Cargando…
Estimating PM(2.5) Concentrations Based on MODIS AOD and NAQPMS Data over Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei
Accurately estimating fine ambient particulate matter (PM(2.5)) is important to assess air quality and to support epidemiological studies. To analyze the spatiotemporal variation of PM(2.5) concentrations, previous studies used different methodologies, such as statistical models or neural networks,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6427133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30857313 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19051207 |
_version_ | 1783405141563539456 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Qingxin Zeng, Qiaolin Tao, Jinhua Sun, Lin Zhang, Liang Gu, Tianyu Wang, Zifeng Chen, Liangfu |
author_facet | Wang, Qingxin Zeng, Qiaolin Tao, Jinhua Sun, Lin Zhang, Liang Gu, Tianyu Wang, Zifeng Chen, Liangfu |
author_sort | Wang, Qingxin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Accurately estimating fine ambient particulate matter (PM(2.5)) is important to assess air quality and to support epidemiological studies. To analyze the spatiotemporal variation of PM(2.5) concentrations, previous studies used different methodologies, such as statistical models or neural networks, to estimate PM(2.5). However, there is little research on full-coverage PM(2.5) estimation using a combination of ground-measured, satellite-estimated, and atmospheric chemical model data. In this study, the linear mixed effect (LME) model, which used the aerosol optical depth (AOD) from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), meteorological data, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), and elevation data as predictors, was fitted for 2017 over Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH). The LME model was used to calibrate the PM(2.5) concentration using the nested air-quality prediction modeling system (NAQPMS) simulated with ground measurements. The inverse variance weighting (IVW) method was used to fuse satellite-estimated and model-calibrated PM(2.5). The results showed a strong agreement with ground measurements, with an overall coefficient (R(2)) of 0.78 and a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 26.44 μg/m(3) in cross-validation (CV). The seasonal R(2) values were 0.75, 0.62, 0.80, and 0.78 in the spring, summer, autumn, and winter, respectively. The fusion results supplement the lack of satellite estimates and can capture more detailed information than the NAQPMS model. Therefore, the results will be helpful for pollution process analyses and health-related studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6427133 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64271332019-04-15 Estimating PM(2.5) Concentrations Based on MODIS AOD and NAQPMS Data over Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Wang, Qingxin Zeng, Qiaolin Tao, Jinhua Sun, Lin Zhang, Liang Gu, Tianyu Wang, Zifeng Chen, Liangfu Sensors (Basel) Article Accurately estimating fine ambient particulate matter (PM(2.5)) is important to assess air quality and to support epidemiological studies. To analyze the spatiotemporal variation of PM(2.5) concentrations, previous studies used different methodologies, such as statistical models or neural networks, to estimate PM(2.5). However, there is little research on full-coverage PM(2.5) estimation using a combination of ground-measured, satellite-estimated, and atmospheric chemical model data. In this study, the linear mixed effect (LME) model, which used the aerosol optical depth (AOD) from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), meteorological data, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), and elevation data as predictors, was fitted for 2017 over Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH). The LME model was used to calibrate the PM(2.5) concentration using the nested air-quality prediction modeling system (NAQPMS) simulated with ground measurements. The inverse variance weighting (IVW) method was used to fuse satellite-estimated and model-calibrated PM(2.5). The results showed a strong agreement with ground measurements, with an overall coefficient (R(2)) of 0.78 and a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 26.44 μg/m(3) in cross-validation (CV). The seasonal R(2) values were 0.75, 0.62, 0.80, and 0.78 in the spring, summer, autumn, and winter, respectively. The fusion results supplement the lack of satellite estimates and can capture more detailed information than the NAQPMS model. Therefore, the results will be helpful for pollution process analyses and health-related studies. MDPI 2019-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6427133/ /pubmed/30857313 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19051207 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Wang, Qingxin Zeng, Qiaolin Tao, Jinhua Sun, Lin Zhang, Liang Gu, Tianyu Wang, Zifeng Chen, Liangfu Estimating PM(2.5) Concentrations Based on MODIS AOD and NAQPMS Data over Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei |
title | Estimating PM(2.5) Concentrations Based on MODIS AOD and NAQPMS Data over Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei |
title_full | Estimating PM(2.5) Concentrations Based on MODIS AOD and NAQPMS Data over Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei |
title_fullStr | Estimating PM(2.5) Concentrations Based on MODIS AOD and NAQPMS Data over Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei |
title_full_unstemmed | Estimating PM(2.5) Concentrations Based on MODIS AOD and NAQPMS Data over Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei |
title_short | Estimating PM(2.5) Concentrations Based on MODIS AOD and NAQPMS Data over Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei |
title_sort | estimating pm(2.5) concentrations based on modis aod and naqpms data over beijing–tianjin–hebei |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6427133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30857313 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19051207 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangqingxin estimatingpm25concentrationsbasedonmodisaodandnaqpmsdataoverbeijingtianjinhebei AT zengqiaolin estimatingpm25concentrationsbasedonmodisaodandnaqpmsdataoverbeijingtianjinhebei AT taojinhua estimatingpm25concentrationsbasedonmodisaodandnaqpmsdataoverbeijingtianjinhebei AT sunlin estimatingpm25concentrationsbasedonmodisaodandnaqpmsdataoverbeijingtianjinhebei AT zhangliang estimatingpm25concentrationsbasedonmodisaodandnaqpmsdataoverbeijingtianjinhebei AT gutianyu estimatingpm25concentrationsbasedonmodisaodandnaqpmsdataoverbeijingtianjinhebei AT wangzifeng estimatingpm25concentrationsbasedonmodisaodandnaqpmsdataoverbeijingtianjinhebei AT chenliangfu estimatingpm25concentrationsbasedonmodisaodandnaqpmsdataoverbeijingtianjinhebei |