Cargando…

Effectiveness Studies in Health Promotion: A Review of the Methodological Quality of Studies Reporting Significant Effects on Physical Activity in Working Age Adults

The methodology of intervention studies on physical activity (PA) promotion is of great importance regarding evidence development in complex interventions. The aim of this review was to provide an overview of the methodological quality of those studies which reported statistically significant effect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rudolf, Kevin, Dejonghe, Lea A. L., Froböse, Ingo, Lammer, Florian, Rückel, Lisa-Marie, Tetz, Jessica, Schaller, Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6427597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30845673
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16050813
_version_ 1783405247253708800
author Rudolf, Kevin
Dejonghe, Lea A. L.
Froböse, Ingo
Lammer, Florian
Rückel, Lisa-Marie
Tetz, Jessica
Schaller, Andrea
author_facet Rudolf, Kevin
Dejonghe, Lea A. L.
Froböse, Ingo
Lammer, Florian
Rückel, Lisa-Marie
Tetz, Jessica
Schaller, Andrea
author_sort Rudolf, Kevin
collection PubMed
description The methodology of intervention studies on physical activity (PA) promotion is of great importance regarding evidence development in complex interventions. The aim of this review was to provide an overview of the methodological quality of those studies which reported statistically significant effects of interventions promoting PA. PUBMED was searched for reviews on PA promotion to identify studies reporting effective interventions with participants of working age (16–67 years). Selected reviews were screened and data from primary studies with effective interventions were extracted to assess methodological quality. Forty-six reviews with 600 primary studies were identified, of which 33 met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-one studies were conducted as randomized controlled trials, 13 included an intervention control group, 25 measured PA by questionnaire, and 13 included objective measurements. Information on used statistics was often scarce, and long-term follow-up measurements were frequently missing. The overall methodological quality was moderate for randomized studies and low for non-randomized studies; information on methods and results was often lacking. To overcome these methodological issues, standardized guidelines for reporting study results should be considered, not only when publishing results but also when designing studies. This review provides a solid foundation for the development of practical advice for planning application-oriented studies in PA promotion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6427597
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64275972019-04-10 Effectiveness Studies in Health Promotion: A Review of the Methodological Quality of Studies Reporting Significant Effects on Physical Activity in Working Age Adults Rudolf, Kevin Dejonghe, Lea A. L. Froböse, Ingo Lammer, Florian Rückel, Lisa-Marie Tetz, Jessica Schaller, Andrea Int J Environ Res Public Health Review The methodology of intervention studies on physical activity (PA) promotion is of great importance regarding evidence development in complex interventions. The aim of this review was to provide an overview of the methodological quality of those studies which reported statistically significant effects of interventions promoting PA. PUBMED was searched for reviews on PA promotion to identify studies reporting effective interventions with participants of working age (16–67 years). Selected reviews were screened and data from primary studies with effective interventions were extracted to assess methodological quality. Forty-six reviews with 600 primary studies were identified, of which 33 met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-one studies were conducted as randomized controlled trials, 13 included an intervention control group, 25 measured PA by questionnaire, and 13 included objective measurements. Information on used statistics was often scarce, and long-term follow-up measurements were frequently missing. The overall methodological quality was moderate for randomized studies and low for non-randomized studies; information on methods and results was often lacking. To overcome these methodological issues, standardized guidelines for reporting study results should be considered, not only when publishing results but also when designing studies. This review provides a solid foundation for the development of practical advice for planning application-oriented studies in PA promotion. MDPI 2019-03-06 2019-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6427597/ /pubmed/30845673 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16050813 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Rudolf, Kevin
Dejonghe, Lea A. L.
Froböse, Ingo
Lammer, Florian
Rückel, Lisa-Marie
Tetz, Jessica
Schaller, Andrea
Effectiveness Studies in Health Promotion: A Review of the Methodological Quality of Studies Reporting Significant Effects on Physical Activity in Working Age Adults
title Effectiveness Studies in Health Promotion: A Review of the Methodological Quality of Studies Reporting Significant Effects on Physical Activity in Working Age Adults
title_full Effectiveness Studies in Health Promotion: A Review of the Methodological Quality of Studies Reporting Significant Effects on Physical Activity in Working Age Adults
title_fullStr Effectiveness Studies in Health Promotion: A Review of the Methodological Quality of Studies Reporting Significant Effects on Physical Activity in Working Age Adults
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness Studies in Health Promotion: A Review of the Methodological Quality of Studies Reporting Significant Effects on Physical Activity in Working Age Adults
title_short Effectiveness Studies in Health Promotion: A Review of the Methodological Quality of Studies Reporting Significant Effects on Physical Activity in Working Age Adults
title_sort effectiveness studies in health promotion: a review of the methodological quality of studies reporting significant effects on physical activity in working age adults
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6427597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30845673
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16050813
work_keys_str_mv AT rudolfkevin effectivenessstudiesinhealthpromotionareviewofthemethodologicalqualityofstudiesreportingsignificanteffectsonphysicalactivityinworkingageadults
AT dejongheleaal effectivenessstudiesinhealthpromotionareviewofthemethodologicalqualityofstudiesreportingsignificanteffectsonphysicalactivityinworkingageadults
AT froboseingo effectivenessstudiesinhealthpromotionareviewofthemethodologicalqualityofstudiesreportingsignificanteffectsonphysicalactivityinworkingageadults
AT lammerflorian effectivenessstudiesinhealthpromotionareviewofthemethodologicalqualityofstudiesreportingsignificanteffectsonphysicalactivityinworkingageadults
AT ruckellisamarie effectivenessstudiesinhealthpromotionareviewofthemethodologicalqualityofstudiesreportingsignificanteffectsonphysicalactivityinworkingageadults
AT tetzjessica effectivenessstudiesinhealthpromotionareviewofthemethodologicalqualityofstudiesreportingsignificanteffectsonphysicalactivityinworkingageadults
AT schallerandrea effectivenessstudiesinhealthpromotionareviewofthemethodologicalqualityofstudiesreportingsignificanteffectsonphysicalactivityinworkingageadults