Cargando…

Methods to increase response rates to a population-based maternity survey: a comparison of two pilot studies

BACKGROUND: Surveys are established methods for collecting population data that are unavailable from other sources; however, response rates to surveys are declining. A number of methods have been identified to increase survey returns yet response rates remain low. This paper evaluates the impact of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harrison, Siân, Henderson, Jane, Alderdice, Fiona, Quigley, Maria A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6425628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30894130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0702-3
_version_ 1783404875351064576
author Harrison, Siân
Henderson, Jane
Alderdice, Fiona
Quigley, Maria A.
author_facet Harrison, Siân
Henderson, Jane
Alderdice, Fiona
Quigley, Maria A.
author_sort Harrison, Siân
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Surveys are established methods for collecting population data that are unavailable from other sources; however, response rates to surveys are declining. A number of methods have been identified to increase survey returns yet response rates remain low. This paper evaluates the impact of five selected methods on the response rate to pilot surveys, conducted prior to a large-scale National Maternity Survey in England. METHODS: The pilot national maternity surveys were cross-sectional population-based questionnaire surveys of women who were three months postpartum selected at random from birth registrations. Women received a postal questionnaire, which they could complete on paper, online or verbally over the telephone. An initial pilot survey was conducted (pilot 1, n = 1000) to which the response rate was lower than expected. Therefore, a further pilot survey was conducted (pilot 2, n = 2000) using additional selected methods with the specific aim of increasing the response rate. The additional selected methods used for all women in pilot 2 were: pre-notification, a shorter questionnaire, more personable survey materials, an additional reminder, and inclusion of quick response (QR) codes to enable faster access to the online version of the survey. To assess the impact of the selected methods, response rates to pilot surveys 1 and 2 were compared. RESULTS: The response rate increased significantly from 28.7% in pilot 1 to 33.1% in pilot 2 (+ 4.4%, 95%CI:0.88–7.83, p = 0.02). Analysis of weekly returns according to time from initial and reminder mail-outs suggests that this increase was largely due to the additional reminder. Most respondents completed the paper questionnaire rather than taking part online or over the telephone in both pilot surveys. However, the overall response to the online questionnaire almost doubled from 1.8% in pilot 1 to 3.5% in pilot 2, corresponding to an absolute difference of 1.7% (95%CI:0.45–2.81, p = 0.01), suggesting that QR codes might have facilitated online participation. CONCLUSIONS: Declining survey response rates may be ameliorated with the use of selected methods. Further studies should evaluate the effectiveness of each of these methods using randomised controlled trials and identify novel strategies for engaging populations in survey research. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-019-0702-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6425628
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64256282019-03-29 Methods to increase response rates to a population-based maternity survey: a comparison of two pilot studies Harrison, Siân Henderson, Jane Alderdice, Fiona Quigley, Maria A. BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Surveys are established methods for collecting population data that are unavailable from other sources; however, response rates to surveys are declining. A number of methods have been identified to increase survey returns yet response rates remain low. This paper evaluates the impact of five selected methods on the response rate to pilot surveys, conducted prior to a large-scale National Maternity Survey in England. METHODS: The pilot national maternity surveys were cross-sectional population-based questionnaire surveys of women who were three months postpartum selected at random from birth registrations. Women received a postal questionnaire, which they could complete on paper, online or verbally over the telephone. An initial pilot survey was conducted (pilot 1, n = 1000) to which the response rate was lower than expected. Therefore, a further pilot survey was conducted (pilot 2, n = 2000) using additional selected methods with the specific aim of increasing the response rate. The additional selected methods used for all women in pilot 2 were: pre-notification, a shorter questionnaire, more personable survey materials, an additional reminder, and inclusion of quick response (QR) codes to enable faster access to the online version of the survey. To assess the impact of the selected methods, response rates to pilot surveys 1 and 2 were compared. RESULTS: The response rate increased significantly from 28.7% in pilot 1 to 33.1% in pilot 2 (+ 4.4%, 95%CI:0.88–7.83, p = 0.02). Analysis of weekly returns according to time from initial and reminder mail-outs suggests that this increase was largely due to the additional reminder. Most respondents completed the paper questionnaire rather than taking part online or over the telephone in both pilot surveys. However, the overall response to the online questionnaire almost doubled from 1.8% in pilot 1 to 3.5% in pilot 2, corresponding to an absolute difference of 1.7% (95%CI:0.45–2.81, p = 0.01), suggesting that QR codes might have facilitated online participation. CONCLUSIONS: Declining survey response rates may be ameliorated with the use of selected methods. Further studies should evaluate the effectiveness of each of these methods using randomised controlled trials and identify novel strategies for engaging populations in survey research. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-019-0702-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6425628/ /pubmed/30894130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0702-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Harrison, Siân
Henderson, Jane
Alderdice, Fiona
Quigley, Maria A.
Methods to increase response rates to a population-based maternity survey: a comparison of two pilot studies
title Methods to increase response rates to a population-based maternity survey: a comparison of two pilot studies
title_full Methods to increase response rates to a population-based maternity survey: a comparison of two pilot studies
title_fullStr Methods to increase response rates to a population-based maternity survey: a comparison of two pilot studies
title_full_unstemmed Methods to increase response rates to a population-based maternity survey: a comparison of two pilot studies
title_short Methods to increase response rates to a population-based maternity survey: a comparison of two pilot studies
title_sort methods to increase response rates to a population-based maternity survey: a comparison of two pilot studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6425628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30894130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0702-3
work_keys_str_mv AT harrisonsian methodstoincreaseresponseratestoapopulationbasedmaternitysurveyacomparisonoftwopilotstudies
AT hendersonjane methodstoincreaseresponseratestoapopulationbasedmaternitysurveyacomparisonoftwopilotstudies
AT alderdicefiona methodstoincreaseresponseratestoapopulationbasedmaternitysurveyacomparisonoftwopilotstudies
AT quigleymariaa methodstoincreaseresponseratestoapopulationbasedmaternitysurveyacomparisonoftwopilotstudies