Cargando…

Implications of Individual QT/RR Profiles—Part 1: Inaccuracies and Problems of Population-Specific QT/Heart Rate Corrections

INTRODUCTION: Universal QT correction formulas are potentially problematic in corrected QT (QTc) interval comparisons at different heart rates. Instead of individual-specific corrections, population-specific corrections are occasionally used based on QT/RR data pooled from all study subjects. OBJECT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malik, Marek, Garnett, Christine, Hnatkova, Katerina, Vicente, Jose, Johannesen, Lars, Stockbridge, Norman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6426828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30255349
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-018-0736-1
_version_ 1783405082519273472
author Malik, Marek
Garnett, Christine
Hnatkova, Katerina
Vicente, Jose
Johannesen, Lars
Stockbridge, Norman
author_facet Malik, Marek
Garnett, Christine
Hnatkova, Katerina
Vicente, Jose
Johannesen, Lars
Stockbridge, Norman
author_sort Malik, Marek
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Universal QT correction formulas are potentially problematic in corrected QT (QTc) interval comparisons at different heart rates. Instead of individual-specific corrections, population-specific corrections are occasionally used based on QT/RR data pooled from all study subjects. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the performance of individual-specific and population-specific corrections, a statistical modeling study was performed using QT/RR data of 523 healthy subjects. METHODS: In each subject, full drug-free QT/RR profiles were available, characterized using non-linear regression models. In each subject, 50 baseline QT/RR readings represented baseline data of standard QT studies. Using these data, linear and log-linear heart rate corrections were optimized for each subject and for different groups of ten and 50 subjects. These corrections were applied in random combinations of heart rate changes between − 10 and + 25 beats per minute (bpm) and known QTc interval changes between − 25 and + 25 ms. RESULTS: Both the subject-specific and population-specific corrections based on the 50 baseline QT/RR readings tended to underestimate/overestimate the QTc interval changes when heart rate was increasing/decreasing, respectively. The result spread was much wider with population-specific corrections, making the estimates of QTc interval changes practically unpredictable. CONCLUSION: Subject-specific heart rate corrections based on limited baseline drug-free data may lead to inconsistent results and, in the presence of underlying heart rate changes, may potentially underestimate or overestimate QTc interval changes. The population-specific corrections lead to results that are much more influenced by the combination of individual QT/RR patterns than by the actual QTc interval changes. Subject-specific heart rate corrections based on full profiles derived from drug-free baseline recordings with wide QT/RR distribution should be used when studying drugs expected to cause heart rate changes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40264-018-0736-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6426828
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64268282019-04-15 Implications of Individual QT/RR Profiles—Part 1: Inaccuracies and Problems of Population-Specific QT/Heart Rate Corrections Malik, Marek Garnett, Christine Hnatkova, Katerina Vicente, Jose Johannesen, Lars Stockbridge, Norman Drug Saf Original Research Article INTRODUCTION: Universal QT correction formulas are potentially problematic in corrected QT (QTc) interval comparisons at different heart rates. Instead of individual-specific corrections, population-specific corrections are occasionally used based on QT/RR data pooled from all study subjects. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the performance of individual-specific and population-specific corrections, a statistical modeling study was performed using QT/RR data of 523 healthy subjects. METHODS: In each subject, full drug-free QT/RR profiles were available, characterized using non-linear regression models. In each subject, 50 baseline QT/RR readings represented baseline data of standard QT studies. Using these data, linear and log-linear heart rate corrections were optimized for each subject and for different groups of ten and 50 subjects. These corrections were applied in random combinations of heart rate changes between − 10 and + 25 beats per minute (bpm) and known QTc interval changes between − 25 and + 25 ms. RESULTS: Both the subject-specific and population-specific corrections based on the 50 baseline QT/RR readings tended to underestimate/overestimate the QTc interval changes when heart rate was increasing/decreasing, respectively. The result spread was much wider with population-specific corrections, making the estimates of QTc interval changes practically unpredictable. CONCLUSION: Subject-specific heart rate corrections based on limited baseline drug-free data may lead to inconsistent results and, in the presence of underlying heart rate changes, may potentially underestimate or overestimate QTc interval changes. The population-specific corrections lead to results that are much more influenced by the combination of individual QT/RR patterns than by the actual QTc interval changes. Subject-specific heart rate corrections based on full profiles derived from drug-free baseline recordings with wide QT/RR distribution should be used when studying drugs expected to cause heart rate changes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40264-018-0736-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2018-09-25 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6426828/ /pubmed/30255349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-018-0736-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2018, corrected publication 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Malik, Marek
Garnett, Christine
Hnatkova, Katerina
Vicente, Jose
Johannesen, Lars
Stockbridge, Norman
Implications of Individual QT/RR Profiles—Part 1: Inaccuracies and Problems of Population-Specific QT/Heart Rate Corrections
title Implications of Individual QT/RR Profiles—Part 1: Inaccuracies and Problems of Population-Specific QT/Heart Rate Corrections
title_full Implications of Individual QT/RR Profiles—Part 1: Inaccuracies and Problems of Population-Specific QT/Heart Rate Corrections
title_fullStr Implications of Individual QT/RR Profiles—Part 1: Inaccuracies and Problems of Population-Specific QT/Heart Rate Corrections
title_full_unstemmed Implications of Individual QT/RR Profiles—Part 1: Inaccuracies and Problems of Population-Specific QT/Heart Rate Corrections
title_short Implications of Individual QT/RR Profiles—Part 1: Inaccuracies and Problems of Population-Specific QT/Heart Rate Corrections
title_sort implications of individual qt/rr profiles—part 1: inaccuracies and problems of population-specific qt/heart rate corrections
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6426828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30255349
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-018-0736-1
work_keys_str_mv AT malikmarek implicationsofindividualqtrrprofilespart1inaccuraciesandproblemsofpopulationspecificqtheartratecorrections
AT garnettchristine implicationsofindividualqtrrprofilespart1inaccuraciesandproblemsofpopulationspecificqtheartratecorrections
AT hnatkovakaterina implicationsofindividualqtrrprofilespart1inaccuraciesandproblemsofpopulationspecificqtheartratecorrections
AT vicentejose implicationsofindividualqtrrprofilespart1inaccuraciesandproblemsofpopulationspecificqtheartratecorrections
AT johannesenlars implicationsofindividualqtrrprofilespart1inaccuraciesandproblemsofpopulationspecificqtheartratecorrections
AT stockbridgenorman implicationsofindividualqtrrprofilespart1inaccuraciesandproblemsofpopulationspecificqtheartratecorrections