Long-Term Follow-Up Examination of the Internal Jugular Vein After Vessel-Sparing Implantation of a Hickman Catheter or Port Catheter

Introduction: Both a Hickman catheter (HC) and port catheter (Port) can be inserted either percutaneously by the Seldinger technique or by surgical venous cut-down. Catheters are inserted with a vessel-sparing technique when they are placed in the internal jugular vein (IJV) by venous cut-down. Although this technique is common, data are sparse regarding the vessel's state at long-term follow-up. This study was aimed at determining the flow pattern and constitution of the IJV after vessel-sparing implantation of an HC or Port and comparing the outcomes to those of implantation with the Seldinger technique. Methods: One hundred children (58 boys, 42 girls) between 33 days and 18 years of age who underwent a vessel-sparing implantation of an HC or Port in the IJV were prospectively included. All patients underwent surgical venous cut-down at a single institution. Patency and shape of the IJV were determined by ultrasound and categorized according to 2 possible outcomes: relevant alteration (including occlusion of the IJV) and no relevant alteration, with relevant alteration defined as changes that caused an altered flow pattern. Results: Median age was 6 years at the time of operation, and the median indwelling time of catheters was 271 days. Twenty-two of our patients (22%) showed relevant alterations. These changes included high-grade stenosis or lesion in 13 patients (13%) and occlusion in 9 patients (9%). There were no operation-associated complications, such as pneumothorax, hematopericardium, or accidental puncture of the carotid artery. Statistical analysis did not reveal any specific parameter as a risk factor for relevant structural abnormalities. Discussion: In a comparison of our data to the literature, venous cut-down showed an alteration rate of 26% and a patency rate of 85%, whereas the Seldinger technique was found to cause alteration in 15%, with a patency rate of 97% but a successful placement rate of only 90.3–91.6%. Conclusion: The indication for long-term catheter placement may determine which method is preferable. A child who is likely to need more catheters in the future might benefit from the Seldinger technique, since there is a higher chance of long-term patency of the vessel. A patient undergoing chemotherapy might benefit more from the surgical venous cut-down with less placement-associated complications.