Cargando…
Examining Quadratic Relationships Between Traits and Methods in Two Multitrait-Multimethod Models
Multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) analysis is one of the most frequently employed methods to examine the validity of psychological measures. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) is a commonly used analytic tool for examining MTMM data through the specification of trait and method latent variables. Most co...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6426770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30923505 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00353 |
_version_ | 1783405068584747008 |
---|---|
author | Hintz, Fred A. Geiser, Christian Burns, G. Leonard Servera, Mateu |
author_facet | Hintz, Fred A. Geiser, Christian Burns, G. Leonard Servera, Mateu |
author_sort | Hintz, Fred A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) analysis is one of the most frequently employed methods to examine the validity of psychological measures. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) is a commonly used analytic tool for examining MTMM data through the specification of trait and method latent variables. Most contemporary CFA-MTMM models either do not allow estimating correlations between the trait and method factors or they are restricted to linear trait-method relationships. There is no theoretical reason why trait and method relationships should always be linear, and quadratic relationships are frequently proposed in the social sciences. In this article, we present two approaches for examining quadratic relations between traits and methods through extended latent difference and latent means CFA-MTMM models (Pohl et al., 2008; Pohl and Steyer, 2010). An application of the new approaches to a multi-rater study of the nine inattention symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children (N = 752) and the results of a Monte Carlo study to test the applicability of the models under a variety of data conditions are described. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6426770 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64267702019-03-28 Examining Quadratic Relationships Between Traits and Methods in Two Multitrait-Multimethod Models Hintz, Fred A. Geiser, Christian Burns, G. Leonard Servera, Mateu Front Psychol Psychology Multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) analysis is one of the most frequently employed methods to examine the validity of psychological measures. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) is a commonly used analytic tool for examining MTMM data through the specification of trait and method latent variables. Most contemporary CFA-MTMM models either do not allow estimating correlations between the trait and method factors or they are restricted to linear trait-method relationships. There is no theoretical reason why trait and method relationships should always be linear, and quadratic relationships are frequently proposed in the social sciences. In this article, we present two approaches for examining quadratic relations between traits and methods through extended latent difference and latent means CFA-MTMM models (Pohl et al., 2008; Pohl and Steyer, 2010). An application of the new approaches to a multi-rater study of the nine inattention symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children (N = 752) and the results of a Monte Carlo study to test the applicability of the models under a variety of data conditions are described. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6426770/ /pubmed/30923505 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00353 Text en Copyright © 2019 Hintz, Geiser, Burns and Servera. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Hintz, Fred A. Geiser, Christian Burns, G. Leonard Servera, Mateu Examining Quadratic Relationships Between Traits and Methods in Two Multitrait-Multimethod Models |
title | Examining Quadratic Relationships Between Traits and Methods in Two Multitrait-Multimethod Models |
title_full | Examining Quadratic Relationships Between Traits and Methods in Two Multitrait-Multimethod Models |
title_fullStr | Examining Quadratic Relationships Between Traits and Methods in Two Multitrait-Multimethod Models |
title_full_unstemmed | Examining Quadratic Relationships Between Traits and Methods in Two Multitrait-Multimethod Models |
title_short | Examining Quadratic Relationships Between Traits and Methods in Two Multitrait-Multimethod Models |
title_sort | examining quadratic relationships between traits and methods in two multitrait-multimethod models |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6426770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30923505 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00353 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hintzfreda examiningquadraticrelationshipsbetweentraitsandmethodsintwomultitraitmultimethodmodels AT geiserchristian examiningquadraticrelationshipsbetweentraitsandmethodsintwomultitraitmultimethodmodels AT burnsgleonard examiningquadraticrelationshipsbetweentraitsandmethodsintwomultitraitmultimethodmodels AT serveramateu examiningquadraticrelationshipsbetweentraitsandmethodsintwomultitraitmultimethodmodels |