Cargando…

Estimating PM(2.5) Concentrations Based on MODIS AOD and NAQPMS Data over Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei

Accurately estimating fine ambient particulate matter (PM(2.5)) is important to assess air quality and to support epidemiological studies. To analyze the spatiotemporal variation of PM(2.5) concentrations, previous studies used different methodologies, such as statistical models or neural networks,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Qingxin, Zeng, Qiaolin, Tao, Jinhua, Sun, Lin, Zhang, Liang, Gu, Tianyu, Wang, Zifeng, Chen, Liangfu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6427133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30857313
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19051207
_version_ 1783405141563539456
author Wang, Qingxin
Zeng, Qiaolin
Tao, Jinhua
Sun, Lin
Zhang, Liang
Gu, Tianyu
Wang, Zifeng
Chen, Liangfu
author_facet Wang, Qingxin
Zeng, Qiaolin
Tao, Jinhua
Sun, Lin
Zhang, Liang
Gu, Tianyu
Wang, Zifeng
Chen, Liangfu
author_sort Wang, Qingxin
collection PubMed
description Accurately estimating fine ambient particulate matter (PM(2.5)) is important to assess air quality and to support epidemiological studies. To analyze the spatiotemporal variation of PM(2.5) concentrations, previous studies used different methodologies, such as statistical models or neural networks, to estimate PM(2.5). However, there is little research on full-coverage PM(2.5) estimation using a combination of ground-measured, satellite-estimated, and atmospheric chemical model data. In this study, the linear mixed effect (LME) model, which used the aerosol optical depth (AOD) from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), meteorological data, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), and elevation data as predictors, was fitted for 2017 over Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH). The LME model was used to calibrate the PM(2.5) concentration using the nested air-quality prediction modeling system (NAQPMS) simulated with ground measurements. The inverse variance weighting (IVW) method was used to fuse satellite-estimated and model-calibrated PM(2.5). The results showed a strong agreement with ground measurements, with an overall coefficient (R(2)) of 0.78 and a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 26.44 μg/m(3) in cross-validation (CV). The seasonal R(2) values were 0.75, 0.62, 0.80, and 0.78 in the spring, summer, autumn, and winter, respectively. The fusion results supplement the lack of satellite estimates and can capture more detailed information than the NAQPMS model. Therefore, the results will be helpful for pollution process analyses and health-related studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6427133
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64271332019-04-15 Estimating PM(2.5) Concentrations Based on MODIS AOD and NAQPMS Data over Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Wang, Qingxin Zeng, Qiaolin Tao, Jinhua Sun, Lin Zhang, Liang Gu, Tianyu Wang, Zifeng Chen, Liangfu Sensors (Basel) Article Accurately estimating fine ambient particulate matter (PM(2.5)) is important to assess air quality and to support epidemiological studies. To analyze the spatiotemporal variation of PM(2.5) concentrations, previous studies used different methodologies, such as statistical models or neural networks, to estimate PM(2.5). However, there is little research on full-coverage PM(2.5) estimation using a combination of ground-measured, satellite-estimated, and atmospheric chemical model data. In this study, the linear mixed effect (LME) model, which used the aerosol optical depth (AOD) from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), meteorological data, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), and elevation data as predictors, was fitted for 2017 over Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH). The LME model was used to calibrate the PM(2.5) concentration using the nested air-quality prediction modeling system (NAQPMS) simulated with ground measurements. The inverse variance weighting (IVW) method was used to fuse satellite-estimated and model-calibrated PM(2.5). The results showed a strong agreement with ground measurements, with an overall coefficient (R(2)) of 0.78 and a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 26.44 μg/m(3) in cross-validation (CV). The seasonal R(2) values were 0.75, 0.62, 0.80, and 0.78 in the spring, summer, autumn, and winter, respectively. The fusion results supplement the lack of satellite estimates and can capture more detailed information than the NAQPMS model. Therefore, the results will be helpful for pollution process analyses and health-related studies. MDPI 2019-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6427133/ /pubmed/30857313 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19051207 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wang, Qingxin
Zeng, Qiaolin
Tao, Jinhua
Sun, Lin
Zhang, Liang
Gu, Tianyu
Wang, Zifeng
Chen, Liangfu
Estimating PM(2.5) Concentrations Based on MODIS AOD and NAQPMS Data over Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei
title Estimating PM(2.5) Concentrations Based on MODIS AOD and NAQPMS Data over Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei
title_full Estimating PM(2.5) Concentrations Based on MODIS AOD and NAQPMS Data over Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei
title_fullStr Estimating PM(2.5) Concentrations Based on MODIS AOD and NAQPMS Data over Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei
title_full_unstemmed Estimating PM(2.5) Concentrations Based on MODIS AOD and NAQPMS Data over Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei
title_short Estimating PM(2.5) Concentrations Based on MODIS AOD and NAQPMS Data over Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei
title_sort estimating pm(2.5) concentrations based on modis aod and naqpms data over beijing–tianjin–hebei
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6427133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30857313
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19051207
work_keys_str_mv AT wangqingxin estimatingpm25concentrationsbasedonmodisaodandnaqpmsdataoverbeijingtianjinhebei
AT zengqiaolin estimatingpm25concentrationsbasedonmodisaodandnaqpmsdataoverbeijingtianjinhebei
AT taojinhua estimatingpm25concentrationsbasedonmodisaodandnaqpmsdataoverbeijingtianjinhebei
AT sunlin estimatingpm25concentrationsbasedonmodisaodandnaqpmsdataoverbeijingtianjinhebei
AT zhangliang estimatingpm25concentrationsbasedonmodisaodandnaqpmsdataoverbeijingtianjinhebei
AT gutianyu estimatingpm25concentrationsbasedonmodisaodandnaqpmsdataoverbeijingtianjinhebei
AT wangzifeng estimatingpm25concentrationsbasedonmodisaodandnaqpmsdataoverbeijingtianjinhebei
AT chenliangfu estimatingpm25concentrationsbasedonmodisaodandnaqpmsdataoverbeijingtianjinhebei