Cargando…

Examining Quadratic Relationships Between Traits and Methods in Two Multitrait-Multimethod Models

Multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) analysis is one of the most frequently employed methods to examine the validity of psychological measures. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) is a commonly used analytic tool for examining MTMM data through the specification of trait and method latent variables. Most co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hintz, Fred A., Geiser, Christian, Burns, G. Leonard, Servera, Mateu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6426770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30923505
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00353
_version_ 1783405068584747008
author Hintz, Fred A.
Geiser, Christian
Burns, G. Leonard
Servera, Mateu
author_facet Hintz, Fred A.
Geiser, Christian
Burns, G. Leonard
Servera, Mateu
author_sort Hintz, Fred A.
collection PubMed
description Multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) analysis is one of the most frequently employed methods to examine the validity of psychological measures. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) is a commonly used analytic tool for examining MTMM data through the specification of trait and method latent variables. Most contemporary CFA-MTMM models either do not allow estimating correlations between the trait and method factors or they are restricted to linear trait-method relationships. There is no theoretical reason why trait and method relationships should always be linear, and quadratic relationships are frequently proposed in the social sciences. In this article, we present two approaches for examining quadratic relations between traits and methods through extended latent difference and latent means CFA-MTMM models (Pohl et al., 2008; Pohl and Steyer, 2010). An application of the new approaches to a multi-rater study of the nine inattention symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children (N = 752) and the results of a Monte Carlo study to test the applicability of the models under a variety of data conditions are described.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6426770
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64267702019-03-28 Examining Quadratic Relationships Between Traits and Methods in Two Multitrait-Multimethod Models Hintz, Fred A. Geiser, Christian Burns, G. Leonard Servera, Mateu Front Psychol Psychology Multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) analysis is one of the most frequently employed methods to examine the validity of psychological measures. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) is a commonly used analytic tool for examining MTMM data through the specification of trait and method latent variables. Most contemporary CFA-MTMM models either do not allow estimating correlations between the trait and method factors or they are restricted to linear trait-method relationships. There is no theoretical reason why trait and method relationships should always be linear, and quadratic relationships are frequently proposed in the social sciences. In this article, we present two approaches for examining quadratic relations between traits and methods through extended latent difference and latent means CFA-MTMM models (Pohl et al., 2008; Pohl and Steyer, 2010). An application of the new approaches to a multi-rater study of the nine inattention symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children (N = 752) and the results of a Monte Carlo study to test the applicability of the models under a variety of data conditions are described. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6426770/ /pubmed/30923505 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00353 Text en Copyright © 2019 Hintz, Geiser, Burns and Servera. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Hintz, Fred A.
Geiser, Christian
Burns, G. Leonard
Servera, Mateu
Examining Quadratic Relationships Between Traits and Methods in Two Multitrait-Multimethod Models
title Examining Quadratic Relationships Between Traits and Methods in Two Multitrait-Multimethod Models
title_full Examining Quadratic Relationships Between Traits and Methods in Two Multitrait-Multimethod Models
title_fullStr Examining Quadratic Relationships Between Traits and Methods in Two Multitrait-Multimethod Models
title_full_unstemmed Examining Quadratic Relationships Between Traits and Methods in Two Multitrait-Multimethod Models
title_short Examining Quadratic Relationships Between Traits and Methods in Two Multitrait-Multimethod Models
title_sort examining quadratic relationships between traits and methods in two multitrait-multimethod models
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6426770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30923505
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00353
work_keys_str_mv AT hintzfreda examiningquadraticrelationshipsbetweentraitsandmethodsintwomultitraitmultimethodmodels
AT geiserchristian examiningquadraticrelationshipsbetweentraitsandmethodsintwomultitraitmultimethodmodels
AT burnsgleonard examiningquadraticrelationshipsbetweentraitsandmethodsintwomultitraitmultimethodmodels
AT serveramateu examiningquadraticrelationshipsbetweentraitsandmethodsintwomultitraitmultimethodmodels