Cargando…
A process for developing standards to promote quality in general practice
BACKGROUND: Since 1991, the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners’ (RACGP) Standards for General Practices (the Standards) have provided a framework for quality care, risk management and best practice in the operation of Australian general practices. The Standards are also linked to ince...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6425464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29868888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmy049 |
_version_ | 1783404850384470016 |
---|---|
author | Khoury, Julie Krejany, Catherine J Versteeg, Roald W Lodewyckx, Michaela A Pike, Simone R Civil, Michael S Jiwa, Moyez |
author_facet | Khoury, Julie Krejany, Catherine J Versteeg, Roald W Lodewyckx, Michaela A Pike, Simone R Civil, Michael S Jiwa, Moyez |
author_sort | Khoury, Julie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Since 1991, the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners’ (RACGP) Standards for General Practices (the Standards) have provided a framework for quality care, risk management and best practice in the operation of Australian general practices. The Standards are also linked to incentives for general practice remuneration. These Standards were revised in 2017. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to describe the process undertaken to develop the fifth edition Standards published in 2017 to inform future standards development both nationally and internationally. METHOD: A modified Delphi process was deployed to develop the fifth edition Standards. Development was directed by the RACGP and led by an expert panel of GPs and representatives of stakeholder groups who were assisted and facilitated by a team from RACGP. Each draft was released for stakeholder feedback and tested twice before the final version was submitted for approval by the RACGP board. RESULTS: Four rounds of consultation and two rounds of piloting were carried out over 32 months. The Standards were redrafted after each round. One hundred and fifty-two individuals and 225 stakeholder groups participated in the development of the Standards. Twenty-three new indicators were recommended and grouped into three sections in a new modular structure that was different from the previous edition. CONCLUSION: The Standards represent the consensus view of national stakeholders on the indicators of quality and safety in Australian general practice and primary care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6425464 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64254642019-03-22 A process for developing standards to promote quality in general practice Khoury, Julie Krejany, Catherine J Versteeg, Roald W Lodewyckx, Michaela A Pike, Simone R Civil, Michael S Jiwa, Moyez Fam Pract Health Services Research BACKGROUND: Since 1991, the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners’ (RACGP) Standards for General Practices (the Standards) have provided a framework for quality care, risk management and best practice in the operation of Australian general practices. The Standards are also linked to incentives for general practice remuneration. These Standards were revised in 2017. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to describe the process undertaken to develop the fifth edition Standards published in 2017 to inform future standards development both nationally and internationally. METHOD: A modified Delphi process was deployed to develop the fifth edition Standards. Development was directed by the RACGP and led by an expert panel of GPs and representatives of stakeholder groups who were assisted and facilitated by a team from RACGP. Each draft was released for stakeholder feedback and tested twice before the final version was submitted for approval by the RACGP board. RESULTS: Four rounds of consultation and two rounds of piloting were carried out over 32 months. The Standards were redrafted after each round. One hundred and fifty-two individuals and 225 stakeholder groups participated in the development of the Standards. Twenty-three new indicators were recommended and grouped into three sections in a new modular structure that was different from the previous edition. CONCLUSION: The Standards represent the consensus view of national stakeholders on the indicators of quality and safety in Australian general practice and primary care. Oxford University Press 2018-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6425464/ /pubmed/29868888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmy049 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Khoury, Julie Krejany, Catherine J Versteeg, Roald W Lodewyckx, Michaela A Pike, Simone R Civil, Michael S Jiwa, Moyez A process for developing standards to promote quality in general practice |
title | A process for developing standards to promote quality in general practice |
title_full | A process for developing standards to promote quality in general practice |
title_fullStr | A process for developing standards to promote quality in general practice |
title_full_unstemmed | A process for developing standards to promote quality in general practice |
title_short | A process for developing standards to promote quality in general practice |
title_sort | process for developing standards to promote quality in general practice |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6425464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29868888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmy049 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khouryjulie aprocessfordevelopingstandardstopromotequalityingeneralpractice AT krejanycatherinej aprocessfordevelopingstandardstopromotequalityingeneralpractice AT versteegroaldw aprocessfordevelopingstandardstopromotequalityingeneralpractice AT lodewyckxmichaelaa aprocessfordevelopingstandardstopromotequalityingeneralpractice AT pikesimoner aprocessfordevelopingstandardstopromotequalityingeneralpractice AT civilmichaels aprocessfordevelopingstandardstopromotequalityingeneralpractice AT jiwamoyez aprocessfordevelopingstandardstopromotequalityingeneralpractice AT khouryjulie processfordevelopingstandardstopromotequalityingeneralpractice AT krejanycatherinej processfordevelopingstandardstopromotequalityingeneralpractice AT versteegroaldw processfordevelopingstandardstopromotequalityingeneralpractice AT lodewyckxmichaelaa processfordevelopingstandardstopromotequalityingeneralpractice AT pikesimoner processfordevelopingstandardstopromotequalityingeneralpractice AT civilmichaels processfordevelopingstandardstopromotequalityingeneralpractice AT jiwamoyez processfordevelopingstandardstopromotequalityingeneralpractice |