Cargando…

Design and methodology of the impact of HemoDiaFIlTration on physical activity and self-reported outcomes: a randomized controlled trial (HDFIT trial) in Brazil

BACKGROUND: End stage renal disease (ESRD) patients require a renal replacement therapy (RRT) to filter accumulated toxins and remove excess water, which are associated with impaired physical function. Hemodialysis (HD) removes middle-molecular weight (MMW) toxins less efficiently compared to hemodi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pecoits-Filho, Roberto, Larkin, John W., Poli-de-Figueiredo, Carlos Eduardo, Cuvello Neto, Américo Lourenço, Barra, Ana Beatriz, Canhada, Sinaia, de Campos, Ludimila Guedim, Woehl, Juliane, Gonçalves, Priscila Bezerra, Han, Hao, de Moraes, Thyago Proença, Raimann, Jochen G., Canziani, Maria Eugenia F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6425582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30894141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-019-1247-8
_version_ 1783404865453555712
author Pecoits-Filho, Roberto
Larkin, John W.
Poli-de-Figueiredo, Carlos Eduardo
Cuvello Neto, Américo Lourenço
Barra, Ana Beatriz
Canhada, Sinaia
de Campos, Ludimila Guedim
Woehl, Juliane
Gonçalves, Priscila Bezerra
Han, Hao
de Moraes, Thyago Proença
Raimann, Jochen G.
Canziani, Maria Eugenia F.
author_facet Pecoits-Filho, Roberto
Larkin, John W.
Poli-de-Figueiredo, Carlos Eduardo
Cuvello Neto, Américo Lourenço
Barra, Ana Beatriz
Canhada, Sinaia
de Campos, Ludimila Guedim
Woehl, Juliane
Gonçalves, Priscila Bezerra
Han, Hao
de Moraes, Thyago Proença
Raimann, Jochen G.
Canziani, Maria Eugenia F.
author_sort Pecoits-Filho, Roberto
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: End stage renal disease (ESRD) patients require a renal replacement therapy (RRT) to filter accumulated toxins and remove excess water, which are associated with impaired physical function. Hemodialysis (HD) removes middle-molecular weight (MMW) toxins less efficiently compared to hemodiafiltration (HDF); we hypothesized HDF may improve physical function. We detailed the design and methodology of the HDFIT protocol that is testing whether changing from HD to HDF effects physical activity levels and various outcomes. METHODS: HDFIT is a prospective, multi-center, unblinded, randomized control trial (RCT) investigating the impact of dialysis modality (HDF verses HD) on objectively measured physical activity levels, self-reported quality of life, and clinical/non-clinical outcomes. Clinically stable patients with HD vintage of 3 to 24 months without any severe limitation ambulation were recruited from sites throughout southern Brazil. Eligible patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either: 1) be treated with high volume online HDF for 6 months, or 2) continue being treated with high-flux HD. This study includes run-in and randomization visits (baseline), 3- and 6-month study visits during the interventional period, and a 12-month observational follow up. The primary outcome is the difference in the change in steps per 24 h on dialysis days from baseline to the 6-month follow up in patients treated with HDF versus HD. Physical activity is being measured over one week at study visits with the ActiGraph (www.actigraphcorp.com). For assessment of peridialytic differences during the dialysis recovery period, we will analyze granular physical activity levels based on the initiation time of HD on dialysis days, or concurrent times on non-dialysis days and the long interdialytic day. DISCUSSION: In this manuscript, we provide detailed information about the HDFIT study design and methodology. This trial will provide novel insights into peridialytic profiles of physical activity and various self-reported, clinical and laboratory outcomes in ESRD patients treated by high volume online HDF versus high-flux HD. Ultimately, this investigation will elucidate whether HDF is associated with patients having better vitality and quality of life, and less negative outcomes as compared to HD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov on 20 April 2016 (NCT02787161). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12882-019-1247-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6425582
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64255822019-03-29 Design and methodology of the impact of HemoDiaFIlTration on physical activity and self-reported outcomes: a randomized controlled trial (HDFIT trial) in Brazil Pecoits-Filho, Roberto Larkin, John W. Poli-de-Figueiredo, Carlos Eduardo Cuvello Neto, Américo Lourenço Barra, Ana Beatriz Canhada, Sinaia de Campos, Ludimila Guedim Woehl, Juliane Gonçalves, Priscila Bezerra Han, Hao de Moraes, Thyago Proença Raimann, Jochen G. Canziani, Maria Eugenia F. BMC Nephrol Study Protocol BACKGROUND: End stage renal disease (ESRD) patients require a renal replacement therapy (RRT) to filter accumulated toxins and remove excess water, which are associated with impaired physical function. Hemodialysis (HD) removes middle-molecular weight (MMW) toxins less efficiently compared to hemodiafiltration (HDF); we hypothesized HDF may improve physical function. We detailed the design and methodology of the HDFIT protocol that is testing whether changing from HD to HDF effects physical activity levels and various outcomes. METHODS: HDFIT is a prospective, multi-center, unblinded, randomized control trial (RCT) investigating the impact of dialysis modality (HDF verses HD) on objectively measured physical activity levels, self-reported quality of life, and clinical/non-clinical outcomes. Clinically stable patients with HD vintage of 3 to 24 months without any severe limitation ambulation were recruited from sites throughout southern Brazil. Eligible patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either: 1) be treated with high volume online HDF for 6 months, or 2) continue being treated with high-flux HD. This study includes run-in and randomization visits (baseline), 3- and 6-month study visits during the interventional period, and a 12-month observational follow up. The primary outcome is the difference in the change in steps per 24 h on dialysis days from baseline to the 6-month follow up in patients treated with HDF versus HD. Physical activity is being measured over one week at study visits with the ActiGraph (www.actigraphcorp.com). For assessment of peridialytic differences during the dialysis recovery period, we will analyze granular physical activity levels based on the initiation time of HD on dialysis days, or concurrent times on non-dialysis days and the long interdialytic day. DISCUSSION: In this manuscript, we provide detailed information about the HDFIT study design and methodology. This trial will provide novel insights into peridialytic profiles of physical activity and various self-reported, clinical and laboratory outcomes in ESRD patients treated by high volume online HDF versus high-flux HD. Ultimately, this investigation will elucidate whether HDF is associated with patients having better vitality and quality of life, and less negative outcomes as compared to HD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov on 20 April 2016 (NCT02787161). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12882-019-1247-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6425582/ /pubmed/30894141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-019-1247-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Pecoits-Filho, Roberto
Larkin, John W.
Poli-de-Figueiredo, Carlos Eduardo
Cuvello Neto, Américo Lourenço
Barra, Ana Beatriz
Canhada, Sinaia
de Campos, Ludimila Guedim
Woehl, Juliane
Gonçalves, Priscila Bezerra
Han, Hao
de Moraes, Thyago Proença
Raimann, Jochen G.
Canziani, Maria Eugenia F.
Design and methodology of the impact of HemoDiaFIlTration on physical activity and self-reported outcomes: a randomized controlled trial (HDFIT trial) in Brazil
title Design and methodology of the impact of HemoDiaFIlTration on physical activity and self-reported outcomes: a randomized controlled trial (HDFIT trial) in Brazil
title_full Design and methodology of the impact of HemoDiaFIlTration on physical activity and self-reported outcomes: a randomized controlled trial (HDFIT trial) in Brazil
title_fullStr Design and methodology of the impact of HemoDiaFIlTration on physical activity and self-reported outcomes: a randomized controlled trial (HDFIT trial) in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Design and methodology of the impact of HemoDiaFIlTration on physical activity and self-reported outcomes: a randomized controlled trial (HDFIT trial) in Brazil
title_short Design and methodology of the impact of HemoDiaFIlTration on physical activity and self-reported outcomes: a randomized controlled trial (HDFIT trial) in Brazil
title_sort design and methodology of the impact of hemodiafiltration on physical activity and self-reported outcomes: a randomized controlled trial (hdfit trial) in brazil
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6425582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30894141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-019-1247-8
work_keys_str_mv AT pecoitsfilhoroberto designandmethodologyoftheimpactofhemodiafiltrationonphysicalactivityandselfreportedoutcomesarandomizedcontrolledtrialhdfittrialinbrazil
AT larkinjohnw designandmethodologyoftheimpactofhemodiafiltrationonphysicalactivityandselfreportedoutcomesarandomizedcontrolledtrialhdfittrialinbrazil
AT polidefigueiredocarloseduardo designandmethodologyoftheimpactofhemodiafiltrationonphysicalactivityandselfreportedoutcomesarandomizedcontrolledtrialhdfittrialinbrazil
AT cuvellonetoamericolourenco designandmethodologyoftheimpactofhemodiafiltrationonphysicalactivityandselfreportedoutcomesarandomizedcontrolledtrialhdfittrialinbrazil
AT barraanabeatriz designandmethodologyoftheimpactofhemodiafiltrationonphysicalactivityandselfreportedoutcomesarandomizedcontrolledtrialhdfittrialinbrazil
AT canhadasinaia designandmethodologyoftheimpactofhemodiafiltrationonphysicalactivityandselfreportedoutcomesarandomizedcontrolledtrialhdfittrialinbrazil
AT decamposludimilaguedim designandmethodologyoftheimpactofhemodiafiltrationonphysicalactivityandselfreportedoutcomesarandomizedcontrolledtrialhdfittrialinbrazil
AT woehljuliane designandmethodologyoftheimpactofhemodiafiltrationonphysicalactivityandselfreportedoutcomesarandomizedcontrolledtrialhdfittrialinbrazil
AT goncalvespriscilabezerra designandmethodologyoftheimpactofhemodiafiltrationonphysicalactivityandselfreportedoutcomesarandomizedcontrolledtrialhdfittrialinbrazil
AT hanhao designandmethodologyoftheimpactofhemodiafiltrationonphysicalactivityandselfreportedoutcomesarandomizedcontrolledtrialhdfittrialinbrazil
AT demoraesthyagoproenca designandmethodologyoftheimpactofhemodiafiltrationonphysicalactivityandselfreportedoutcomesarandomizedcontrolledtrialhdfittrialinbrazil
AT raimannjocheng designandmethodologyoftheimpactofhemodiafiltrationonphysicalactivityandselfreportedoutcomesarandomizedcontrolledtrialhdfittrialinbrazil
AT canzianimariaeugeniaf designandmethodologyoftheimpactofhemodiafiltrationonphysicalactivityandselfreportedoutcomesarandomizedcontrolledtrialhdfittrialinbrazil
AT designandmethodologyoftheimpactofhemodiafiltrationonphysicalactivityandselfreportedoutcomesarandomizedcontrolledtrialhdfittrialinbrazil