Cargando…
Implications of Individual QT/RR Profiles—Part 1: Inaccuracies and Problems of Population-Specific QT/Heart Rate Corrections
INTRODUCTION: Universal QT correction formulas are potentially problematic in corrected QT (QTc) interval comparisons at different heart rates. Instead of individual-specific corrections, population-specific corrections are occasionally used based on QT/RR data pooled from all study subjects. OBJECT...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6426828/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30255349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-018-0736-1 |
_version_ | 1783405082519273472 |
---|---|
author | Malik, Marek Garnett, Christine Hnatkova, Katerina Vicente, Jose Johannesen, Lars Stockbridge, Norman |
author_facet | Malik, Marek Garnett, Christine Hnatkova, Katerina Vicente, Jose Johannesen, Lars Stockbridge, Norman |
author_sort | Malik, Marek |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Universal QT correction formulas are potentially problematic in corrected QT (QTc) interval comparisons at different heart rates. Instead of individual-specific corrections, population-specific corrections are occasionally used based on QT/RR data pooled from all study subjects. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the performance of individual-specific and population-specific corrections, a statistical modeling study was performed using QT/RR data of 523 healthy subjects. METHODS: In each subject, full drug-free QT/RR profiles were available, characterized using non-linear regression models. In each subject, 50 baseline QT/RR readings represented baseline data of standard QT studies. Using these data, linear and log-linear heart rate corrections were optimized for each subject and for different groups of ten and 50 subjects. These corrections were applied in random combinations of heart rate changes between − 10 and + 25 beats per minute (bpm) and known QTc interval changes between − 25 and + 25 ms. RESULTS: Both the subject-specific and population-specific corrections based on the 50 baseline QT/RR readings tended to underestimate/overestimate the QTc interval changes when heart rate was increasing/decreasing, respectively. The result spread was much wider with population-specific corrections, making the estimates of QTc interval changes practically unpredictable. CONCLUSION: Subject-specific heart rate corrections based on limited baseline drug-free data may lead to inconsistent results and, in the presence of underlying heart rate changes, may potentially underestimate or overestimate QTc interval changes. The population-specific corrections lead to results that are much more influenced by the combination of individual QT/RR patterns than by the actual QTc interval changes. Subject-specific heart rate corrections based on full profiles derived from drug-free baseline recordings with wide QT/RR distribution should be used when studying drugs expected to cause heart rate changes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40264-018-0736-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6426828 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64268282019-04-15 Implications of Individual QT/RR Profiles—Part 1: Inaccuracies and Problems of Population-Specific QT/Heart Rate Corrections Malik, Marek Garnett, Christine Hnatkova, Katerina Vicente, Jose Johannesen, Lars Stockbridge, Norman Drug Saf Original Research Article INTRODUCTION: Universal QT correction formulas are potentially problematic in corrected QT (QTc) interval comparisons at different heart rates. Instead of individual-specific corrections, population-specific corrections are occasionally used based on QT/RR data pooled from all study subjects. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the performance of individual-specific and population-specific corrections, a statistical modeling study was performed using QT/RR data of 523 healthy subjects. METHODS: In each subject, full drug-free QT/RR profiles were available, characterized using non-linear regression models. In each subject, 50 baseline QT/RR readings represented baseline data of standard QT studies. Using these data, linear and log-linear heart rate corrections were optimized for each subject and for different groups of ten and 50 subjects. These corrections were applied in random combinations of heart rate changes between − 10 and + 25 beats per minute (bpm) and known QTc interval changes between − 25 and + 25 ms. RESULTS: Both the subject-specific and population-specific corrections based on the 50 baseline QT/RR readings tended to underestimate/overestimate the QTc interval changes when heart rate was increasing/decreasing, respectively. The result spread was much wider with population-specific corrections, making the estimates of QTc interval changes practically unpredictable. CONCLUSION: Subject-specific heart rate corrections based on limited baseline drug-free data may lead to inconsistent results and, in the presence of underlying heart rate changes, may potentially underestimate or overestimate QTc interval changes. The population-specific corrections lead to results that are much more influenced by the combination of individual QT/RR patterns than by the actual QTc interval changes. Subject-specific heart rate corrections based on full profiles derived from drug-free baseline recordings with wide QT/RR distribution should be used when studying drugs expected to cause heart rate changes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40264-018-0736-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2018-09-25 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6426828/ /pubmed/30255349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-018-0736-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2018, corrected publication 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Malik, Marek Garnett, Christine Hnatkova, Katerina Vicente, Jose Johannesen, Lars Stockbridge, Norman Implications of Individual QT/RR Profiles—Part 1: Inaccuracies and Problems of Population-Specific QT/Heart Rate Corrections |
title | Implications of Individual QT/RR Profiles—Part 1: Inaccuracies and Problems of Population-Specific QT/Heart Rate Corrections |
title_full | Implications of Individual QT/RR Profiles—Part 1: Inaccuracies and Problems of Population-Specific QT/Heart Rate Corrections |
title_fullStr | Implications of Individual QT/RR Profiles—Part 1: Inaccuracies and Problems of Population-Specific QT/Heart Rate Corrections |
title_full_unstemmed | Implications of Individual QT/RR Profiles—Part 1: Inaccuracies and Problems of Population-Specific QT/Heart Rate Corrections |
title_short | Implications of Individual QT/RR Profiles—Part 1: Inaccuracies and Problems of Population-Specific QT/Heart Rate Corrections |
title_sort | implications of individual qt/rr profiles—part 1: inaccuracies and problems of population-specific qt/heart rate corrections |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6426828/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30255349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-018-0736-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT malikmarek implicationsofindividualqtrrprofilespart1inaccuraciesandproblemsofpopulationspecificqtheartratecorrections AT garnettchristine implicationsofindividualqtrrprofilespart1inaccuraciesandproblemsofpopulationspecificqtheartratecorrections AT hnatkovakaterina implicationsofindividualqtrrprofilespart1inaccuraciesandproblemsofpopulationspecificqtheartratecorrections AT vicentejose implicationsofindividualqtrrprofilespart1inaccuraciesandproblemsofpopulationspecificqtheartratecorrections AT johannesenlars implicationsofindividualqtrrprofilespart1inaccuraciesandproblemsofpopulationspecificqtheartratecorrections AT stockbridgenorman implicationsofindividualqtrrprofilespart1inaccuraciesandproblemsofpopulationspecificqtheartratecorrections |