Cargando…

Health outcomes related to the provision of free, tangible goods: A systematic review

BACKGROUND: Free provision of tangible goods that may improve health is one approach to addressing discrepancies in health outcomes related to income, yet it is unclear whether providing goods for free improves health. We systematically reviewed the literature that reported the association between t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Persaud, Nav, Steiner, Liane, Woods, Hannah, Aratangy, Tatiana, Wanigaratne, Susitha, Polsky, Jane, Hwang, Stephen, Chahal, Gurleen, Pinto, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6426236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30893372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213845
_version_ 1783404975600173056
author Persaud, Nav
Steiner, Liane
Woods, Hannah
Aratangy, Tatiana
Wanigaratne, Susitha
Polsky, Jane
Hwang, Stephen
Chahal, Gurleen
Pinto, Andrew
author_facet Persaud, Nav
Steiner, Liane
Woods, Hannah
Aratangy, Tatiana
Wanigaratne, Susitha
Polsky, Jane
Hwang, Stephen
Chahal, Gurleen
Pinto, Andrew
author_sort Persaud, Nav
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Free provision of tangible goods that may improve health is one approach to addressing discrepancies in health outcomes related to income, yet it is unclear whether providing goods for free improves health. We systematically reviewed the literature that reported the association between the free provision of tangible goods and health outcomes. METHODS: A search was performed for relevant literature in all languages from 1995-May 2017. Eligible studies were observational and experimental which had at least one tangible item provided for free and had at least one quantitative measure of health. Studies were excluded if the intervention was primarily a service and the free good was relatively unimportant; if the good was a medication; or if the data in a study was duplicated in another study. Covidence screening software was used to manage articles for two levels of screening. Data was extracted using an adaption of the Cochrane data collection template. Health outcomes, those that affect the quality or duration of life, are the outcomes of interest. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42017069463). FINDINGS: The initial search identified 3370 articles and 59 were included in the final set with a range of 20 to 252 246 participants. The risk of bias assessment revealed that overall, the studies were of medium to high quality. Among the studies included in this review, 80 health outcomes were statistically significant favouring the intervention, 19 health outcomes were statistically significant favouring the control, 141 health outcomes were not significant and significance was unknown for 28 health outcomes. INTERPRETATION: The results of this systematic review provide evidence that free goods can improve health outcomes in certain circumstances, although there were important gaps and limitations in the existing literature.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6426236
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64262362019-04-02 Health outcomes related to the provision of free, tangible goods: A systematic review Persaud, Nav Steiner, Liane Woods, Hannah Aratangy, Tatiana Wanigaratne, Susitha Polsky, Jane Hwang, Stephen Chahal, Gurleen Pinto, Andrew PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Free provision of tangible goods that may improve health is one approach to addressing discrepancies in health outcomes related to income, yet it is unclear whether providing goods for free improves health. We systematically reviewed the literature that reported the association between the free provision of tangible goods and health outcomes. METHODS: A search was performed for relevant literature in all languages from 1995-May 2017. Eligible studies were observational and experimental which had at least one tangible item provided for free and had at least one quantitative measure of health. Studies were excluded if the intervention was primarily a service and the free good was relatively unimportant; if the good was a medication; or if the data in a study was duplicated in another study. Covidence screening software was used to manage articles for two levels of screening. Data was extracted using an adaption of the Cochrane data collection template. Health outcomes, those that affect the quality or duration of life, are the outcomes of interest. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42017069463). FINDINGS: The initial search identified 3370 articles and 59 were included in the final set with a range of 20 to 252 246 participants. The risk of bias assessment revealed that overall, the studies were of medium to high quality. Among the studies included in this review, 80 health outcomes were statistically significant favouring the intervention, 19 health outcomes were statistically significant favouring the control, 141 health outcomes were not significant and significance was unknown for 28 health outcomes. INTERPRETATION: The results of this systematic review provide evidence that free goods can improve health outcomes in certain circumstances, although there were important gaps and limitations in the existing literature. Public Library of Science 2019-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6426236/ /pubmed/30893372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213845 Text en © 2019 Persaud et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Persaud, Nav
Steiner, Liane
Woods, Hannah
Aratangy, Tatiana
Wanigaratne, Susitha
Polsky, Jane
Hwang, Stephen
Chahal, Gurleen
Pinto, Andrew
Health outcomes related to the provision of free, tangible goods: A systematic review
title Health outcomes related to the provision of free, tangible goods: A systematic review
title_full Health outcomes related to the provision of free, tangible goods: A systematic review
title_fullStr Health outcomes related to the provision of free, tangible goods: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Health outcomes related to the provision of free, tangible goods: A systematic review
title_short Health outcomes related to the provision of free, tangible goods: A systematic review
title_sort health outcomes related to the provision of free, tangible goods: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6426236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30893372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213845
work_keys_str_mv AT persaudnav healthoutcomesrelatedtotheprovisionoffreetangiblegoodsasystematicreview
AT steinerliane healthoutcomesrelatedtotheprovisionoffreetangiblegoodsasystematicreview
AT woodshannah healthoutcomesrelatedtotheprovisionoffreetangiblegoodsasystematicreview
AT aratangytatiana healthoutcomesrelatedtotheprovisionoffreetangiblegoodsasystematicreview
AT wanigaratnesusitha healthoutcomesrelatedtotheprovisionoffreetangiblegoodsasystematicreview
AT polskyjane healthoutcomesrelatedtotheprovisionoffreetangiblegoodsasystematicreview
AT hwangstephen healthoutcomesrelatedtotheprovisionoffreetangiblegoodsasystematicreview
AT chahalgurleen healthoutcomesrelatedtotheprovisionoffreetangiblegoodsasystematicreview
AT pintoandrew healthoutcomesrelatedtotheprovisionoffreetangiblegoodsasystematicreview