Cargando…
Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery in Lateral Lymph Node Dissection for Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
AIM: To compare the clinical efficacies between laparoscopic and conventional open surgery in lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) for advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: We comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang Data and performed a cumulative meta-analysis. Accor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6425322/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30956657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/7689082 |
_version_ | 1783404820187578368 |
---|---|
author | Ouyang, Manzhao Liao, Tianyou Lu, Yan Deng, Leilei Luo, Zhentao Wu, Jinhao Ju, Yongle Yao, Xueqing |
author_facet | Ouyang, Manzhao Liao, Tianyou Lu, Yan Deng, Leilei Luo, Zhentao Wu, Jinhao Ju, Yongle Yao, Xueqing |
author_sort | Ouyang, Manzhao |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To compare the clinical efficacies between laparoscopic and conventional open surgery in lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) for advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: We comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang Data and performed a cumulative meta-analysis. According to inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria, all eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or retrospective or prospective comparative studies assessing the two techniques were included, and then a meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software to assess the difference in clinical and oncological outcomes between the two treatment approaches. RESULTS: Eight studies involving a total of 892 patients were finally selected, with 394 cases in the laparoscopic surgery group and 498 cases in the traditional open surgery group. Compared with the traditional open group, the laparoscopic group had a longer operative time (WMD = 81.56, 95% CI (2.09, 142.03), P = 0.008), but less intraoperative blood loss (WMD = −452.18, 95% CI (-652.23, -252.13), P < 0.00001), shorter postoperative hospital stay (WMD = −5.30, 95% CI (-8.42, -2.18), P = 0.0009), and higher R0 resection rate (OR = 2.17, 95% CI (1.14, 4.15), P = 0.02). There was no significant difference in the incidence of surgical complications between the two groups (OR = 0.52, 95% CI (0.26, 1.07), P = 0.08). Lateral lymph node harvest, lateral lymph node metastasis, local recurrence, 3-year overall survival, and 3-year disease-free survival did not differ significantly between the two approaches (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic LLND has a similar efficacy in oncological outcomes and postoperative complications to the conventional open surgery, with the advantages of reduced intraoperative blood loss, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and higher R0 resection rate, and tumor radical cure is similar to traditional open surgery. Laparoscopic LLND is a safe and feasible surgical approach, and it may be used as a standard procedure in LLND for advanced rectal cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6425322 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64253222019-04-07 Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery in Lateral Lymph Node Dissection for Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Ouyang, Manzhao Liao, Tianyou Lu, Yan Deng, Leilei Luo, Zhentao Wu, Jinhao Ju, Yongle Yao, Xueqing Gastroenterol Res Pract Review Article AIM: To compare the clinical efficacies between laparoscopic and conventional open surgery in lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) for advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: We comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang Data and performed a cumulative meta-analysis. According to inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria, all eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or retrospective or prospective comparative studies assessing the two techniques were included, and then a meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software to assess the difference in clinical and oncological outcomes between the two treatment approaches. RESULTS: Eight studies involving a total of 892 patients were finally selected, with 394 cases in the laparoscopic surgery group and 498 cases in the traditional open surgery group. Compared with the traditional open group, the laparoscopic group had a longer operative time (WMD = 81.56, 95% CI (2.09, 142.03), P = 0.008), but less intraoperative blood loss (WMD = −452.18, 95% CI (-652.23, -252.13), P < 0.00001), shorter postoperative hospital stay (WMD = −5.30, 95% CI (-8.42, -2.18), P = 0.0009), and higher R0 resection rate (OR = 2.17, 95% CI (1.14, 4.15), P = 0.02). There was no significant difference in the incidence of surgical complications between the two groups (OR = 0.52, 95% CI (0.26, 1.07), P = 0.08). Lateral lymph node harvest, lateral lymph node metastasis, local recurrence, 3-year overall survival, and 3-year disease-free survival did not differ significantly between the two approaches (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic LLND has a similar efficacy in oncological outcomes and postoperative complications to the conventional open surgery, with the advantages of reduced intraoperative blood loss, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and higher R0 resection rate, and tumor radical cure is similar to traditional open surgery. Laparoscopic LLND is a safe and feasible surgical approach, and it may be used as a standard procedure in LLND for advanced rectal cancer. Hindawi 2019-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6425322/ /pubmed/30956657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/7689082 Text en Copyright © 2019 Manzhao Ouyang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Ouyang, Manzhao Liao, Tianyou Lu, Yan Deng, Leilei Luo, Zhentao Wu, Jinhao Ju, Yongle Yao, Xueqing Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery in Lateral Lymph Node Dissection for Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis |
title | Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery in Lateral Lymph Node Dissection for Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery in Lateral Lymph Node Dissection for Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery in Lateral Lymph Node Dissection for Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery in Lateral Lymph Node Dissection for Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery in Lateral Lymph Node Dissection for Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | laparoscopic versus open surgery in lateral lymph node dissection for advanced rectal cancer: a meta-analysis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6425322/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30956657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/7689082 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ouyangmanzhao laparoscopicversusopensurgeryinlaterallymphnodedissectionforadvancedrectalcancerametaanalysis AT liaotianyou laparoscopicversusopensurgeryinlaterallymphnodedissectionforadvancedrectalcancerametaanalysis AT luyan laparoscopicversusopensurgeryinlaterallymphnodedissectionforadvancedrectalcancerametaanalysis AT dengleilei laparoscopicversusopensurgeryinlaterallymphnodedissectionforadvancedrectalcancerametaanalysis AT luozhentao laparoscopicversusopensurgeryinlaterallymphnodedissectionforadvancedrectalcancerametaanalysis AT wujinhao laparoscopicversusopensurgeryinlaterallymphnodedissectionforadvancedrectalcancerametaanalysis AT juyongle laparoscopicversusopensurgeryinlaterallymphnodedissectionforadvancedrectalcancerametaanalysis AT yaoxueqing laparoscopicversusopensurgeryinlaterallymphnodedissectionforadvancedrectalcancerametaanalysis |