Cargando…

Intimate partner violence in the Americas: a systematic review and reanalysis of national prevalence estimates

OBJECTIVES. To describe what is known about the national prevalence of intimate partner violence (IPV) against women in the Americas across countries and over time, including the geographic coverage, quality, and comparability of national data. METHODS. This was a systematic review and reanalysis of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bott, Sarah, Guedes, Alessandra, Ruiz-Celis, Ana P., Mendoza, Jennifer Adams
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Organización Panamericana de la Salud 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6425989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31093250
http://dx.doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2019.26
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES. To describe what is known about the national prevalence of intimate partner violence (IPV) against women in the Americas across countries and over time, including the geographic coverage, quality, and comparability of national data. METHODS. This was a systematic review and reanalysis of national, population-based IPV estimates from 1998 – 2017 in the Americas. Estimates were reanalyzed for comparability or extracted from reports, including IPV prevalence by type (physical; sexual; physical and/or sexual), timeframe (ever; past year), and perpetrator (any partner in life; current/most recent partner). In countries with 3+ rounds of data, Cochran-Armitage and Pearson chi-square tests were used to assess whether changes over time were significant (P < 0.05). RESULTS. Eligible surveys were found in 24 countries. Women reported ever having experienced physical and/or sexual IPV at rates that ranged from 14% – 17% of women in Brazil, Panama, and Uruguay to over one-half (58.5%) in Bolivia. Past-year prevalence of physical and/or sexual IPV ranged from 1.1% in Canada to 27.1% in Bolivia. Preliminary evidence suggests a possible decline in reported prevalence of certain types of IPV in eight countries; however, some changes were small, some indicators did not change significantly, and a significant increase was found in the reported prevalence of past-year physical IPV in the Dominican Republic. CONCLUSIONS. IPV against women remains a public health and human rights problem across the Americas; however, the evidence base has gaps, suggesting a need for more comparable, high quality evidence for mobilizing and monitoring violence prevention and response.