Cargando…

CNNs for automatic glaucoma assessment using fundus images: an extensive validation

BACKGROUND: Most current algorithms for automatic glaucoma assessment using fundus images rely on handcrafted features based on segmentation, which are affected by the performance of the chosen segmentation method and the extracted features. Among other characteristics, convolutional neural networks...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Diaz-Pinto, Andres, Morales, Sandra, Naranjo, Valery, Köhler, Thomas, Mossi, Jose M., Navea, Amparo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6425593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30894178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-019-0649-y
_version_ 1783404868022566912
author Diaz-Pinto, Andres
Morales, Sandra
Naranjo, Valery
Köhler, Thomas
Mossi, Jose M.
Navea, Amparo
author_facet Diaz-Pinto, Andres
Morales, Sandra
Naranjo, Valery
Köhler, Thomas
Mossi, Jose M.
Navea, Amparo
author_sort Diaz-Pinto, Andres
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Most current algorithms for automatic glaucoma assessment using fundus images rely on handcrafted features based on segmentation, which are affected by the performance of the chosen segmentation method and the extracted features. Among other characteristics, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are known because of their ability to learn highly discriminative features from raw pixel intensities. METHODS: In this paper, we employed five different ImageNet-trained models (VGG16, VGG19, InceptionV3, ResNet50 and Xception) for automatic glaucoma assessment using fundus images. Results from an extensive validation using cross-validation and cross-testing strategies were compared with previous works in the literature. RESULTS: Using five public databases (1707 images), an average AUC of 0.9605 with a 95% confidence interval of 95.92–97.07%, an average specificity of 0.8580 and an average sensitivity of 0.9346 were obtained after using the Xception architecture, significantly improving the performance of other state-of-the-art works. Moreover, a new clinical database, ACRIMA, has been made publicly available, containing 705 labelled images. It is composed of 396 glaucomatous images and 309 normal images, which means, the largest public database for glaucoma diagnosis. The high specificity and sensitivity obtained from the proposed approach are supported by an extensive validation using not only the cross-validation strategy but also the cross-testing validation on, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, all publicly available glaucoma-labelled databases. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that using ImageNet-trained models is a robust alternative for automatic glaucoma screening system. All images, CNN weights and software used to fine-tune and test the five CNNs are publicly available, which could be used as a testbed for further comparisons.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6425593
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64255932019-03-29 CNNs for automatic glaucoma assessment using fundus images: an extensive validation Diaz-Pinto, Andres Morales, Sandra Naranjo, Valery Köhler, Thomas Mossi, Jose M. Navea, Amparo Biomed Eng Online Research BACKGROUND: Most current algorithms for automatic glaucoma assessment using fundus images rely on handcrafted features based on segmentation, which are affected by the performance of the chosen segmentation method and the extracted features. Among other characteristics, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are known because of their ability to learn highly discriminative features from raw pixel intensities. METHODS: In this paper, we employed five different ImageNet-trained models (VGG16, VGG19, InceptionV3, ResNet50 and Xception) for automatic glaucoma assessment using fundus images. Results from an extensive validation using cross-validation and cross-testing strategies were compared with previous works in the literature. RESULTS: Using five public databases (1707 images), an average AUC of 0.9605 with a 95% confidence interval of 95.92–97.07%, an average specificity of 0.8580 and an average sensitivity of 0.9346 were obtained after using the Xception architecture, significantly improving the performance of other state-of-the-art works. Moreover, a new clinical database, ACRIMA, has been made publicly available, containing 705 labelled images. It is composed of 396 glaucomatous images and 309 normal images, which means, the largest public database for glaucoma diagnosis. The high specificity and sensitivity obtained from the proposed approach are supported by an extensive validation using not only the cross-validation strategy but also the cross-testing validation on, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, all publicly available glaucoma-labelled databases. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that using ImageNet-trained models is a robust alternative for automatic glaucoma screening system. All images, CNN weights and software used to fine-tune and test the five CNNs are publicly available, which could be used as a testbed for further comparisons. BioMed Central 2019-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6425593/ /pubmed/30894178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-019-0649-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Diaz-Pinto, Andres
Morales, Sandra
Naranjo, Valery
Köhler, Thomas
Mossi, Jose M.
Navea, Amparo
CNNs for automatic glaucoma assessment using fundus images: an extensive validation
title CNNs for automatic glaucoma assessment using fundus images: an extensive validation
title_full CNNs for automatic glaucoma assessment using fundus images: an extensive validation
title_fullStr CNNs for automatic glaucoma assessment using fundus images: an extensive validation
title_full_unstemmed CNNs for automatic glaucoma assessment using fundus images: an extensive validation
title_short CNNs for automatic glaucoma assessment using fundus images: an extensive validation
title_sort cnns for automatic glaucoma assessment using fundus images: an extensive validation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6425593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30894178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-019-0649-y
work_keys_str_mv AT diazpintoandres cnnsforautomaticglaucomaassessmentusingfundusimagesanextensivevalidation
AT moralessandra cnnsforautomaticglaucomaassessmentusingfundusimagesanextensivevalidation
AT naranjovalery cnnsforautomaticglaucomaassessmentusingfundusimagesanextensivevalidation
AT kohlerthomas cnnsforautomaticglaucomaassessmentusingfundusimagesanextensivevalidation
AT mossijosem cnnsforautomaticglaucomaassessmentusingfundusimagesanextensivevalidation
AT naveaamparo cnnsforautomaticglaucomaassessmentusingfundusimagesanextensivevalidation