Cargando…

False News of a Cannabis Cancer Cure

Background There is increasing concern among healthcare communities about the misinformation online about using cannabis to cure cancer. We have characterized this online interest in using cannabis as a cancer treatment and the propagation of this information on social media. Materials & methods...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shi, Siyu, Brant, Arthur R, Sabolch, Aaron, Pollom, Erqi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6426557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30931189
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.3918
_version_ 1783405028983177216
author Shi, Siyu
Brant, Arthur R
Sabolch, Aaron
Pollom, Erqi
author_facet Shi, Siyu
Brant, Arthur R
Sabolch, Aaron
Pollom, Erqi
author_sort Shi, Siyu
collection PubMed
description Background There is increasing concern among healthcare communities about the misinformation online about using cannabis to cure cancer. We have characterized this online interest in using cannabis as a cancer treatment and the propagation of this information on social media. Materials & methods We compared search activity over time for cannabis and cancer versus standard cancer therapies using Google Trends’ relative search volume (RSV) tool and determined the impact of cannabis legalization. We classified news on social media about cannabis use in cancer as false, accurate, or irrelevant. We evaluated the cannabis-related social media activities of cancer organizations. Results The online search volume for cannabis and cancer increased at 10 times the rate of standard therapies (RSV 0.10/month versus 0.01/month, p<0.001), more so in states where medical or recreational cannabis is legal. The use of cannabis as a cancer cure represented the largest category (23.5%) of social media content on alternative cancer treatments. The top false news story claiming cannabis as a cancer cure generated 4.26 million engagements on social media, while the top accurate news story debunking this false news generated 0.036 million engagements. Cancer organizations infrequently addressed cannabis (average 0.7 Tweets; 0.4 Facebook posts), with low influence compared to false news (average 5.6 versus 527 Twitter retweets; 98 versus 452,050 Facebook engagements, p<0.001). Conclusions These findings reveal a growing interest in cannabis use as a cancer cure, and a crucial opportunity for physicians and medical organizations to communicate accurate information about the role of cannabis in cancer to patients, caregivers, and the general public.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6426557
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64265572019-03-29 False News of a Cannabis Cancer Cure Shi, Siyu Brant, Arthur R Sabolch, Aaron Pollom, Erqi Cureus Oncology Background There is increasing concern among healthcare communities about the misinformation online about using cannabis to cure cancer. We have characterized this online interest in using cannabis as a cancer treatment and the propagation of this information on social media. Materials & methods We compared search activity over time for cannabis and cancer versus standard cancer therapies using Google Trends’ relative search volume (RSV) tool and determined the impact of cannabis legalization. We classified news on social media about cannabis use in cancer as false, accurate, or irrelevant. We evaluated the cannabis-related social media activities of cancer organizations. Results The online search volume for cannabis and cancer increased at 10 times the rate of standard therapies (RSV 0.10/month versus 0.01/month, p<0.001), more so in states where medical or recreational cannabis is legal. The use of cannabis as a cancer cure represented the largest category (23.5%) of social media content on alternative cancer treatments. The top false news story claiming cannabis as a cancer cure generated 4.26 million engagements on social media, while the top accurate news story debunking this false news generated 0.036 million engagements. Cancer organizations infrequently addressed cannabis (average 0.7 Tweets; 0.4 Facebook posts), with low influence compared to false news (average 5.6 versus 527 Twitter retweets; 98 versus 452,050 Facebook engagements, p<0.001). Conclusions These findings reveal a growing interest in cannabis use as a cancer cure, and a crucial opportunity for physicians and medical organizations to communicate accurate information about the role of cannabis in cancer to patients, caregivers, and the general public. Cureus 2019-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6426557/ /pubmed/30931189 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.3918 Text en Copyright © 2019, Shi et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Oncology
Shi, Siyu
Brant, Arthur R
Sabolch, Aaron
Pollom, Erqi
False News of a Cannabis Cancer Cure
title False News of a Cannabis Cancer Cure
title_full False News of a Cannabis Cancer Cure
title_fullStr False News of a Cannabis Cancer Cure
title_full_unstemmed False News of a Cannabis Cancer Cure
title_short False News of a Cannabis Cancer Cure
title_sort false news of a cannabis cancer cure
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6426557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30931189
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.3918
work_keys_str_mv AT shisiyu falsenewsofacannabiscancercure
AT brantarthurr falsenewsofacannabiscancercure
AT sabolchaaron falsenewsofacannabiscancercure
AT pollomerqi falsenewsofacannabiscancercure