Cargando…
CNNs for automatic glaucoma assessment using fundus images: an extensive validation
BACKGROUND: Most current algorithms for automatic glaucoma assessment using fundus images rely on handcrafted features based on segmentation, which are affected by the performance of the chosen segmentation method and the extracted features. Among other characteristics, convolutional neural networks...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6425593/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30894178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-019-0649-y |
_version_ | 1783404868022566912 |
---|---|
author | Diaz-Pinto, Andres Morales, Sandra Naranjo, Valery Köhler, Thomas Mossi, Jose M. Navea, Amparo |
author_facet | Diaz-Pinto, Andres Morales, Sandra Naranjo, Valery Köhler, Thomas Mossi, Jose M. Navea, Amparo |
author_sort | Diaz-Pinto, Andres |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Most current algorithms for automatic glaucoma assessment using fundus images rely on handcrafted features based on segmentation, which are affected by the performance of the chosen segmentation method and the extracted features. Among other characteristics, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are known because of their ability to learn highly discriminative features from raw pixel intensities. METHODS: In this paper, we employed five different ImageNet-trained models (VGG16, VGG19, InceptionV3, ResNet50 and Xception) for automatic glaucoma assessment using fundus images. Results from an extensive validation using cross-validation and cross-testing strategies were compared with previous works in the literature. RESULTS: Using five public databases (1707 images), an average AUC of 0.9605 with a 95% confidence interval of 95.92–97.07%, an average specificity of 0.8580 and an average sensitivity of 0.9346 were obtained after using the Xception architecture, significantly improving the performance of other state-of-the-art works. Moreover, a new clinical database, ACRIMA, has been made publicly available, containing 705 labelled images. It is composed of 396 glaucomatous images and 309 normal images, which means, the largest public database for glaucoma diagnosis. The high specificity and sensitivity obtained from the proposed approach are supported by an extensive validation using not only the cross-validation strategy but also the cross-testing validation on, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, all publicly available glaucoma-labelled databases. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that using ImageNet-trained models is a robust alternative for automatic glaucoma screening system. All images, CNN weights and software used to fine-tune and test the five CNNs are publicly available, which could be used as a testbed for further comparisons. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6425593 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64255932019-03-29 CNNs for automatic glaucoma assessment using fundus images: an extensive validation Diaz-Pinto, Andres Morales, Sandra Naranjo, Valery Köhler, Thomas Mossi, Jose M. Navea, Amparo Biomed Eng Online Research BACKGROUND: Most current algorithms for automatic glaucoma assessment using fundus images rely on handcrafted features based on segmentation, which are affected by the performance of the chosen segmentation method and the extracted features. Among other characteristics, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are known because of their ability to learn highly discriminative features from raw pixel intensities. METHODS: In this paper, we employed five different ImageNet-trained models (VGG16, VGG19, InceptionV3, ResNet50 and Xception) for automatic glaucoma assessment using fundus images. Results from an extensive validation using cross-validation and cross-testing strategies were compared with previous works in the literature. RESULTS: Using five public databases (1707 images), an average AUC of 0.9605 with a 95% confidence interval of 95.92–97.07%, an average specificity of 0.8580 and an average sensitivity of 0.9346 were obtained after using the Xception architecture, significantly improving the performance of other state-of-the-art works. Moreover, a new clinical database, ACRIMA, has been made publicly available, containing 705 labelled images. It is composed of 396 glaucomatous images and 309 normal images, which means, the largest public database for glaucoma diagnosis. The high specificity and sensitivity obtained from the proposed approach are supported by an extensive validation using not only the cross-validation strategy but also the cross-testing validation on, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, all publicly available glaucoma-labelled databases. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that using ImageNet-trained models is a robust alternative for automatic glaucoma screening system. All images, CNN weights and software used to fine-tune and test the five CNNs are publicly available, which could be used as a testbed for further comparisons. BioMed Central 2019-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6425593/ /pubmed/30894178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-019-0649-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Diaz-Pinto, Andres Morales, Sandra Naranjo, Valery Köhler, Thomas Mossi, Jose M. Navea, Amparo CNNs for automatic glaucoma assessment using fundus images: an extensive validation |
title | CNNs for automatic glaucoma assessment using fundus images: an extensive validation |
title_full | CNNs for automatic glaucoma assessment using fundus images: an extensive validation |
title_fullStr | CNNs for automatic glaucoma assessment using fundus images: an extensive validation |
title_full_unstemmed | CNNs for automatic glaucoma assessment using fundus images: an extensive validation |
title_short | CNNs for automatic glaucoma assessment using fundus images: an extensive validation |
title_sort | cnns for automatic glaucoma assessment using fundus images: an extensive validation |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6425593/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30894178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-019-0649-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT diazpintoandres cnnsforautomaticglaucomaassessmentusingfundusimagesanextensivevalidation AT moralessandra cnnsforautomaticglaucomaassessmentusingfundusimagesanextensivevalidation AT naranjovalery cnnsforautomaticglaucomaassessmentusingfundusimagesanextensivevalidation AT kohlerthomas cnnsforautomaticglaucomaassessmentusingfundusimagesanextensivevalidation AT mossijosem cnnsforautomaticglaucomaassessmentusingfundusimagesanextensivevalidation AT naveaamparo cnnsforautomaticglaucomaassessmentusingfundusimagesanextensivevalidation |