoperative Tegner-Lysholm scores were compared (Tegner P = 0.583, 0.742; Lysholm P = 0.592, 0.249). The mean anteroposterior laxity and side-to-side differences measured by KT-2000 were 4.1 mm and 2.1 mm for the FSH group, respectively; 4.2 mm and 2.2 mm for the FDT group, respectively. There was not a statistically significant difference (P = 0.745, 0.562 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Primary ACL reconstruction with a single loop freeze-dried irradiated tibialis anterior allograft revealed comparable results with four-strand hamstring autograft in non-athlete patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Therapeutic study. Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2019-01 2018-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6424693/ /pubmed/30243835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2018.08.001 Text en © 2018 Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Paper
Issın, Ahmet
Öner, Ali
Sofu, Hakan
Yurten, Hakan
Comparison of freeze-dried tibialis anterior allograft and four-strand hamstring autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
title Comparison of freeze-dried tibialis anterior allograft and four-strand hamstring autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
title_full Comparison of freeze-dried tibialis anterior allograft and four-strand hamstring autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
title_fullStr Comparison of freeze-dried tibialis anterior allograft and four-strand hamstring autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of freeze-dried tibialis anterior allograft and four-strand hamstring autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
title_short Comparison of freeze-dried tibialis anterior allograft and four-strand hamstring autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
title_sort comparison of freeze-dried tibialis anterior allograft and four-strand hamstring autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6424693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30243835
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2018.08.001
work_keys_str_mv AT issınahmet comparisonoffreezedriedtibialisanteriorallograftandfourstrandhamstringautograftinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT onerali comparisonoffreezedriedtibialisanteriorallograftandfourstrandhamstringautograftinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT sofuhakan comparisonoffreezedriedtibialisanteriorallograftandfourstrandhamstringautograftinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT yurtenhakan comparisonoffreezedriedtibialisanteriorallograftandfourstrandhamstringautograftinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction