Cargando…
Health outcomes related to the provision of free, tangible goods: A systematic review
BACKGROUND: Free provision of tangible goods that may improve health is one approach to addressing discrepancies in health outcomes related to income, yet it is unclear whether providing goods for free improves health. We systematically reviewed the literature that reported the association between t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6426236/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30893372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213845 |
_version_ | 1783404975600173056 |
---|---|
author | Persaud, Nav Steiner, Liane Woods, Hannah Aratangy, Tatiana Wanigaratne, Susitha Polsky, Jane Hwang, Stephen Chahal, Gurleen Pinto, Andrew |
author_facet | Persaud, Nav Steiner, Liane Woods, Hannah Aratangy, Tatiana Wanigaratne, Susitha Polsky, Jane Hwang, Stephen Chahal, Gurleen Pinto, Andrew |
author_sort | Persaud, Nav |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Free provision of tangible goods that may improve health is one approach to addressing discrepancies in health outcomes related to income, yet it is unclear whether providing goods for free improves health. We systematically reviewed the literature that reported the association between the free provision of tangible goods and health outcomes. METHODS: A search was performed for relevant literature in all languages from 1995-May 2017. Eligible studies were observational and experimental which had at least one tangible item provided for free and had at least one quantitative measure of health. Studies were excluded if the intervention was primarily a service and the free good was relatively unimportant; if the good was a medication; or if the data in a study was duplicated in another study. Covidence screening software was used to manage articles for two levels of screening. Data was extracted using an adaption of the Cochrane data collection template. Health outcomes, those that affect the quality or duration of life, are the outcomes of interest. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42017069463). FINDINGS: The initial search identified 3370 articles and 59 were included in the final set with a range of 20 to 252 246 participants. The risk of bias assessment revealed that overall, the studies were of medium to high quality. Among the studies included in this review, 80 health outcomes were statistically significant favouring the intervention, 19 health outcomes were statistically significant favouring the control, 141 health outcomes were not significant and significance was unknown for 28 health outcomes. INTERPRETATION: The results of this systematic review provide evidence that free goods can improve health outcomes in certain circumstances, although there were important gaps and limitations in the existing literature. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6426236 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64262362019-04-02 Health outcomes related to the provision of free, tangible goods: A systematic review Persaud, Nav Steiner, Liane Woods, Hannah Aratangy, Tatiana Wanigaratne, Susitha Polsky, Jane Hwang, Stephen Chahal, Gurleen Pinto, Andrew PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Free provision of tangible goods that may improve health is one approach to addressing discrepancies in health outcomes related to income, yet it is unclear whether providing goods for free improves health. We systematically reviewed the literature that reported the association between the free provision of tangible goods and health outcomes. METHODS: A search was performed for relevant literature in all languages from 1995-May 2017. Eligible studies were observational and experimental which had at least one tangible item provided for free and had at least one quantitative measure of health. Studies were excluded if the intervention was primarily a service and the free good was relatively unimportant; if the good was a medication; or if the data in a study was duplicated in another study. Covidence screening software was used to manage articles for two levels of screening. Data was extracted using an adaption of the Cochrane data collection template. Health outcomes, those that affect the quality or duration of life, are the outcomes of interest. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42017069463). FINDINGS: The initial search identified 3370 articles and 59 were included in the final set with a range of 20 to 252 246 participants. The risk of bias assessment revealed that overall, the studies were of medium to high quality. Among the studies included in this review, 80 health outcomes were statistically significant favouring the intervention, 19 health outcomes were statistically significant favouring the control, 141 health outcomes were not significant and significance was unknown for 28 health outcomes. INTERPRETATION: The results of this systematic review provide evidence that free goods can improve health outcomes in certain circumstances, although there were important gaps and limitations in the existing literature. Public Library of Science 2019-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6426236/ /pubmed/30893372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213845 Text en © 2019 Persaud et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Persaud, Nav Steiner, Liane Woods, Hannah Aratangy, Tatiana Wanigaratne, Susitha Polsky, Jane Hwang, Stephen Chahal, Gurleen Pinto, Andrew Health outcomes related to the provision of free, tangible goods: A systematic review |
title | Health outcomes related to the provision of free, tangible goods: A systematic review |
title_full | Health outcomes related to the provision of free, tangible goods: A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Health outcomes related to the provision of free, tangible goods: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Health outcomes related to the provision of free, tangible goods: A systematic review |
title_short | Health outcomes related to the provision of free, tangible goods: A systematic review |
title_sort | health outcomes related to the provision of free, tangible goods: a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6426236/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30893372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213845 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT persaudnav healthoutcomesrelatedtotheprovisionoffreetangiblegoodsasystematicreview AT steinerliane healthoutcomesrelatedtotheprovisionoffreetangiblegoodsasystematicreview AT woodshannah healthoutcomesrelatedtotheprovisionoffreetangiblegoodsasystematicreview AT aratangytatiana healthoutcomesrelatedtotheprovisionoffreetangiblegoodsasystematicreview AT wanigaratnesusitha healthoutcomesrelatedtotheprovisionoffreetangiblegoodsasystematicreview AT polskyjane healthoutcomesrelatedtotheprovisionoffreetangiblegoodsasystematicreview AT hwangstephen healthoutcomesrelatedtotheprovisionoffreetangiblegoodsasystematicreview AT chahalgurleen healthoutcomesrelatedtotheprovisionoffreetangiblegoodsasystematicreview AT pintoandrew healthoutcomesrelatedtotheprovisionoffreetangiblegoodsasystematicreview |