Cargando…

Differences in gait and trunk movement between patients after ankle fracture and healthy subjects

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that gait asymmetry and activity limitation can persist several months or years after ankle fracture. However, evidence of gait and trunk movement patterns following ankle fracture during the early rehabilitation period is scarce. Thus, we compared gait patterns and tr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hsu, Chia-Yu, Tsai, Yuh-Show, Yau, Cheng-Shiang, Shie, Hung-Hai, Wu, Chu-Ming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6425625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30890177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-019-0644-3
_version_ 1783404874644324352
author Hsu, Chia-Yu
Tsai, Yuh-Show
Yau, Cheng-Shiang
Shie, Hung-Hai
Wu, Chu-Ming
author_facet Hsu, Chia-Yu
Tsai, Yuh-Show
Yau, Cheng-Shiang
Shie, Hung-Hai
Wu, Chu-Ming
author_sort Hsu, Chia-Yu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that gait asymmetry and activity limitation can persist several months or years after ankle fracture. However, evidence of gait and trunk movement patterns following ankle fracture during the early rehabilitation period is scarce. Thus, we compared gait patterns and trunk movement during the early phase of rehabilitation between patients with ankle fracture and matched controls. METHODS: Ten patients with ankle fractures, and ten age- and sex-matched healthy controls were prospectively enrolled. An automated infrared-assisted, trunk accelerometer-based gait analysis system was used to measure walking speed, step length, and cadence. The median time of the evaluation following ankle fracture was 4.0 months. Trunk movement intensity was evaluated as acceleration root mean square. Trunk movement symmetry and regularity were analysed using the autocorrelation method. Differences in gait characteristics between the patient and control groups were analysed using the Mann–Whitney U test. Follow-up assessment of falls was performed 24 months after the fracture. The correlations between Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) scores/falls and gait parameters were evaluated using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Walking speed (p = 0.019), step length (p = 0.023), cadence (p = 0.003), and trunk movement intensity in anterior–posterior and vertical axis (p = 0.001, p = 0.003, respectively) were all significantly lower in the ankle fracture group than in the control group. Trunk movement symmetry in vertical direction (p = 0.019) decreased significantly in patients with ankle fractures, whereas between-strides regularity did not differ between groups. LEFS scores were moderately correlated with walking speed (r = 0.60, p = 0.044) and step length (r = 0.68, p = 0.021). During the 24 months after the fracture, 3 falls were reported by 3 patients. Trunk acceleration root mean square ratio in mediolateral axis (r = 0.72, p = 0.018) was highly correlated with future falls. CONCLUSION: During early rehabilitation, patients with ankle fracture may develop trunk movement asymmetry in the vertical direction accompanied with slower walking speed and cadence, and smaller step lengths, which can contribute to muscular imbalances and potential injury. Thus, proper rehabilitation strategies should be employed for these patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6425625
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64256252019-03-29 Differences in gait and trunk movement between patients after ankle fracture and healthy subjects Hsu, Chia-Yu Tsai, Yuh-Show Yau, Cheng-Shiang Shie, Hung-Hai Wu, Chu-Ming Biomed Eng Online Research BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that gait asymmetry and activity limitation can persist several months or years after ankle fracture. However, evidence of gait and trunk movement patterns following ankle fracture during the early rehabilitation period is scarce. Thus, we compared gait patterns and trunk movement during the early phase of rehabilitation between patients with ankle fracture and matched controls. METHODS: Ten patients with ankle fractures, and ten age- and sex-matched healthy controls were prospectively enrolled. An automated infrared-assisted, trunk accelerometer-based gait analysis system was used to measure walking speed, step length, and cadence. The median time of the evaluation following ankle fracture was 4.0 months. Trunk movement intensity was evaluated as acceleration root mean square. Trunk movement symmetry and regularity were analysed using the autocorrelation method. Differences in gait characteristics between the patient and control groups were analysed using the Mann–Whitney U test. Follow-up assessment of falls was performed 24 months after the fracture. The correlations between Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) scores/falls and gait parameters were evaluated using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Walking speed (p = 0.019), step length (p = 0.023), cadence (p = 0.003), and trunk movement intensity in anterior–posterior and vertical axis (p = 0.001, p = 0.003, respectively) were all significantly lower in the ankle fracture group than in the control group. Trunk movement symmetry in vertical direction (p = 0.019) decreased significantly in patients with ankle fractures, whereas between-strides regularity did not differ between groups. LEFS scores were moderately correlated with walking speed (r = 0.60, p = 0.044) and step length (r = 0.68, p = 0.021). During the 24 months after the fracture, 3 falls were reported by 3 patients. Trunk acceleration root mean square ratio in mediolateral axis (r = 0.72, p = 0.018) was highly correlated with future falls. CONCLUSION: During early rehabilitation, patients with ankle fracture may develop trunk movement asymmetry in the vertical direction accompanied with slower walking speed and cadence, and smaller step lengths, which can contribute to muscular imbalances and potential injury. Thus, proper rehabilitation strategies should be employed for these patients. BioMed Central 2019-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6425625/ /pubmed/30890177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-019-0644-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Hsu, Chia-Yu
Tsai, Yuh-Show
Yau, Cheng-Shiang
Shie, Hung-Hai
Wu, Chu-Ming
Differences in gait and trunk movement between patients after ankle fracture and healthy subjects
title Differences in gait and trunk movement between patients after ankle fracture and healthy subjects
title_full Differences in gait and trunk movement between patients after ankle fracture and healthy subjects
title_fullStr Differences in gait and trunk movement between patients after ankle fracture and healthy subjects
title_full_unstemmed Differences in gait and trunk movement between patients after ankle fracture and healthy subjects
title_short Differences in gait and trunk movement between patients after ankle fracture and healthy subjects
title_sort differences in gait and trunk movement between patients after ankle fracture and healthy subjects
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6425625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30890177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-019-0644-3
work_keys_str_mv AT hsuchiayu differencesingaitandtrunkmovementbetweenpatientsafteranklefractureandhealthysubjects
AT tsaiyuhshow differencesingaitandtrunkmovementbetweenpatientsafteranklefractureandhealthysubjects
AT yauchengshiang differencesingaitandtrunkmovementbetweenpatientsafteranklefractureandhealthysubjects
AT shiehunghai differencesingaitandtrunkmovementbetweenpatientsafteranklefractureandhealthysubjects
AT wuchuming differencesingaitandtrunkmovementbetweenpatientsafteranklefractureandhealthysubjects