Cargando…

Comparison of supine or prone crawl photon or proton breast and regional lymph node radiation therapy including the internal mammary chain

We report on a dosimetrical study comparing supine (S) and prone-crawl (P) position for radiotherapy of whole breast (WB) and loco-regional lymph node regions, including the internal mammary chain (LN_IM). Six left sided breast cancer patients were CT-simulated in S and P positions and four patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Speleers, Bruno A., Belosi, Francesca M., De Gersem, Werner R., Deseyne, Pieter R., Paelinck, Leen M., Bolsi, Alessandra, Lomax, Antony J., Boute, Bert G., Van Greveling, Annick E., Monten, Christel M., Van de Velde, Joris J., Vercauteren, Tom H., Veldeman, Liv, Weber, Damien C., De Neve, Wilfried C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6427000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30894606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41283-1
_version_ 1783405115801075712
author Speleers, Bruno A.
Belosi, Francesca M.
De Gersem, Werner R.
Deseyne, Pieter R.
Paelinck, Leen M.
Bolsi, Alessandra
Lomax, Antony J.
Boute, Bert G.
Van Greveling, Annick E.
Monten, Christel M.
Van de Velde, Joris J.
Vercauteren, Tom H.
Veldeman, Liv
Weber, Damien C.
De Neve, Wilfried C.
author_facet Speleers, Bruno A.
Belosi, Francesca M.
De Gersem, Werner R.
Deseyne, Pieter R.
Paelinck, Leen M.
Bolsi, Alessandra
Lomax, Antony J.
Boute, Bert G.
Van Greveling, Annick E.
Monten, Christel M.
Van de Velde, Joris J.
Vercauteren, Tom H.
Veldeman, Liv
Weber, Damien C.
De Neve, Wilfried C.
author_sort Speleers, Bruno A.
collection PubMed
description We report on a dosimetrical study comparing supine (S) and prone-crawl (P) position for radiotherapy of whole breast (WB) and loco-regional lymph node regions, including the internal mammary chain (LN_IM). Six left sided breast cancer patients were CT-simulated in S and P positions and four patients only in P position. Treatment plans were made using non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc photon therapy (VMAT) or pencil beam scanning intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT). Dose prescription was 15*2.67 Gy(GyRBE). The average mean heart doses for S or P VMAT were 5.6 or 4.3 Gy, respectively (p = 0.16) and 1.02 or 1.08 GyRBE, respectively for IMPT (p = 0.8; p < 0.001 for IMPT versus VMAT). The average mean lung doses for S or P VMAT were 5.91 or 2.90 Gy, respectively (p = 0.002) and 1.56 or 1.09 GyRBE, respectively for IMPT (p = 0.016). In high-risk patients, average (range) thirty-year mortality rates from radiotherapy-related cardiac injury and lung cancer were estimated at 6.8(5.4–9.4)% or 3.8(2.8–5.1)% for S or P VMAT (p < 0.001), respectively, and 1.6(1.1–2.0)% or 1.2(0.8–1.6)% for S or P IMPT (p = 0.25), respectively. Radiation-related mortality risk could outweigh the ~8% disease-specific survival benefit of WB + LN_IM radiotherapy for S VMAT but not P VMAT. IMPT carries the lowest radiation-related mortality risks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6427000
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64270002019-03-28 Comparison of supine or prone crawl photon or proton breast and regional lymph node radiation therapy including the internal mammary chain Speleers, Bruno A. Belosi, Francesca M. De Gersem, Werner R. Deseyne, Pieter R. Paelinck, Leen M. Bolsi, Alessandra Lomax, Antony J. Boute, Bert G. Van Greveling, Annick E. Monten, Christel M. Van de Velde, Joris J. Vercauteren, Tom H. Veldeman, Liv Weber, Damien C. De Neve, Wilfried C. Sci Rep Article We report on a dosimetrical study comparing supine (S) and prone-crawl (P) position for radiotherapy of whole breast (WB) and loco-regional lymph node regions, including the internal mammary chain (LN_IM). Six left sided breast cancer patients were CT-simulated in S and P positions and four patients only in P position. Treatment plans were made using non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc photon therapy (VMAT) or pencil beam scanning intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT). Dose prescription was 15*2.67 Gy(GyRBE). The average mean heart doses for S or P VMAT were 5.6 or 4.3 Gy, respectively (p = 0.16) and 1.02 or 1.08 GyRBE, respectively for IMPT (p = 0.8; p < 0.001 for IMPT versus VMAT). The average mean lung doses for S or P VMAT were 5.91 or 2.90 Gy, respectively (p = 0.002) and 1.56 or 1.09 GyRBE, respectively for IMPT (p = 0.016). In high-risk patients, average (range) thirty-year mortality rates from radiotherapy-related cardiac injury and lung cancer were estimated at 6.8(5.4–9.4)% or 3.8(2.8–5.1)% for S or P VMAT (p < 0.001), respectively, and 1.6(1.1–2.0)% or 1.2(0.8–1.6)% for S or P IMPT (p = 0.25), respectively. Radiation-related mortality risk could outweigh the ~8% disease-specific survival benefit of WB + LN_IM radiotherapy for S VMAT but not P VMAT. IMPT carries the lowest radiation-related mortality risks. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6427000/ /pubmed/30894606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41283-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Speleers, Bruno A.
Belosi, Francesca M.
De Gersem, Werner R.
Deseyne, Pieter R.
Paelinck, Leen M.
Bolsi, Alessandra
Lomax, Antony J.
Boute, Bert G.
Van Greveling, Annick E.
Monten, Christel M.
Van de Velde, Joris J.
Vercauteren, Tom H.
Veldeman, Liv
Weber, Damien C.
De Neve, Wilfried C.
Comparison of supine or prone crawl photon or proton breast and regional lymph node radiation therapy including the internal mammary chain
title Comparison of supine or prone crawl photon or proton breast and regional lymph node radiation therapy including the internal mammary chain
title_full Comparison of supine or prone crawl photon or proton breast and regional lymph node radiation therapy including the internal mammary chain
title_fullStr Comparison of supine or prone crawl photon or proton breast and regional lymph node radiation therapy including the internal mammary chain
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of supine or prone crawl photon or proton breast and regional lymph node radiation therapy including the internal mammary chain
title_short Comparison of supine or prone crawl photon or proton breast and regional lymph node radiation therapy including the internal mammary chain
title_sort comparison of supine or prone crawl photon or proton breast and regional lymph node radiation therapy including the internal mammary chain
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6427000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30894606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41283-1
work_keys_str_mv AT speleersbrunoa comparisonofsupineorpronecrawlphotonorprotonbreastandregionallymphnoderadiationtherapyincludingtheinternalmammarychain
AT belosifrancescam comparisonofsupineorpronecrawlphotonorprotonbreastandregionallymphnoderadiationtherapyincludingtheinternalmammarychain
AT degersemwernerr comparisonofsupineorpronecrawlphotonorprotonbreastandregionallymphnoderadiationtherapyincludingtheinternalmammarychain
AT deseynepieterr comparisonofsupineorpronecrawlphotonorprotonbreastandregionallymphnoderadiationtherapyincludingtheinternalmammarychain
AT paelinckleenm comparisonofsupineorpronecrawlphotonorprotonbreastandregionallymphnoderadiationtherapyincludingtheinternalmammarychain
AT bolsialessandra comparisonofsupineorpronecrawlphotonorprotonbreastandregionallymphnoderadiationtherapyincludingtheinternalmammarychain
AT lomaxantonyj comparisonofsupineorpronecrawlphotonorprotonbreastandregionallymphnoderadiationtherapyincludingtheinternalmammarychain
AT boutebertg comparisonofsupineorpronecrawlphotonorprotonbreastandregionallymphnoderadiationtherapyincludingtheinternalmammarychain
AT vangrevelingannicke comparisonofsupineorpronecrawlphotonorprotonbreastandregionallymphnoderadiationtherapyincludingtheinternalmammarychain
AT montenchristelm comparisonofsupineorpronecrawlphotonorprotonbreastandregionallymphnoderadiationtherapyincludingtheinternalmammarychain
AT vandeveldejorisj comparisonofsupineorpronecrawlphotonorprotonbreastandregionallymphnoderadiationtherapyincludingtheinternalmammarychain
AT vercauterentomh comparisonofsupineorpronecrawlphotonorprotonbreastandregionallymphnoderadiationtherapyincludingtheinternalmammarychain
AT veldemanliv comparisonofsupineorpronecrawlphotonorprotonbreastandregionallymphnoderadiationtherapyincludingtheinternalmammarychain
AT weberdamienc comparisonofsupineorpronecrawlphotonorprotonbreastandregionallymphnoderadiationtherapyincludingtheinternalmammarychain
AT denevewilfriedc comparisonofsupineorpronecrawlphotonorprotonbreastandregionallymphnoderadiationtherapyincludingtheinternalmammarychain