Cargando…
Hamstring Tendon Autograft Contamination in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison between two Harvesting Techniques
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the contamination rate of hamstring tendon autografts by comparing two different techniques, and to verify whether intraoperative contamination is associated with the development of clinical infection in patients submitted to reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (A...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. Published by Thieme Revnter Publicações Ltda
2019
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6424811/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31363242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbo.2017.09.008 |
_version_ | 1783404718495629312 |
---|---|
author | Temponi, Eduardo Frois Marques da Costa, Luís Henrique Grassi Soares, Luiz Fernando Machado Carvalho Júnior, Lúcio Honório de |
author_facet | Temponi, Eduardo Frois Marques da Costa, Luís Henrique Grassi Soares, Luiz Fernando Machado Carvalho Júnior, Lúcio Honório de |
author_sort | Temponi, Eduardo Frois |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the contamination rate of hamstring tendon autografts by comparing two different techniques, and to verify whether intraoperative contamination is associated with the development of clinical infection in patients submitted to reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). METHODS: A total of 110 hamstring tendon autograft ACL reconstructions were performed and divided into two groups: 1–hamstring tendon retraction technique; and 2 - technique maintaining the tibial insertion of the hamstring tendon. During the preparation, two graft fragments were sent for culturing; the harvesting time, the preparation time, and the total surgery time were measured. Twenty-four hours after the surgery, the C-reactive protein was assayed. The clinical outpatient follow-up was performed up to 180 days postoperatively. RESULTS: Although there were two postoperative infections, there was no graft contamination or difference between the groups in relation to the graft preparation time and to the 24-hour postoperative C-reactive protein assessment. The classic technique presented a longer graft harvesting time ( p = 0.038), and there was no statistical difference between the 2 groups regarding the degree of contamination and consequent clinical infection, although 2 patients in group 2 presented with infection, with negative perioperative cultures. CONCLUSION: Based on the results obtained, there was no association between graft contamination and the time or technique of its preparation. In addition, there was also no association between intraoperative contamination and the development of clinical infection, nor was there any sign of an association between the early alteration of C-reactive protein and the onset of infection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6424811 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. Published by Thieme Revnter Publicações Ltda |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64248112019-07-29 Hamstring Tendon Autograft Contamination in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison between two Harvesting Techniques Temponi, Eduardo Frois Marques da Costa, Luís Henrique Grassi Soares, Luiz Fernando Machado Carvalho Júnior, Lúcio Honório de Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the contamination rate of hamstring tendon autografts by comparing two different techniques, and to verify whether intraoperative contamination is associated with the development of clinical infection in patients submitted to reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). METHODS: A total of 110 hamstring tendon autograft ACL reconstructions were performed and divided into two groups: 1–hamstring tendon retraction technique; and 2 - technique maintaining the tibial insertion of the hamstring tendon. During the preparation, two graft fragments were sent for culturing; the harvesting time, the preparation time, and the total surgery time were measured. Twenty-four hours after the surgery, the C-reactive protein was assayed. The clinical outpatient follow-up was performed up to 180 days postoperatively. RESULTS: Although there were two postoperative infections, there was no graft contamination or difference between the groups in relation to the graft preparation time and to the 24-hour postoperative C-reactive protein assessment. The classic technique presented a longer graft harvesting time ( p = 0.038), and there was no statistical difference between the 2 groups regarding the degree of contamination and consequent clinical infection, although 2 patients in group 2 presented with infection, with negative perioperative cultures. CONCLUSION: Based on the results obtained, there was no association between graft contamination and the time or technique of its preparation. In addition, there was also no association between intraoperative contamination and the development of clinical infection, nor was there any sign of an association between the early alteration of C-reactive protein and the onset of infection. Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. Published by Thieme Revnter Publicações Ltda 2019-02 2019-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6424811/ /pubmed/31363242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbo.2017.09.008 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Temponi, Eduardo Frois Marques da Costa, Luís Henrique Grassi Soares, Luiz Fernando Machado Carvalho Júnior, Lúcio Honório de Hamstring Tendon Autograft Contamination in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison between two Harvesting Techniques |
title |
Hamstring Tendon Autograft Contamination in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison between two Harvesting Techniques
|
title_full |
Hamstring Tendon Autograft Contamination in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison between two Harvesting Techniques
|
title_fullStr |
Hamstring Tendon Autograft Contamination in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison between two Harvesting Techniques
|
title_full_unstemmed |
Hamstring Tendon Autograft Contamination in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison between two Harvesting Techniques
|
title_short |
Hamstring Tendon Autograft Contamination in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison between two Harvesting Techniques
|
title_sort | hamstring tendon autograft contamination in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison between two harvesting techniques |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6424811/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31363242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbo.2017.09.008 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT temponieduardofrois hamstringtendonautograftcontaminationinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioncomparisonbetweentwoharvestingtechniques AT marquesdacostaluishenriquegrassi hamstringtendonautograftcontaminationinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioncomparisonbetweentwoharvestingtechniques AT soaresluizfernandomachado hamstringtendonautograftcontaminationinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioncomparisonbetweentwoharvestingtechniques AT carvalhojuniorluciohonoriode hamstringtendonautograftcontaminationinanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructioncomparisonbetweentwoharvestingtechniques |