Cargando…

Comparing the Efficacy of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation in Early Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Infants

OBJECTIVES: There is a tendency to use noninvasive ventilation (NIV) as a substitute for mechanical ventilation in preterm infants who need respiratory support. Two important modes of NIV include nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) and nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gharehbaghi, Manizheh Mostafa, Hosseini, Mohammad Bagher, Eivazi, Ghodratollah, Yasrebinia, Sanaz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: OMJ 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6425044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30918602
http://dx.doi.org/10.5001/omj.2019.20
_version_ 1783404772450107392
author Gharehbaghi, Manizheh Mostafa
Hosseini, Mohammad Bagher
Eivazi, Ghodratollah
Yasrebinia, Sanaz
author_facet Gharehbaghi, Manizheh Mostafa
Hosseini, Mohammad Bagher
Eivazi, Ghodratollah
Yasrebinia, Sanaz
author_sort Gharehbaghi, Manizheh Mostafa
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: There is a tendency to use noninvasive ventilation (NIV) as a substitute for mechanical ventilation in preterm infants who need respiratory support. Two important modes of NIV include nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) and nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV). We sought to compare the efficacy of NCPAP and NIPPV as early respiratory support in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome in reducing the need for intubation, surfactant administration, and mechanical ventilation. METHODS: We conducted a randomized clinical trial. Sixty-one preterm infants with a gestational age of 28–32 weeks and a birth weight < 1500 g were randomly allocated to early NCPAP (n = 31) or NIPPV (n = 30) groups. The primary outcome was the need for intubation and mechanical ventilation in first 72 hours of life and the secondary outcome was oxygen dependency beyond day 28 post-birth. RESULTS: Surfactant replacement therapy was done in 15 neonates (50.0%) in the NIPPV group and 19 neonates (61.3%) in the NCPAP group, odds ratio (OR) = 1.58 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.57–4.37; p = 0.370). Intubation and mechanical ventilation in the first 72 hours of life were needed in five cases (16.7%) in the NIPPV group and two cases (6.5%) in the NCPAP group, OR = 2.90 (95% CI: 0.51–16.27; p = 0.250). The mean duration of hospitalization was 26.2±17.4 days in the NIPPV group and 38.4±19.2 days in the NCPAP group, p = 0.009. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) occurred in two (6.7%) neonates in the NIPPV group and eight (25.8%) neonates in the NCPAP group, p = 0.080. CONCLUSIONS: NIPPV and NCPAP are similarly effective as initial respiratory support in preterm infants in reducing the need for mechanical ventilation and occurrence of BPD. The duration of hospitalization was significantly reduced using NIPPV in our study. KEYWORDS: Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure; Preterm Infants; Mechanical Ventilation; Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia; Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6425044
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher OMJ
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64250442019-03-27 Comparing the Efficacy of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation in Early Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Infants Gharehbaghi, Manizheh Mostafa Hosseini, Mohammad Bagher Eivazi, Ghodratollah Yasrebinia, Sanaz Oman Med J Original Articles OBJECTIVES: There is a tendency to use noninvasive ventilation (NIV) as a substitute for mechanical ventilation in preterm infants who need respiratory support. Two important modes of NIV include nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) and nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV). We sought to compare the efficacy of NCPAP and NIPPV as early respiratory support in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome in reducing the need for intubation, surfactant administration, and mechanical ventilation. METHODS: We conducted a randomized clinical trial. Sixty-one preterm infants with a gestational age of 28–32 weeks and a birth weight < 1500 g were randomly allocated to early NCPAP (n = 31) or NIPPV (n = 30) groups. The primary outcome was the need for intubation and mechanical ventilation in first 72 hours of life and the secondary outcome was oxygen dependency beyond day 28 post-birth. RESULTS: Surfactant replacement therapy was done in 15 neonates (50.0%) in the NIPPV group and 19 neonates (61.3%) in the NCPAP group, odds ratio (OR) = 1.58 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.57–4.37; p = 0.370). Intubation and mechanical ventilation in the first 72 hours of life were needed in five cases (16.7%) in the NIPPV group and two cases (6.5%) in the NCPAP group, OR = 2.90 (95% CI: 0.51–16.27; p = 0.250). The mean duration of hospitalization was 26.2±17.4 days in the NIPPV group and 38.4±19.2 days in the NCPAP group, p = 0.009. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) occurred in two (6.7%) neonates in the NIPPV group and eight (25.8%) neonates in the NCPAP group, p = 0.080. CONCLUSIONS: NIPPV and NCPAP are similarly effective as initial respiratory support in preterm infants in reducing the need for mechanical ventilation and occurrence of BPD. The duration of hospitalization was significantly reduced using NIPPV in our study. KEYWORDS: Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure; Preterm Infants; Mechanical Ventilation; Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia; Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn. OMJ 2019-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6425044/ /pubmed/30918602 http://dx.doi.org/10.5001/omj.2019.20 Text en The OMJ is Published Bimonthly and Copyrighted 2019 by the OMSB. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Gharehbaghi, Manizheh Mostafa
Hosseini, Mohammad Bagher
Eivazi, Ghodratollah
Yasrebinia, Sanaz
Comparing the Efficacy of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation in Early Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Infants
title Comparing the Efficacy of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation in Early Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Infants
title_full Comparing the Efficacy of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation in Early Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Infants
title_fullStr Comparing the Efficacy of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation in Early Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Infants
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the Efficacy of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation in Early Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Infants
title_short Comparing the Efficacy of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation in Early Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Infants
title_sort comparing the efficacy of nasal continuous positive airway pressure and nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in early management of respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6425044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30918602
http://dx.doi.org/10.5001/omj.2019.20
work_keys_str_mv AT gharehbaghimanizhehmostafa comparingtheefficacyofnasalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressureandnasalintermittentpositivepressureventilationinearlymanagementofrespiratorydistresssyndromeinpreterminfants
AT hosseinimohammadbagher comparingtheefficacyofnasalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressureandnasalintermittentpositivepressureventilationinearlymanagementofrespiratorydistresssyndromeinpreterminfants
AT eivazighodratollah comparingtheefficacyofnasalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressureandnasalintermittentpositivepressureventilationinearlymanagementofrespiratorydistresssyndromeinpreterminfants
AT yasrebiniasanaz comparingtheefficacyofnasalcontinuouspositiveairwaypressureandnasalintermittentpositivepressureventilationinearlymanagementofrespiratorydistresssyndromeinpreterminfants