Cargando…

Simulation Models in Gastric Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Together with such high-quality approaches as randomized controlled trials and large-scale cohort studies, simulation models are often employed to evaluate the effect of cancer screening methods and decide on their appropriateness. This study aimed to evaluate all effects of gastric canc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matsuda, Ayako, Saika, Kumiko, Tanaka, Rina, Ito, Yuri, Fukui, Keisuke, Kamo, Ken-ichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6428531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30583337
http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2018.19.12.3321
_version_ 1783405411631628288
author Matsuda, Ayako
Saika, Kumiko
Tanaka, Rina
Ito, Yuri
Fukui, Keisuke
Kamo, Ken-ichi
author_facet Matsuda, Ayako
Saika, Kumiko
Tanaka, Rina
Ito, Yuri
Fukui, Keisuke
Kamo, Ken-ichi
author_sort Matsuda, Ayako
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Together with such high-quality approaches as randomized controlled trials and large-scale cohort studies, simulation models are often employed to evaluate the effect of cancer screening methods and decide on their appropriateness. This study aimed to evaluate all effects of gastric cancer screening that have been assessed using simulation models, including cost-effectiveness, mortality reduction, and early-stage detection. METHODS: We performed a systematic review using PubMed and Web of Science. We evaluated the effect of screening related to cost, such as incremental cost-effectiveness and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios; we also separately assessed effects other than cost, such as quality-adjusted life-years, number of deaths prevented, life-years saved, relative risk of mortality from gastric cancer, life expectancy, and incidence reduction. The methods targeted for evaluation were Helicobacter pylori testing or endoscopy. RESULTS: We identified 19 studies dealing with simulation models in gastric cancer screenings: 14 examined H. pylori screening and 7 focused on endoscopy. Among those studies, two assessed both H. pylori and endoscopy screening. Most of the studies adopted a Markov model, and all the studies evaluated cost-effectiveness. Of the 14 H. pylori screening studies, 13 demonstrated cost-effectiveness and 11 also showed good results other than cost-effectiveness, such as extension of life-years and increase in early-stage detection. In three of the five endoscopy studies, the target population was patients; all five studies obtained good results for cost-effectiveness and four observed good results other than for cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we showed that the H. pylori screening test was cost-effective in terms of simulation model investigations. However, the H. pylori screening test should not ordinarily be recommended since there is insufficient evidence that it reduces gastric cancer mortality. In Japan, simulation modeling should be employed to plan for cancer control, and the appropriate use of simulation models should be examined for future use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6428531
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64285312019-04-01 Simulation Models in Gastric Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review Matsuda, Ayako Saika, Kumiko Tanaka, Rina Ito, Yuri Fukui, Keisuke Kamo, Ken-ichi Asian Pac J Cancer Prev Review BACKGROUND: Together with such high-quality approaches as randomized controlled trials and large-scale cohort studies, simulation models are often employed to evaluate the effect of cancer screening methods and decide on their appropriateness. This study aimed to evaluate all effects of gastric cancer screening that have been assessed using simulation models, including cost-effectiveness, mortality reduction, and early-stage detection. METHODS: We performed a systematic review using PubMed and Web of Science. We evaluated the effect of screening related to cost, such as incremental cost-effectiveness and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios; we also separately assessed effects other than cost, such as quality-adjusted life-years, number of deaths prevented, life-years saved, relative risk of mortality from gastric cancer, life expectancy, and incidence reduction. The methods targeted for evaluation were Helicobacter pylori testing or endoscopy. RESULTS: We identified 19 studies dealing with simulation models in gastric cancer screenings: 14 examined H. pylori screening and 7 focused on endoscopy. Among those studies, two assessed both H. pylori and endoscopy screening. Most of the studies adopted a Markov model, and all the studies evaluated cost-effectiveness. Of the 14 H. pylori screening studies, 13 demonstrated cost-effectiveness and 11 also showed good results other than cost-effectiveness, such as extension of life-years and increase in early-stage detection. In three of the five endoscopy studies, the target population was patients; all five studies obtained good results for cost-effectiveness and four observed good results other than for cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we showed that the H. pylori screening test was cost-effective in terms of simulation model investigations. However, the H. pylori screening test should not ordinarily be recommended since there is insufficient evidence that it reduces gastric cancer mortality. In Japan, simulation modeling should be employed to plan for cancer control, and the appropriate use of simulation models should be examined for future use. West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6428531/ /pubmed/30583337 http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2018.19.12.3321 Text en Copyright: © Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY-SA/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Review
Matsuda, Ayako
Saika, Kumiko
Tanaka, Rina
Ito, Yuri
Fukui, Keisuke
Kamo, Ken-ichi
Simulation Models in Gastric Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review
title Simulation Models in Gastric Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review
title_full Simulation Models in Gastric Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Simulation Models in Gastric Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Simulation Models in Gastric Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review
title_short Simulation Models in Gastric Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review
title_sort simulation models in gastric cancer screening: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6428531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30583337
http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2018.19.12.3321
work_keys_str_mv AT matsudaayako simulationmodelsingastriccancerscreeningasystematicreview
AT saikakumiko simulationmodelsingastriccancerscreeningasystematicreview
AT tanakarina simulationmodelsingastriccancerscreeningasystematicreview
AT itoyuri simulationmodelsingastriccancerscreeningasystematicreview
AT fukuikeisuke simulationmodelsingastriccancerscreeningasystematicreview
AT kamokenichi simulationmodelsingastriccancerscreeningasystematicreview