Cargando…

Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery in Lateral Lymph Node Dissection for Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

AIM: To compare the clinical efficacies between laparoscopic and conventional open surgery in lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) for advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: We comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang Data and performed a cumulative meta-analysis. Accor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ouyang, Manzhao, Liao, Tianyou, Lu, Yan, Deng, Leilei, Luo, Zhentao, Wu, Jinhao, Ju, Yongle, Yao, Xueqing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6425322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30956657
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/7689082
_version_ 1783404820187578368
author Ouyang, Manzhao
Liao, Tianyou
Lu, Yan
Deng, Leilei
Luo, Zhentao
Wu, Jinhao
Ju, Yongle
Yao, Xueqing
author_facet Ouyang, Manzhao
Liao, Tianyou
Lu, Yan
Deng, Leilei
Luo, Zhentao
Wu, Jinhao
Ju, Yongle
Yao, Xueqing
author_sort Ouyang, Manzhao
collection PubMed
description AIM: To compare the clinical efficacies between laparoscopic and conventional open surgery in lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) for advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: We comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang Data and performed a cumulative meta-analysis. According to inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria, all eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or retrospective or prospective comparative studies assessing the two techniques were included, and then a meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software to assess the difference in clinical and oncological outcomes between the two treatment approaches. RESULTS: Eight studies involving a total of 892 patients were finally selected, with 394 cases in the laparoscopic surgery group and 498 cases in the traditional open surgery group. Compared with the traditional open group, the laparoscopic group had a longer operative time (WMD = 81.56, 95% CI (2.09, 142.03), P = 0.008), but less intraoperative blood loss (WMD = −452.18, 95% CI (-652.23, -252.13), P < 0.00001), shorter postoperative hospital stay (WMD = −5.30, 95% CI (-8.42, -2.18), P = 0.0009), and higher R0 resection rate (OR = 2.17, 95% CI (1.14, 4.15), P = 0.02). There was no significant difference in the incidence of surgical complications between the two groups (OR = 0.52, 95% CI (0.26, 1.07), P = 0.08). Lateral lymph node harvest, lateral lymph node metastasis, local recurrence, 3-year overall survival, and 3-year disease-free survival did not differ significantly between the two approaches (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic LLND has a similar efficacy in oncological outcomes and postoperative complications to the conventional open surgery, with the advantages of reduced intraoperative blood loss, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and higher R0 resection rate, and tumor radical cure is similar to traditional open surgery. Laparoscopic LLND is a safe and feasible surgical approach, and it may be used as a standard procedure in LLND for advanced rectal cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6425322
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64253222019-04-07 Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery in Lateral Lymph Node Dissection for Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Ouyang, Manzhao Liao, Tianyou Lu, Yan Deng, Leilei Luo, Zhentao Wu, Jinhao Ju, Yongle Yao, Xueqing Gastroenterol Res Pract Review Article AIM: To compare the clinical efficacies between laparoscopic and conventional open surgery in lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) for advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: We comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang Data and performed a cumulative meta-analysis. According to inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria, all eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or retrospective or prospective comparative studies assessing the two techniques were included, and then a meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software to assess the difference in clinical and oncological outcomes between the two treatment approaches. RESULTS: Eight studies involving a total of 892 patients were finally selected, with 394 cases in the laparoscopic surgery group and 498 cases in the traditional open surgery group. Compared with the traditional open group, the laparoscopic group had a longer operative time (WMD = 81.56, 95% CI (2.09, 142.03), P = 0.008), but less intraoperative blood loss (WMD = −452.18, 95% CI (-652.23, -252.13), P < 0.00001), shorter postoperative hospital stay (WMD = −5.30, 95% CI (-8.42, -2.18), P = 0.0009), and higher R0 resection rate (OR = 2.17, 95% CI (1.14, 4.15), P = 0.02). There was no significant difference in the incidence of surgical complications between the two groups (OR = 0.52, 95% CI (0.26, 1.07), P = 0.08). Lateral lymph node harvest, lateral lymph node metastasis, local recurrence, 3-year overall survival, and 3-year disease-free survival did not differ significantly between the two approaches (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic LLND has a similar efficacy in oncological outcomes and postoperative complications to the conventional open surgery, with the advantages of reduced intraoperative blood loss, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and higher R0 resection rate, and tumor radical cure is similar to traditional open surgery. Laparoscopic LLND is a safe and feasible surgical approach, and it may be used as a standard procedure in LLND for advanced rectal cancer. Hindawi 2019-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6425322/ /pubmed/30956657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/7689082 Text en Copyright © 2019 Manzhao Ouyang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Ouyang, Manzhao
Liao, Tianyou
Lu, Yan
Deng, Leilei
Luo, Zhentao
Wu, Jinhao
Ju, Yongle
Yao, Xueqing
Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery in Lateral Lymph Node Dissection for Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery in Lateral Lymph Node Dissection for Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery in Lateral Lymph Node Dissection for Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery in Lateral Lymph Node Dissection for Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery in Lateral Lymph Node Dissection for Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery in Lateral Lymph Node Dissection for Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort laparoscopic versus open surgery in lateral lymph node dissection for advanced rectal cancer: a meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6425322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30956657
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/7689082
work_keys_str_mv AT ouyangmanzhao laparoscopicversusopensurgeryinlaterallymphnodedissectionforadvancedrectalcancerametaanalysis
AT liaotianyou laparoscopicversusopensurgeryinlaterallymphnodedissectionforadvancedrectalcancerametaanalysis
AT luyan laparoscopicversusopensurgeryinlaterallymphnodedissectionforadvancedrectalcancerametaanalysis
AT dengleilei laparoscopicversusopensurgeryinlaterallymphnodedissectionforadvancedrectalcancerametaanalysis
AT luozhentao laparoscopicversusopensurgeryinlaterallymphnodedissectionforadvancedrectalcancerametaanalysis
AT wujinhao laparoscopicversusopensurgeryinlaterallymphnodedissectionforadvancedrectalcancerametaanalysis
AT juyongle laparoscopicversusopensurgeryinlaterallymphnodedissectionforadvancedrectalcancerametaanalysis
AT yaoxueqing laparoscopicversusopensurgeryinlaterallymphnodedissectionforadvancedrectalcancerametaanalysis