Cargando…

Basic Life Support Training Methods for Health Science Students: A Systematic Review

The acquisition of competencies in basic life support (BLS) among university students of health sciences requires specific and updated training; therefore, the aim of this review was to identify, evaluate, and synthesise the available scientific knowledge on the effect of training in cardiorespirato...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: García-Suárez, Mario, Méndez-Martínez, Carlos, Martínez-Isasi, Santiago, Gómez-Salgado, Juan, Fernández-García, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6427599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30832440
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16050768
_version_ 1783405247701450752
author García-Suárez, Mario
Méndez-Martínez, Carlos
Martínez-Isasi, Santiago
Gómez-Salgado, Juan
Fernández-García, Daniel
author_facet García-Suárez, Mario
Méndez-Martínez, Carlos
Martínez-Isasi, Santiago
Gómez-Salgado, Juan
Fernández-García, Daniel
author_sort García-Suárez, Mario
collection PubMed
description The acquisition of competencies in basic life support (BLS) among university students of health sciences requires specific and updated training; therefore, the aim of this review was to identify, evaluate, and synthesise the available scientific knowledge on the effect of training in cardiorespiratory resuscitation in this population. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, CUIDEN, Web of Science, Wiley Online Library, CINAHL, and Cochrane, including all randomised clinical trials published in the last ten years that evaluated basic life support training methods among these students. We selected a total of 11 randomissed clinical trials that met the inclusion criteria. Participants were nursing and medicine students who received theoretical and practical training in basic life support. The studies showed a great heterogeneity in training methods and evaluators, as did the feedback devices used in the practical evaluations and in the measurement of quality of cardiorespiratory resuscitation. In spite of the variety of information resulting from the training methods in basic life support, we conclude that mannequins with voice-guided feedback proved to be more effective than the other resources analysed for learning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6427599
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64275992019-04-10 Basic Life Support Training Methods for Health Science Students: A Systematic Review García-Suárez, Mario Méndez-Martínez, Carlos Martínez-Isasi, Santiago Gómez-Salgado, Juan Fernández-García, Daniel Int J Environ Res Public Health Review The acquisition of competencies in basic life support (BLS) among university students of health sciences requires specific and updated training; therefore, the aim of this review was to identify, evaluate, and synthesise the available scientific knowledge on the effect of training in cardiorespiratory resuscitation in this population. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, CUIDEN, Web of Science, Wiley Online Library, CINAHL, and Cochrane, including all randomised clinical trials published in the last ten years that evaluated basic life support training methods among these students. We selected a total of 11 randomissed clinical trials that met the inclusion criteria. Participants were nursing and medicine students who received theoretical and practical training in basic life support. The studies showed a great heterogeneity in training methods and evaluators, as did the feedback devices used in the practical evaluations and in the measurement of quality of cardiorespiratory resuscitation. In spite of the variety of information resulting from the training methods in basic life support, we conclude that mannequins with voice-guided feedback proved to be more effective than the other resources analysed for learning. MDPI 2019-03-03 2019-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6427599/ /pubmed/30832440 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16050768 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
García-Suárez, Mario
Méndez-Martínez, Carlos
Martínez-Isasi, Santiago
Gómez-Salgado, Juan
Fernández-García, Daniel
Basic Life Support Training Methods for Health Science Students: A Systematic Review
title Basic Life Support Training Methods for Health Science Students: A Systematic Review
title_full Basic Life Support Training Methods for Health Science Students: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Basic Life Support Training Methods for Health Science Students: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Basic Life Support Training Methods for Health Science Students: A Systematic Review
title_short Basic Life Support Training Methods for Health Science Students: A Systematic Review
title_sort basic life support training methods for health science students: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6427599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30832440
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16050768
work_keys_str_mv AT garciasuarezmario basiclifesupporttrainingmethodsforhealthsciencestudentsasystematicreview
AT mendezmartinezcarlos basiclifesupporttrainingmethodsforhealthsciencestudentsasystematicreview
AT martinezisasisantiago basiclifesupporttrainingmethodsforhealthsciencestudentsasystematicreview
AT gomezsalgadojuan basiclifesupporttrainingmethodsforhealthsciencestudentsasystematicreview
AT fernandezgarciadaniel basiclifesupporttrainingmethodsforhealthsciencestudentsasystematicreview