Cargando…

A process for developing standards to promote quality in general practice

BACKGROUND: Since 1991, the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners’ (RACGP) Standards for General Practices (the Standards) have provided a framework for quality care, risk management and best practice in the operation of Australian general practices. The Standards are also linked to ince...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khoury, Julie, Krejany, Catherine J, Versteeg, Roald W, Lodewyckx, Michaela A, Pike, Simone R, Civil, Michael S, Jiwa, Moyez
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6425464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29868888
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmy049
_version_ 1783404850384470016
author Khoury, Julie
Krejany, Catherine J
Versteeg, Roald W
Lodewyckx, Michaela A
Pike, Simone R
Civil, Michael S
Jiwa, Moyez
author_facet Khoury, Julie
Krejany, Catherine J
Versteeg, Roald W
Lodewyckx, Michaela A
Pike, Simone R
Civil, Michael S
Jiwa, Moyez
author_sort Khoury, Julie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Since 1991, the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners’ (RACGP) Standards for General Practices (the Standards) have provided a framework for quality care, risk management and best practice in the operation of Australian general practices. The Standards are also linked to incentives for general practice remuneration. These Standards were revised in 2017. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to describe the process undertaken to develop the fifth edition Standards published in 2017 to inform future standards development both nationally and internationally. METHOD: A modified Delphi process was deployed to develop the fifth edition Standards. Development was directed by the RACGP and led by an expert panel of GPs and representatives of stakeholder groups who were assisted and facilitated by a team from RACGP. Each draft was released for stakeholder feedback and tested twice before the final version was submitted for approval by the RACGP board. RESULTS: Four rounds of consultation and two rounds of piloting were carried out over 32 months. The Standards were redrafted after each round. One hundred and fifty-two individuals and 225 stakeholder groups participated in the development of the Standards. Twenty-three new indicators were recommended and grouped into three sections in a new modular structure that was different from the previous edition. CONCLUSION: The Standards represent the consensus view of national stakeholders on the indicators of quality and safety in Australian general practice and primary care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6425464
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64254642019-03-22 A process for developing standards to promote quality in general practice Khoury, Julie Krejany, Catherine J Versteeg, Roald W Lodewyckx, Michaela A Pike, Simone R Civil, Michael S Jiwa, Moyez Fam Pract Health Services Research BACKGROUND: Since 1991, the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners’ (RACGP) Standards for General Practices (the Standards) have provided a framework for quality care, risk management and best practice in the operation of Australian general practices. The Standards are also linked to incentives for general practice remuneration. These Standards were revised in 2017. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to describe the process undertaken to develop the fifth edition Standards published in 2017 to inform future standards development both nationally and internationally. METHOD: A modified Delphi process was deployed to develop the fifth edition Standards. Development was directed by the RACGP and led by an expert panel of GPs and representatives of stakeholder groups who were assisted and facilitated by a team from RACGP. Each draft was released for stakeholder feedback and tested twice before the final version was submitted for approval by the RACGP board. RESULTS: Four rounds of consultation and two rounds of piloting were carried out over 32 months. The Standards were redrafted after each round. One hundred and fifty-two individuals and 225 stakeholder groups participated in the development of the Standards. Twenty-three new indicators were recommended and grouped into three sections in a new modular structure that was different from the previous edition. CONCLUSION: The Standards represent the consensus view of national stakeholders on the indicators of quality and safety in Australian general practice and primary care. Oxford University Press 2018-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6425464/ /pubmed/29868888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmy049 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Khoury, Julie
Krejany, Catherine J
Versteeg, Roald W
Lodewyckx, Michaela A
Pike, Simone R
Civil, Michael S
Jiwa, Moyez
A process for developing standards to promote quality in general practice
title A process for developing standards to promote quality in general practice
title_full A process for developing standards to promote quality in general practice
title_fullStr A process for developing standards to promote quality in general practice
title_full_unstemmed A process for developing standards to promote quality in general practice
title_short A process for developing standards to promote quality in general practice
title_sort process for developing standards to promote quality in general practice
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6425464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29868888
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmy049
work_keys_str_mv AT khouryjulie aprocessfordevelopingstandardstopromotequalityingeneralpractice
AT krejanycatherinej aprocessfordevelopingstandardstopromotequalityingeneralpractice
AT versteegroaldw aprocessfordevelopingstandardstopromotequalityingeneralpractice
AT lodewyckxmichaelaa aprocessfordevelopingstandardstopromotequalityingeneralpractice
AT pikesimoner aprocessfordevelopingstandardstopromotequalityingeneralpractice
AT civilmichaels aprocessfordevelopingstandardstopromotequalityingeneralpractice
AT jiwamoyez aprocessfordevelopingstandardstopromotequalityingeneralpractice
AT khouryjulie processfordevelopingstandardstopromotequalityingeneralpractice
AT krejanycatherinej processfordevelopingstandardstopromotequalityingeneralpractice
AT versteegroaldw processfordevelopingstandardstopromotequalityingeneralpractice
AT lodewyckxmichaelaa processfordevelopingstandardstopromotequalityingeneralpractice
AT pikesimoner processfordevelopingstandardstopromotequalityingeneralpractice
AT civilmichaels processfordevelopingstandardstopromotequalityingeneralpractice
AT jiwamoyez processfordevelopingstandardstopromotequalityingeneralpractice