Cargando…
Auricular prostheses attached to osseointegrated implants: multidisciplinary work-up and clinical evaluation
PURPOSE: Not long after the introduction of osseointegrated implants outside the oral cavity, auricular prostheses are retrained on osseointegrated implants. New insights have been gained with the next-generation percutaneous osseointegrated titanium implants for bone conduction hearing since its in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6426806/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30847547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05311-0 |
_version_ | 1783405077172584448 |
---|---|
author | Vijverberg, Maarten A. Verhamme, Luc van de Pol, Pascal Kunst, Henricus P. M. Mylanus, Emmanuel A. M. Hol, Myrthe K. S. |
author_facet | Vijverberg, Maarten A. Verhamme, Luc van de Pol, Pascal Kunst, Henricus P. M. Mylanus, Emmanuel A. M. Hol, Myrthe K. S. |
author_sort | Vijverberg, Maarten A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Not long after the introduction of osseointegrated implants outside the oral cavity, auricular prostheses are retrained on osseointegrated implants. New insights have been gained with the next-generation percutaneous osseointegrated titanium implants for bone conduction hearing since its introduction in 2010. As a result, the same technology was introduced in the Vistafix(®) system (VXI implant) to retain auricular prostheses. The aim of this study is to evaluate the surgical procedure, clinical outcome, and satisfaction of the patient of osseointegration-retained auricular prosthesis using VXI implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 11 patients who received an auricular prosthesis using VXI implants between December 2012 and November 2017 were evaluated retrospectively. The patient’s medical files were reviewed to assess clinical complications and the necessity for revision surgery. The subjective outcome was measured using the Glasgow benefit inventory (GBI). RESULTS: In total, 31 implants were placed in 11 patients. None of these implants were lost nor revision surgery needed. An adverse skin reaction was observed in 13.0% of the implants and in 27.2% of the patients, adequately treated with an antibiotic ointment. The average follow-up time was 2 years and 7 months. The GBI displayed a positive score in every patient. CONCLUSIONS: The VXI implants used are a safe and reliable treatment option for retaining auricular prostheses in patients with an absent auricle. Patients were satisfied with their auricular prosthesis and showed benefit in quality of life. Studies with larger numbers and preferably a prospective character are needed to draw statistically significant conclusions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6426806 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64268062019-04-05 Auricular prostheses attached to osseointegrated implants: multidisciplinary work-up and clinical evaluation Vijverberg, Maarten A. Verhamme, Luc van de Pol, Pascal Kunst, Henricus P. M. Mylanus, Emmanuel A. M. Hol, Myrthe K. S. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Otology PURPOSE: Not long after the introduction of osseointegrated implants outside the oral cavity, auricular prostheses are retrained on osseointegrated implants. New insights have been gained with the next-generation percutaneous osseointegrated titanium implants for bone conduction hearing since its introduction in 2010. As a result, the same technology was introduced in the Vistafix(®) system (VXI implant) to retain auricular prostheses. The aim of this study is to evaluate the surgical procedure, clinical outcome, and satisfaction of the patient of osseointegration-retained auricular prosthesis using VXI implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 11 patients who received an auricular prosthesis using VXI implants between December 2012 and November 2017 were evaluated retrospectively. The patient’s medical files were reviewed to assess clinical complications and the necessity for revision surgery. The subjective outcome was measured using the Glasgow benefit inventory (GBI). RESULTS: In total, 31 implants were placed in 11 patients. None of these implants were lost nor revision surgery needed. An adverse skin reaction was observed in 13.0% of the implants and in 27.2% of the patients, adequately treated with an antibiotic ointment. The average follow-up time was 2 years and 7 months. The GBI displayed a positive score in every patient. CONCLUSIONS: The VXI implants used are a safe and reliable treatment option for retaining auricular prostheses in patients with an absent auricle. Patients were satisfied with their auricular prosthesis and showed benefit in quality of life. Studies with larger numbers and preferably a prospective character are needed to draw statistically significant conclusions. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-02-05 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6426806/ /pubmed/30847547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05311-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 OpenAccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Otology Vijverberg, Maarten A. Verhamme, Luc van de Pol, Pascal Kunst, Henricus P. M. Mylanus, Emmanuel A. M. Hol, Myrthe K. S. Auricular prostheses attached to osseointegrated implants: multidisciplinary work-up and clinical evaluation |
title | Auricular prostheses attached to osseointegrated implants: multidisciplinary work-up and clinical evaluation |
title_full | Auricular prostheses attached to osseointegrated implants: multidisciplinary work-up and clinical evaluation |
title_fullStr | Auricular prostheses attached to osseointegrated implants: multidisciplinary work-up and clinical evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Auricular prostheses attached to osseointegrated implants: multidisciplinary work-up and clinical evaluation |
title_short | Auricular prostheses attached to osseointegrated implants: multidisciplinary work-up and clinical evaluation |
title_sort | auricular prostheses attached to osseointegrated implants: multidisciplinary work-up and clinical evaluation |
topic | Otology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6426806/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30847547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05311-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vijverbergmaartena auricularprosthesesattachedtoosseointegratedimplantsmultidisciplinaryworkupandclinicalevaluation AT verhammeluc auricularprosthesesattachedtoosseointegratedimplantsmultidisciplinaryworkupandclinicalevaluation AT vandepolpascal auricularprosthesesattachedtoosseointegratedimplantsmultidisciplinaryworkupandclinicalevaluation AT kunsthenricuspm auricularprosthesesattachedtoosseointegratedimplantsmultidisciplinaryworkupandclinicalevaluation AT mylanusemmanuelam auricularprosthesesattachedtoosseointegratedimplantsmultidisciplinaryworkupandclinicalevaluation AT holmyrtheks auricularprosthesesattachedtoosseointegratedimplantsmultidisciplinaryworkupandclinicalevaluation |