Cargando…
Diagnostic accuracy of TB-LAMP for pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: The need for a rapid, molecular test to diagnose tuberculosis (TB) has prompted exploration of TB-LAMP (Eiken; Tokyo, Japan) for use in resource-limited settings. We conducted a systematic review to assess the accuracy of TB-LAMP as a diagnostic test for pulmonary TB. METHODS: We analyze...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6425614/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30890135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-3881-y |
_version_ | 1783404872995962880 |
---|---|
author | Shete, Priya B. Farr, Katherine Strnad, Luke Gray, Christen M. Cattamanchi, Adithya |
author_facet | Shete, Priya B. Farr, Katherine Strnad, Luke Gray, Christen M. Cattamanchi, Adithya |
author_sort | Shete, Priya B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The need for a rapid, molecular test to diagnose tuberculosis (TB) has prompted exploration of TB-LAMP (Eiken; Tokyo, Japan) for use in resource-limited settings. We conducted a systematic review to assess the accuracy of TB-LAMP as a diagnostic test for pulmonary TB. METHODS: We analyzed individual-level data for eligible patients from all studies of TB-LAMP conducted between Jan 2012 and October 2015 to compare the diagnostic accuracy of TB-LAMP with that of smear microscopy and Xpert MTB/RIF® using 3 reference standards of varying stringency. Pooled sensitivity and specificity and pooled differences in sensitivity and specificity were estimated using random effects meta-analysis. Study quality was evaluated using QUADAS-2. RESULTS: Four thousand seven hundred sixty individuals across 13 studies met eligibility criteria. Methodological quality was judged to be low for all studies. TB-LAMP had higher sensitivity than sputum smear microscopy (pooled sensitivity difference + 13·2, 95% CI 4·5–21·9%) and similar sensitivity to Xpert MTB/RIF (pooled sensitivity difference − 2·5, 95% CI -8·0 to + 2·9) using the most stringent reference standard available. Specificity of TB-LAMP was similar to that of sputum smear microscopy (pooled specificity difference − 1·8, 95% CI -3·8 to + 0·2) and Xpert MTB/RIF (pooled specificity difference 0·5, 95% CI -0·9 to + 1·8). CONCLUSIONS: From the perspective of diagnostic accuracy, TB-LAMP may be considered as an alternative test for sputum smear microscopy. Additional factors such as cost, feasibility, and acceptability in settings that continue to rely on sputum smear microscopy should be considered when deciding to adopt this technology. Xpert MTB/RIF should continue to be preferred in settings where resource and infrastructure requirements are adequate and where HIV co-infection or drug-resistance is of concern. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12879-019-3881-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6425614 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64256142019-03-29 Diagnostic accuracy of TB-LAMP for pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis Shete, Priya B. Farr, Katherine Strnad, Luke Gray, Christen M. Cattamanchi, Adithya BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: The need for a rapid, molecular test to diagnose tuberculosis (TB) has prompted exploration of TB-LAMP (Eiken; Tokyo, Japan) for use in resource-limited settings. We conducted a systematic review to assess the accuracy of TB-LAMP as a diagnostic test for pulmonary TB. METHODS: We analyzed individual-level data for eligible patients from all studies of TB-LAMP conducted between Jan 2012 and October 2015 to compare the diagnostic accuracy of TB-LAMP with that of smear microscopy and Xpert MTB/RIF® using 3 reference standards of varying stringency. Pooled sensitivity and specificity and pooled differences in sensitivity and specificity were estimated using random effects meta-analysis. Study quality was evaluated using QUADAS-2. RESULTS: Four thousand seven hundred sixty individuals across 13 studies met eligibility criteria. Methodological quality was judged to be low for all studies. TB-LAMP had higher sensitivity than sputum smear microscopy (pooled sensitivity difference + 13·2, 95% CI 4·5–21·9%) and similar sensitivity to Xpert MTB/RIF (pooled sensitivity difference − 2·5, 95% CI -8·0 to + 2·9) using the most stringent reference standard available. Specificity of TB-LAMP was similar to that of sputum smear microscopy (pooled specificity difference − 1·8, 95% CI -3·8 to + 0·2) and Xpert MTB/RIF (pooled specificity difference 0·5, 95% CI -0·9 to + 1·8). CONCLUSIONS: From the perspective of diagnostic accuracy, TB-LAMP may be considered as an alternative test for sputum smear microscopy. Additional factors such as cost, feasibility, and acceptability in settings that continue to rely on sputum smear microscopy should be considered when deciding to adopt this technology. Xpert MTB/RIF should continue to be preferred in settings where resource and infrastructure requirements are adequate and where HIV co-infection or drug-resistance is of concern. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12879-019-3881-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6425614/ /pubmed/30890135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-3881-y Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Shete, Priya B. Farr, Katherine Strnad, Luke Gray, Christen M. Cattamanchi, Adithya Diagnostic accuracy of TB-LAMP for pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Diagnostic accuracy of TB-LAMP for pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Diagnostic accuracy of TB-LAMP for pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic accuracy of TB-LAMP for pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic accuracy of TB-LAMP for pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Diagnostic accuracy of TB-LAMP for pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | diagnostic accuracy of tb-lamp for pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6425614/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30890135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-3881-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shetepriyab diagnosticaccuracyoftblampforpulmonarytuberculosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT farrkatherine diagnosticaccuracyoftblampforpulmonarytuberculosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT strnadluke diagnosticaccuracyoftblampforpulmonarytuberculosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT graychristenm diagnosticaccuracyoftblampforpulmonarytuberculosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT cattamanchiadithya diagnosticaccuracyoftblampforpulmonarytuberculosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |