Cargando…

Hamstring Tendon Autograft Contamination in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison between two Harvesting Techniques

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the contamination rate of hamstring tendon autografts by comparing two different techniques, and to verify whether intraoperative contamination is associated with the development of clinical infection in patients submitted to reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Temponi, Eduardo Frois, Marques da Costa, Luís Henrique Grassi, Soares, Luiz Fernando Machado, Carvalho Júnior, Lúcio Honório de
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. Published by Thieme Revnter Publicações Ltda 2019
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6424811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31363242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbo.2017.09.008
_version_ 1783404718495629312
author Temponi, Eduardo Frois
Marques da Costa, Luís Henrique Grassi
Soares, Luiz Fernando Machado
Carvalho Júnior, Lúcio Honório de
author_facet Temponi, Eduardo Frois
Marques da Costa, Luís Henrique Grassi
Soares, Luiz Fernando Machado
Carvalho Júnior, Lúcio Honório de
author_sort Temponi, Eduardo Frois
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the contamination rate of hamstring tendon autografts by comparing two different techniques, and to verify whether intraoperative contamination is associated with the development of clinical infection in patients submitted to reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). METHODS: A total of 110 hamstring tendon autograft ACL reconstructions were performed and divided into two groups: 1–hamstring tendon retraction technique; and 2 - technique maintaining the tibial insertion of the hamstring tendon. During the preparation, two graft fragments were sent for culturing; the harvesting time, the preparation time, and the total surgery time were measured. Twenty-four hours after the surgery, the C-reactive protein was assayed. The clinical outpatient follow-up was performed up to 180 days postoperatively. RESULTS: Although there were two postoperative infections, there was no graft contamination or difference between the groups in relation to the graft preparation time and to the 24-hour postoperative C-reactive protein assessment. The classic technique presented a longer graft harvesting time ( p  = 0.038), and there was no statistical difference between the 2 groups regarding the degree of contamination and consequent clinical infection, although 2 patients in group 2 presented with infection, with negative perioperative cultures. CONCLUSION: Based on the results obtained, there was no association between graft contamination and the time or technique of its preparation. In addition, there was also no association between intraoperative contamination and the development of clinical infection, nor was there any sign of an association between the early alteration of C-reactive protein and the onset of infection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6424811
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. Published by Thieme Revnter Publicações Ltda
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64248112019-07-29 Hamstring Tendon Autograft Contamination in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison between two Harvesting Techniques Temponi, Eduardo Frois Marques da Costa, Luís Henrique Grassi Soares, Luiz Fernando Machado Carvalho Júnior, Lúcio Honório de Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the contamination rate of hamstring tendon autografts by comparing two different techniques, and to verify whether intraoperative contamination is associated with the development of clinical infection in patients submitted to reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). METHODS: A total of 110 hamstring tendon autograft ACL reconstructions were performed and divided into two groups: 1–hamstring tendon retraction technique; and 2 - technique maintaining the tibial insertion of the hamstring tendon. During the preparation, two graft fragments were sent for culturing; the harvesting time, the preparation time, and the total surgery time were measured. Twenty-four hours after the surgery, the C-reactive protein was assayed. The clinical outpatient follow-up was performed up to 180 days postoperatively. RESULTS: Although there were two postoperative infections, there was no graft contamination or difference between the groups in relation to the graft preparation time and to the 24-hour postoperative C-reactive protein assessment. The classic technique presented a longer graft harvesting time ( p  = 0.038), and there was no statistical difference between the 2 groups regarding the degree of contamination and consequent clinical infection, although 2 patients in group 2 presented with infection, with negative perioperative cultures. CONCLUSION: Based on the results obtained, there was no association between graft contamination and the time or technique of its preparation. In addition, there was also no association between intraoperative contamination and the development of clinical infection, nor was there any sign of an association between the early alteration of C-reactive protein and the onset of infection. Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. Published by Thieme Revnter Publicações Ltda 2019-02 2019-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6424811/ /pubmed/31363242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbo.2017.09.008 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Temponi, Eduardo Frois
Marques da Costa, Luís Henrique Grassi
Soares, Luiz Fernando Machado
Carvalho Júnior, Lúcio Honório de
Hamstring Tendon Autograft Contamination in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison between two Harvesting Techniques
title Hamstring Tendon Autograft Contamination in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison between two Harvesting Techniques
title_full Hamstring Tendon Autograft Contamination in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison between two Harvesting Techniques
title_fullStr Hamstring Tendon Autograft Contamination in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison between two Harvesting Techniques
title_full_unstemmed Hamstring Tendon Autograft Contamination in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison between two Harvesting Techniques
title_short Hamstring Tendon Autograft Contamination in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison between two Harvesting Techniques
title_sort hamstring tendon autograft contamination in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison between two harvesting techniques
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6424811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31363242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbo.2017.09.008
work_keys_str_mv AT temponieduardofrois hamstringtendonautograftcontaminationinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioncomparisonbetweentwoharvestingtechniques
AT marquesdacostaluishenriquegrassi hamstringtendonautograftcontaminationinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioncomparisonbetweentwoharvestingtechniques
AT soaresluizfernandomachado hamstringtendonautograftcontaminationinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioncomparisonbetweentwoharvestingtechniques
AT carvalhojuniorluciohonoriode hamstringtendonautograftcontaminationinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioncomparisonbetweentwoharvestingtechniques