Cargando…
A New Way to Look at the Data: Similarities Between Groups of People Are Large and Important
Most published research focuses on describing differences, while neglecting similarities that are arguably at least as interesting and important. In Study 1, we modified and extended prior procedures for describing similarities and demonstrate the importance of this exercise by examining similaritie...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Psychological Association
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6428189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30596430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000154 |
_version_ | 1783405365146157056 |
---|---|
author | Hanel, Paul H. P. Maio, Gregory R. Manstead, Antony S. R. |
author_facet | Hanel, Paul H. P. Maio, Gregory R. Manstead, Antony S. R. |
author_sort | Hanel, Paul H. P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Most published research focuses on describing differences, while neglecting similarities that are arguably at least as interesting and important. In Study 1, we modified and extended prior procedures for describing similarities and demonstrate the importance of this exercise by examining similarities between groups on 22 social variables (e.g., moral attitudes, human values, and trust) within 6 commonly used social categories: gender, age, education, income, nation of residence, and religious denomination (N = 86,272). On average, the amount of similarity between 2 groups (e.g., high vs. low educated or different countries) was greater than 90%. Even large effect sizes revealed more similarities than differences between groups. Studies 2–5 demonstrated the importance of presenting information about similarity in research reports. Compared with the typical presentation of differences (e.g., barplots with confidence intervals), similarity information led to more accurate lay perceptions and to more positive attitudes toward an outgroup. Barplots with a restricted y-axis led to a gross underestimation of similarities (i.e., a gross overestimation of the differences), and information about similarities was rated as more comprehensible. Overall, the presentation of similarity information achieves more balanced scientific communication and may help address the file drawer problem. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6428189 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | American Psychological Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64281892019-03-25 A New Way to Look at the Data: Similarities Between Groups of People Are Large and Important Hanel, Paul H. P. Maio, Gregory R. Manstead, Antony S. R. J Pers Soc Psychol Article Most published research focuses on describing differences, while neglecting similarities that are arguably at least as interesting and important. In Study 1, we modified and extended prior procedures for describing similarities and demonstrate the importance of this exercise by examining similarities between groups on 22 social variables (e.g., moral attitudes, human values, and trust) within 6 commonly used social categories: gender, age, education, income, nation of residence, and religious denomination (N = 86,272). On average, the amount of similarity between 2 groups (e.g., high vs. low educated or different countries) was greater than 90%. Even large effect sizes revealed more similarities than differences between groups. Studies 2–5 demonstrated the importance of presenting information about similarity in research reports. Compared with the typical presentation of differences (e.g., barplots with confidence intervals), similarity information led to more accurate lay perceptions and to more positive attitudes toward an outgroup. Barplots with a restricted y-axis led to a gross underestimation of similarities (i.e., a gross overestimation of the differences), and information about similarities was rated as more comprehensible. Overall, the presentation of similarity information achieves more balanced scientific communication and may help address the file drawer problem. American Psychological Association 2018-12-31 2019-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6428189/ /pubmed/30596430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000154 Text en © 2018 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article has been published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s). Author(s) grant(s) the American Psychological Association the exclusive right to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher. |
spellingShingle | Article Hanel, Paul H. P. Maio, Gregory R. Manstead, Antony S. R. A New Way to Look at the Data: Similarities Between Groups of People Are Large and Important |
title | A New Way to Look at the Data: Similarities Between Groups of People Are Large and Important |
title_full | A New Way to Look at the Data: Similarities Between Groups of People Are Large and Important |
title_fullStr | A New Way to Look at the Data: Similarities Between Groups of People Are Large and Important |
title_full_unstemmed | A New Way to Look at the Data: Similarities Between Groups of People Are Large and Important |
title_short | A New Way to Look at the Data: Similarities Between Groups of People Are Large and Important |
title_sort | new way to look at the data: similarities between groups of people are large and important |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6428189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30596430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000154 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hanelpaulhp anewwaytolookatthedatasimilaritiesbetweengroupsofpeoplearelargeandimportant AT maiogregoryr anewwaytolookatthedatasimilaritiesbetweengroupsofpeoplearelargeandimportant AT mansteadantonysr anewwaytolookatthedatasimilaritiesbetweengroupsofpeoplearelargeandimportant AT hanelpaulhp newwaytolookatthedatasimilaritiesbetweengroupsofpeoplearelargeandimportant AT maiogregoryr newwaytolookatthedatasimilaritiesbetweengroupsofpeoplearelargeandimportant AT mansteadantonysr newwaytolookatthedatasimilaritiesbetweengroupsofpeoplearelargeandimportant |