Cargando…
A multi-institutional analysis of sequential versus ‘sandwich’ adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the outcomes of sequential or sandwich chemotherapy (ChT) and radiotherapy (RT) in patients with node-positive endometrial cancer (EC). METHODS: Data from 4 centers were collected retrospectively for 179 patients with stage IIIC EC treated with postoperative RT and ChT (paclita...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6424855/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30887753 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e28 |
_version_ | 1783404728829345792 |
---|---|
author | Onal, Cem Sari, Sezin Yuce Yildirim, Berna Akkus Yavas, Guler Gultekin, Melis Guler, Ozan Cem Akyurek, Serap Yildiz, Ferah |
author_facet | Onal, Cem Sari, Sezin Yuce Yildirim, Berna Akkus Yavas, Guler Gultekin, Melis Guler, Ozan Cem Akyurek, Serap Yildiz, Ferah |
author_sort | Onal, Cem |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To analyze the outcomes of sequential or sandwich chemotherapy (ChT) and radiotherapy (RT) in patients with node-positive endometrial cancer (EC). METHODS: Data from 4 centers were collected retrospectively for 179 patients with stage IIIC EC treated with postoperative RT and ChT (paclitaxel and carboplatin). Patients were either treated with 6 cycles of ChT followed by RT (sequential arm; 96 patients) or with 3 cycles of ChT, RT, and an additional 3 cycles of ChT (sandwich arm; 83 patients). Prognostic factors affecting overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed. RESULTS: The 5-year OS and PFS rates were 64% and 59%, respectively, with a median follow-up of 41 months (range, 5–167 months). The 5-year OS rates were significantly higher in the sandwich than sequential arms (74% vs. 56%; p=0.03) and the difference for 5-year PFS rates was nearly significant (65% vs. 54%; p=0.05). In univariate analysis, treatment strategy, age, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, pathology, rate of myometrial invasion, and grade were prognostic factors for OS and PFS. In multivariate analysis, non-endometrioid histology, advanced FIGO stage, and adjuvant sequential ChT and RT were negative predictors for OS, whereas only non-endometrioid histology was a prognostic factor for PFS. CONCLUSION: Postoperative adjuvant ChT and RT for stage IIIC EC patients, either given sequentially or sandwiched, offers excellent clinical efficacy and acceptably low toxicity. Our data support the superiority of the sandwich regimen compared to the sequential strategy in stage IIIC EC patients for OS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6424855 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64248552019-05-01 A multi-institutional analysis of sequential versus ‘sandwich’ adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma Onal, Cem Sari, Sezin Yuce Yildirim, Berna Akkus Yavas, Guler Gultekin, Melis Guler, Ozan Cem Akyurek, Serap Yildiz, Ferah J Gynecol Oncol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To analyze the outcomes of sequential or sandwich chemotherapy (ChT) and radiotherapy (RT) in patients with node-positive endometrial cancer (EC). METHODS: Data from 4 centers were collected retrospectively for 179 patients with stage IIIC EC treated with postoperative RT and ChT (paclitaxel and carboplatin). Patients were either treated with 6 cycles of ChT followed by RT (sequential arm; 96 patients) or with 3 cycles of ChT, RT, and an additional 3 cycles of ChT (sandwich arm; 83 patients). Prognostic factors affecting overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed. RESULTS: The 5-year OS and PFS rates were 64% and 59%, respectively, with a median follow-up of 41 months (range, 5–167 months). The 5-year OS rates were significantly higher in the sandwich than sequential arms (74% vs. 56%; p=0.03) and the difference for 5-year PFS rates was nearly significant (65% vs. 54%; p=0.05). In univariate analysis, treatment strategy, age, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, pathology, rate of myometrial invasion, and grade were prognostic factors for OS and PFS. In multivariate analysis, non-endometrioid histology, advanced FIGO stage, and adjuvant sequential ChT and RT were negative predictors for OS, whereas only non-endometrioid histology was a prognostic factor for PFS. CONCLUSION: Postoperative adjuvant ChT and RT for stage IIIC EC patients, either given sequentially or sandwiched, offers excellent clinical efficacy and acceptably low toxicity. Our data support the superiority of the sandwich regimen compared to the sequential strategy in stage IIIC EC patients for OS. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2018-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6424855/ /pubmed/30887753 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e28 Text en Copyright © 2019. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Onal, Cem Sari, Sezin Yuce Yildirim, Berna Akkus Yavas, Guler Gultekin, Melis Guler, Ozan Cem Akyurek, Serap Yildiz, Ferah A multi-institutional analysis of sequential versus ‘sandwich’ adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma |
title | A multi-institutional analysis of sequential versus ‘sandwich’ adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma |
title_full | A multi-institutional analysis of sequential versus ‘sandwich’ adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma |
title_fullStr | A multi-institutional analysis of sequential versus ‘sandwich’ adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | A multi-institutional analysis of sequential versus ‘sandwich’ adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma |
title_short | A multi-institutional analysis of sequential versus ‘sandwich’ adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma |
title_sort | multi-institutional analysis of sequential versus ‘sandwich’ adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for stage iiic endometrial carcinoma |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6424855/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30887753 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e28 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT onalcem amultiinstitutionalanalysisofsequentialversussandwichadjuvantchemotherapyandradiotherapyforstageiiicendometrialcarcinoma AT sarisezinyuce amultiinstitutionalanalysisofsequentialversussandwichadjuvantchemotherapyandradiotherapyforstageiiicendometrialcarcinoma AT yildirimbernaakkus amultiinstitutionalanalysisofsequentialversussandwichadjuvantchemotherapyandradiotherapyforstageiiicendometrialcarcinoma AT yavasguler amultiinstitutionalanalysisofsequentialversussandwichadjuvantchemotherapyandradiotherapyforstageiiicendometrialcarcinoma AT gultekinmelis amultiinstitutionalanalysisofsequentialversussandwichadjuvantchemotherapyandradiotherapyforstageiiicendometrialcarcinoma AT gulerozancem amultiinstitutionalanalysisofsequentialversussandwichadjuvantchemotherapyandradiotherapyforstageiiicendometrialcarcinoma AT akyurekserap amultiinstitutionalanalysisofsequentialversussandwichadjuvantchemotherapyandradiotherapyforstageiiicendometrialcarcinoma AT yildizferah amultiinstitutionalanalysisofsequentialversussandwichadjuvantchemotherapyandradiotherapyforstageiiicendometrialcarcinoma AT onalcem multiinstitutionalanalysisofsequentialversussandwichadjuvantchemotherapyandradiotherapyforstageiiicendometrialcarcinoma AT sarisezinyuce multiinstitutionalanalysisofsequentialversussandwichadjuvantchemotherapyandradiotherapyforstageiiicendometrialcarcinoma AT yildirimbernaakkus multiinstitutionalanalysisofsequentialversussandwichadjuvantchemotherapyandradiotherapyforstageiiicendometrialcarcinoma AT yavasguler multiinstitutionalanalysisofsequentialversussandwichadjuvantchemotherapyandradiotherapyforstageiiicendometrialcarcinoma AT gultekinmelis multiinstitutionalanalysisofsequentialversussandwichadjuvantchemotherapyandradiotherapyforstageiiicendometrialcarcinoma AT gulerozancem multiinstitutionalanalysisofsequentialversussandwichadjuvantchemotherapyandradiotherapyforstageiiicendometrialcarcinoma AT akyurekserap multiinstitutionalanalysisofsequentialversussandwichadjuvantchemotherapyandradiotherapyforstageiiicendometrialcarcinoma AT yildizferah multiinstitutionalanalysisofsequentialversussandwichadjuvantchemotherapyandradiotherapyforstageiiicendometrialcarcinoma |