Cargando…
Comparison of supine or prone crawl photon or proton breast and regional lymph node radiation therapy including the internal mammary chain
We report on a dosimetrical study comparing supine (S) and prone-crawl (P) position for radiotherapy of whole breast (WB) and loco-regional lymph node regions, including the internal mammary chain (LN_IM). Six left sided breast cancer patients were CT-simulated in S and P positions and four patients...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6427000/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30894606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41283-1 |
_version_ | 1783405115801075712 |
---|---|
author | Speleers, Bruno A. Belosi, Francesca M. De Gersem, Werner R. Deseyne, Pieter R. Paelinck, Leen M. Bolsi, Alessandra Lomax, Antony J. Boute, Bert G. Van Greveling, Annick E. Monten, Christel M. Van de Velde, Joris J. Vercauteren, Tom H. Veldeman, Liv Weber, Damien C. De Neve, Wilfried C. |
author_facet | Speleers, Bruno A. Belosi, Francesca M. De Gersem, Werner R. Deseyne, Pieter R. Paelinck, Leen M. Bolsi, Alessandra Lomax, Antony J. Boute, Bert G. Van Greveling, Annick E. Monten, Christel M. Van de Velde, Joris J. Vercauteren, Tom H. Veldeman, Liv Weber, Damien C. De Neve, Wilfried C. |
author_sort | Speleers, Bruno A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We report on a dosimetrical study comparing supine (S) and prone-crawl (P) position for radiotherapy of whole breast (WB) and loco-regional lymph node regions, including the internal mammary chain (LN_IM). Six left sided breast cancer patients were CT-simulated in S and P positions and four patients only in P position. Treatment plans were made using non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc photon therapy (VMAT) or pencil beam scanning intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT). Dose prescription was 15*2.67 Gy(GyRBE). The average mean heart doses for S or P VMAT were 5.6 or 4.3 Gy, respectively (p = 0.16) and 1.02 or 1.08 GyRBE, respectively for IMPT (p = 0.8; p < 0.001 for IMPT versus VMAT). The average mean lung doses for S or P VMAT were 5.91 or 2.90 Gy, respectively (p = 0.002) and 1.56 or 1.09 GyRBE, respectively for IMPT (p = 0.016). In high-risk patients, average (range) thirty-year mortality rates from radiotherapy-related cardiac injury and lung cancer were estimated at 6.8(5.4–9.4)% or 3.8(2.8–5.1)% for S or P VMAT (p < 0.001), respectively, and 1.6(1.1–2.0)% or 1.2(0.8–1.6)% for S or P IMPT (p = 0.25), respectively. Radiation-related mortality risk could outweigh the ~8% disease-specific survival benefit of WB + LN_IM radiotherapy for S VMAT but not P VMAT. IMPT carries the lowest radiation-related mortality risks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6427000 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64270002019-03-28 Comparison of supine or prone crawl photon or proton breast and regional lymph node radiation therapy including the internal mammary chain Speleers, Bruno A. Belosi, Francesca M. De Gersem, Werner R. Deseyne, Pieter R. Paelinck, Leen M. Bolsi, Alessandra Lomax, Antony J. Boute, Bert G. Van Greveling, Annick E. Monten, Christel M. Van de Velde, Joris J. Vercauteren, Tom H. Veldeman, Liv Weber, Damien C. De Neve, Wilfried C. Sci Rep Article We report on a dosimetrical study comparing supine (S) and prone-crawl (P) position for radiotherapy of whole breast (WB) and loco-regional lymph node regions, including the internal mammary chain (LN_IM). Six left sided breast cancer patients were CT-simulated in S and P positions and four patients only in P position. Treatment plans were made using non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc photon therapy (VMAT) or pencil beam scanning intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT). Dose prescription was 15*2.67 Gy(GyRBE). The average mean heart doses for S or P VMAT were 5.6 or 4.3 Gy, respectively (p = 0.16) and 1.02 or 1.08 GyRBE, respectively for IMPT (p = 0.8; p < 0.001 for IMPT versus VMAT). The average mean lung doses for S or P VMAT were 5.91 or 2.90 Gy, respectively (p = 0.002) and 1.56 or 1.09 GyRBE, respectively for IMPT (p = 0.016). In high-risk patients, average (range) thirty-year mortality rates from radiotherapy-related cardiac injury and lung cancer were estimated at 6.8(5.4–9.4)% or 3.8(2.8–5.1)% for S or P VMAT (p < 0.001), respectively, and 1.6(1.1–2.0)% or 1.2(0.8–1.6)% for S or P IMPT (p = 0.25), respectively. Radiation-related mortality risk could outweigh the ~8% disease-specific survival benefit of WB + LN_IM radiotherapy for S VMAT but not P VMAT. IMPT carries the lowest radiation-related mortality risks. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6427000/ /pubmed/30894606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41283-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Speleers, Bruno A. Belosi, Francesca M. De Gersem, Werner R. Deseyne, Pieter R. Paelinck, Leen M. Bolsi, Alessandra Lomax, Antony J. Boute, Bert G. Van Greveling, Annick E. Monten, Christel M. Van de Velde, Joris J. Vercauteren, Tom H. Veldeman, Liv Weber, Damien C. De Neve, Wilfried C. Comparison of supine or prone crawl photon or proton breast and regional lymph node radiation therapy including the internal mammary chain |
title | Comparison of supine or prone crawl photon or proton breast and regional lymph node radiation therapy including the internal mammary chain |
title_full | Comparison of supine or prone crawl photon or proton breast and regional lymph node radiation therapy including the internal mammary chain |
title_fullStr | Comparison of supine or prone crawl photon or proton breast and regional lymph node radiation therapy including the internal mammary chain |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of supine or prone crawl photon or proton breast and regional lymph node radiation therapy including the internal mammary chain |
title_short | Comparison of supine or prone crawl photon or proton breast and regional lymph node radiation therapy including the internal mammary chain |
title_sort | comparison of supine or prone crawl photon or proton breast and regional lymph node radiation therapy including the internal mammary chain |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6427000/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30894606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41283-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT speleersbrunoa comparisonofsupineorpronecrawlphotonorprotonbreastandregionallymphnoderadiationtherapyincludingtheinternalmammarychain AT belosifrancescam comparisonofsupineorpronecrawlphotonorprotonbreastandregionallymphnoderadiationtherapyincludingtheinternalmammarychain AT degersemwernerr comparisonofsupineorpronecrawlphotonorprotonbreastandregionallymphnoderadiationtherapyincludingtheinternalmammarychain AT deseynepieterr comparisonofsupineorpronecrawlphotonorprotonbreastandregionallymphnoderadiationtherapyincludingtheinternalmammarychain AT paelinckleenm comparisonofsupineorpronecrawlphotonorprotonbreastandregionallymphnoderadiationtherapyincludingtheinternalmammarychain AT bolsialessandra comparisonofsupineorpronecrawlphotonorprotonbreastandregionallymphnoderadiationtherapyincludingtheinternalmammarychain AT lomaxantonyj comparisonofsupineorpronecrawlphotonorprotonbreastandregionallymphnoderadiationtherapyincludingtheinternalmammarychain AT boutebertg comparisonofsupineorpronecrawlphotonorprotonbreastandregionallymphnoderadiationtherapyincludingtheinternalmammarychain AT vangrevelingannicke comparisonofsupineorpronecrawlphotonorprotonbreastandregionallymphnoderadiationtherapyincludingtheinternalmammarychain AT montenchristelm comparisonofsupineorpronecrawlphotonorprotonbreastandregionallymphnoderadiationtherapyincludingtheinternalmammarychain AT vandeveldejorisj comparisonofsupineorpronecrawlphotonorprotonbreastandregionallymphnoderadiationtherapyincludingtheinternalmammarychain AT vercauterentomh comparisonofsupineorpronecrawlphotonorprotonbreastandregionallymphnoderadiationtherapyincludingtheinternalmammarychain AT veldemanliv comparisonofsupineorpronecrawlphotonorprotonbreastandregionallymphnoderadiationtherapyincludingtheinternalmammarychain AT weberdamienc comparisonofsupineorpronecrawlphotonorprotonbreastandregionallymphnoderadiationtherapyincludingtheinternalmammarychain AT denevewilfriedc comparisonofsupineorpronecrawlphotonorprotonbreastandregionallymphnoderadiationtherapyincludingtheinternalmammarychain |