Cargando…

A multi-institutional analysis of sequential versus ‘sandwich’ adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the outcomes of sequential or sandwich chemotherapy (ChT) and radiotherapy (RT) in patients with node-positive endometrial cancer (EC). METHODS: Data from 4 centers were collected retrospectively for 179 patients with stage IIIC EC treated with postoperative RT and ChT (paclita...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Onal, Cem, Sari, Sezin Yuce, Yildirim, Berna Akkus, Yavas, Guler, Gultekin, Melis, Guler, Ozan Cem, Akyurek, Serap, Yildiz, Ferah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6424855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30887753
http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e28
_version_ 1783404728829345792
author Onal, Cem
Sari, Sezin Yuce
Yildirim, Berna Akkus
Yavas, Guler
Gultekin, Melis
Guler, Ozan Cem
Akyurek, Serap
Yildiz, Ferah
author_facet Onal, Cem
Sari, Sezin Yuce
Yildirim, Berna Akkus
Yavas, Guler
Gultekin, Melis
Guler, Ozan Cem
Akyurek, Serap
Yildiz, Ferah
author_sort Onal, Cem
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To analyze the outcomes of sequential or sandwich chemotherapy (ChT) and radiotherapy (RT) in patients with node-positive endometrial cancer (EC). METHODS: Data from 4 centers were collected retrospectively for 179 patients with stage IIIC EC treated with postoperative RT and ChT (paclitaxel and carboplatin). Patients were either treated with 6 cycles of ChT followed by RT (sequential arm; 96 patients) or with 3 cycles of ChT, RT, and an additional 3 cycles of ChT (sandwich arm; 83 patients). Prognostic factors affecting overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed. RESULTS: The 5-year OS and PFS rates were 64% and 59%, respectively, with a median follow-up of 41 months (range, 5–167 months). The 5-year OS rates were significantly higher in the sandwich than sequential arms (74% vs. 56%; p=0.03) and the difference for 5-year PFS rates was nearly significant (65% vs. 54%; p=0.05). In univariate analysis, treatment strategy, age, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, pathology, rate of myometrial invasion, and grade were prognostic factors for OS and PFS. In multivariate analysis, non-endometrioid histology, advanced FIGO stage, and adjuvant sequential ChT and RT were negative predictors for OS, whereas only non-endometrioid histology was a prognostic factor for PFS. CONCLUSION: Postoperative adjuvant ChT and RT for stage IIIC EC patients, either given sequentially or sandwiched, offers excellent clinical efficacy and acceptably low toxicity. Our data support the superiority of the sandwich regimen compared to the sequential strategy in stage IIIC EC patients for OS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6424855
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64248552019-05-01 A multi-institutional analysis of sequential versus ‘sandwich’ adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma Onal, Cem Sari, Sezin Yuce Yildirim, Berna Akkus Yavas, Guler Gultekin, Melis Guler, Ozan Cem Akyurek, Serap Yildiz, Ferah J Gynecol Oncol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To analyze the outcomes of sequential or sandwich chemotherapy (ChT) and radiotherapy (RT) in patients with node-positive endometrial cancer (EC). METHODS: Data from 4 centers were collected retrospectively for 179 patients with stage IIIC EC treated with postoperative RT and ChT (paclitaxel and carboplatin). Patients were either treated with 6 cycles of ChT followed by RT (sequential arm; 96 patients) or with 3 cycles of ChT, RT, and an additional 3 cycles of ChT (sandwich arm; 83 patients). Prognostic factors affecting overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed. RESULTS: The 5-year OS and PFS rates were 64% and 59%, respectively, with a median follow-up of 41 months (range, 5–167 months). The 5-year OS rates were significantly higher in the sandwich than sequential arms (74% vs. 56%; p=0.03) and the difference for 5-year PFS rates was nearly significant (65% vs. 54%; p=0.05). In univariate analysis, treatment strategy, age, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, pathology, rate of myometrial invasion, and grade were prognostic factors for OS and PFS. In multivariate analysis, non-endometrioid histology, advanced FIGO stage, and adjuvant sequential ChT and RT were negative predictors for OS, whereas only non-endometrioid histology was a prognostic factor for PFS. CONCLUSION: Postoperative adjuvant ChT and RT for stage IIIC EC patients, either given sequentially or sandwiched, offers excellent clinical efficacy and acceptably low toxicity. Our data support the superiority of the sandwich regimen compared to the sequential strategy in stage IIIC EC patients for OS. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2018-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6424855/ /pubmed/30887753 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e28 Text en Copyright © 2019. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Onal, Cem
Sari, Sezin Yuce
Yildirim, Berna Akkus
Yavas, Guler
Gultekin, Melis
Guler, Ozan Cem
Akyurek, Serap
Yildiz, Ferah
A multi-institutional analysis of sequential versus ‘sandwich’ adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma
title A multi-institutional analysis of sequential versus ‘sandwich’ adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma
title_full A multi-institutional analysis of sequential versus ‘sandwich’ adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma
title_fullStr A multi-institutional analysis of sequential versus ‘sandwich’ adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed A multi-institutional analysis of sequential versus ‘sandwich’ adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma
title_short A multi-institutional analysis of sequential versus ‘sandwich’ adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma
title_sort multi-institutional analysis of sequential versus ‘sandwich’ adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for stage iiic endometrial carcinoma
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6424855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30887753
http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e28
work_keys_str_mv AT onalcem amultiinstitutionalanalysisofsequentialversussandwichadjuvantchemotherapyandradiotherapyforstageiiicendometrialcarcinoma
AT sarisezinyuce amultiinstitutionalanalysisofsequentialversussandwichadjuvantchemotherapyandradiotherapyforstageiiicendometrialcarcinoma
AT yildirimbernaakkus amultiinstitutionalanalysisofsequentialversussandwichadjuvantchemotherapyandradiotherapyforstageiiicendometrialcarcinoma
AT yavasguler amultiinstitutionalanalysisofsequentialversussandwichadjuvantchemotherapyandradiotherapyforstageiiicendometrialcarcinoma
AT gultekinmelis amultiinstitutionalanalysisofsequentialversussandwichadjuvantchemotherapyandradiotherapyforstageiiicendometrialcarcinoma
AT gulerozancem amultiinstitutionalanalysisofsequentialversussandwichadjuvantchemotherapyandradiotherapyforstageiiicendometrialcarcinoma
AT akyurekserap amultiinstitutionalanalysisofsequentialversussandwichadjuvantchemotherapyandradiotherapyforstageiiicendometrialcarcinoma
AT yildizferah amultiinstitutionalanalysisofsequentialversussandwichadjuvantchemotherapyandradiotherapyforstageiiicendometrialcarcinoma
AT onalcem multiinstitutionalanalysisofsequentialversussandwichadjuvantchemotherapyandradiotherapyforstageiiicendometrialcarcinoma
AT sarisezinyuce multiinstitutionalanalysisofsequentialversussandwichadjuvantchemotherapyandradiotherapyforstageiiicendometrialcarcinoma
AT yildirimbernaakkus multiinstitutionalanalysisofsequentialversussandwichadjuvantchemotherapyandradiotherapyforstageiiicendometrialcarcinoma
AT yavasguler multiinstitutionalanalysisofsequentialversussandwichadjuvantchemotherapyandradiotherapyforstageiiicendometrialcarcinoma
AT gultekinmelis multiinstitutionalanalysisofsequentialversussandwichadjuvantchemotherapyandradiotherapyforstageiiicendometrialcarcinoma
AT gulerozancem multiinstitutionalanalysisofsequentialversussandwichadjuvantchemotherapyandradiotherapyforstageiiicendometrialcarcinoma
AT akyurekserap multiinstitutionalanalysisofsequentialversussandwichadjuvantchemotherapyandradiotherapyforstageiiicendometrialcarcinoma
AT yildizferah multiinstitutionalanalysisofsequentialversussandwichadjuvantchemotherapyandradiotherapyforstageiiicendometrialcarcinoma