Cargando…

Lymph Node Ratio: Is It an Independent Prognostic Factor for Stage III Cutaneous Melanoma?

OBJECTIVE: Lymph node ratio (LNR) is defined as the ratio of the number of metastatic lymph nodes to the dissected lymph nodes. LNR is a prognostic factor for many tumor types. The present study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of LNR in melanoma. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salari, Abolfazl, Nili, Fatemeh, Jalaeefar, Amir Mohsen, Shirkhoda, Mohammad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6428529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30583691
http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2018.19.12.3623
_version_ 1783405411172352000
author Salari, Abolfazl
Nili, Fatemeh
Jalaeefar, Amir Mohsen
Shirkhoda, Mohammad
author_facet Salari, Abolfazl
Nili, Fatemeh
Jalaeefar, Amir Mohsen
Shirkhoda, Mohammad
author_sort Salari, Abolfazl
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Lymph node ratio (LNR) is defined as the ratio of the number of metastatic lymph nodes to the dissected lymph nodes. LNR is a prognostic factor for many tumor types. The present study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of LNR in melanoma. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted on 123 patients with stage III cutaneous melanoma. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the correlations between LNR and other clinicopathological factors associated with survival. The patients were divided into four groups in terms of the LNR, including groups A (LNR≤0.18), B (0.18<LNR≤0.37), C (0.37<LNR≤0.625), and D (LNR>0.625). RESULTS: Initially, LNR was evaluated as a continuous quantity associated with survival. In the univariate analysis, a significant correlation was observed between LNR, overall survival (OS), and disease free survival (DFS). Meanwhile, the only association observed in the multivariate analysis was between LNR and OS. Increased LNR from group A to group D reduced OS from 46 (±44.09) to 22.5 (±16.33) months (P=0.022). According to the multivariate analysis, prognostic factors in OS were tumor thickness, American joint committee of cancer (AJCC) N stage, interferon administration, and undergoing chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: According to the results, LNR could be used as an independent prognostic factor for estimating the survival of patients with stage III cutaneous melanoma also designing an effective adjuvant treatment protocol for these patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6428529
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64285292019-04-01 Lymph Node Ratio: Is It an Independent Prognostic Factor for Stage III Cutaneous Melanoma? Salari, Abolfazl Nili, Fatemeh Jalaeefar, Amir Mohsen Shirkhoda, Mohammad Asian Pac J Cancer Prev Research Article OBJECTIVE: Lymph node ratio (LNR) is defined as the ratio of the number of metastatic lymph nodes to the dissected lymph nodes. LNR is a prognostic factor for many tumor types. The present study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of LNR in melanoma. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted on 123 patients with stage III cutaneous melanoma. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the correlations between LNR and other clinicopathological factors associated with survival. The patients were divided into four groups in terms of the LNR, including groups A (LNR≤0.18), B (0.18<LNR≤0.37), C (0.37<LNR≤0.625), and D (LNR>0.625). RESULTS: Initially, LNR was evaluated as a continuous quantity associated with survival. In the univariate analysis, a significant correlation was observed between LNR, overall survival (OS), and disease free survival (DFS). Meanwhile, the only association observed in the multivariate analysis was between LNR and OS. Increased LNR from group A to group D reduced OS from 46 (±44.09) to 22.5 (±16.33) months (P=0.022). According to the multivariate analysis, prognostic factors in OS were tumor thickness, American joint committee of cancer (AJCC) N stage, interferon administration, and undergoing chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: According to the results, LNR could be used as an independent prognostic factor for estimating the survival of patients with stage III cutaneous melanoma also designing an effective adjuvant treatment protocol for these patients. West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6428529/ /pubmed/30583691 http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2018.19.12.3623 Text en Copyright: © Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY-SA/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Research Article
Salari, Abolfazl
Nili, Fatemeh
Jalaeefar, Amir Mohsen
Shirkhoda, Mohammad
Lymph Node Ratio: Is It an Independent Prognostic Factor for Stage III Cutaneous Melanoma?
title Lymph Node Ratio: Is It an Independent Prognostic Factor for Stage III Cutaneous Melanoma?
title_full Lymph Node Ratio: Is It an Independent Prognostic Factor for Stage III Cutaneous Melanoma?
title_fullStr Lymph Node Ratio: Is It an Independent Prognostic Factor for Stage III Cutaneous Melanoma?
title_full_unstemmed Lymph Node Ratio: Is It an Independent Prognostic Factor for Stage III Cutaneous Melanoma?
title_short Lymph Node Ratio: Is It an Independent Prognostic Factor for Stage III Cutaneous Melanoma?
title_sort lymph node ratio: is it an independent prognostic factor for stage iii cutaneous melanoma?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6428529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30583691
http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2018.19.12.3623
work_keys_str_mv AT salariabolfazl lymphnoderatioisitanindependentprognosticfactorforstageiiicutaneousmelanoma
AT nilifatemeh lymphnoderatioisitanindependentprognosticfactorforstageiiicutaneousmelanoma
AT jalaeefaramirmohsen lymphnoderatioisitanindependentprognosticfactorforstageiiicutaneousmelanoma
AT shirkhodamohammad lymphnoderatioisitanindependentprognosticfactorforstageiiicutaneousmelanoma