Cargando…
Test-retest reliability of goniometric measurements of the range of dart-throwing motion
[Purpose] To examine the reliability of using a manual goniometer for measuring the range of dart-throwing motion. [Participants and Methods] The range of dart-throwing motion in 24 healthy participants was measured by three raters on the same day, and one rater repeated the measurement on another d...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Society of Physical Therapy Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6428652/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30936638 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.31.236 |
_version_ | 1783405425392091136 |
---|---|
author | Mitsukane, Masahiro Tanabe, Hirohumi Sugama, Kosuke Suzuki, Yusuke Tsurumi, Takahiko |
author_facet | Mitsukane, Masahiro Tanabe, Hirohumi Sugama, Kosuke Suzuki, Yusuke Tsurumi, Takahiko |
author_sort | Mitsukane, Masahiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Purpose] To examine the reliability of using a manual goniometer for measuring the range of dart-throwing motion. [Participants and Methods] The range of dart-throwing motion in 24 healthy participants was measured by three raters on the same day, and one rater repeated the measurement on another day of the same week. The stationary arm of the goniometer was placed along the radius, and the moveable arm was placed along the shaft of the second metacarpal, approximately 45° supinated from Lister’s tubercle. All of the participants performed the dart-throwing motion on a plane that passed through the anatomical neutral wrist position, inclined 45° to the orthogonal anatomical plane. [Results] The intra-rater reliability was moderate (0.5–0.75) only for some parameters of the radial extension, and the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of all other parameters were <0.5. For the inter-rater reliability, the ICCs of all parameters were <0.5. Brand-Altman analysis revealed some fixed biases between the raters, although no proportional bias was observed. [Conclusion] The goniometric measurement procedure examined in this study appeared to be unsuitable for clinical use because of its poor reliability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6428652 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | The Society of Physical Therapy Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64286522019-04-01 Test-retest reliability of goniometric measurements of the range of dart-throwing motion Mitsukane, Masahiro Tanabe, Hirohumi Sugama, Kosuke Suzuki, Yusuke Tsurumi, Takahiko J Phys Ther Sci Original Article [Purpose] To examine the reliability of using a manual goniometer for measuring the range of dart-throwing motion. [Participants and Methods] The range of dart-throwing motion in 24 healthy participants was measured by three raters on the same day, and one rater repeated the measurement on another day of the same week. The stationary arm of the goniometer was placed along the radius, and the moveable arm was placed along the shaft of the second metacarpal, approximately 45° supinated from Lister’s tubercle. All of the participants performed the dart-throwing motion on a plane that passed through the anatomical neutral wrist position, inclined 45° to the orthogonal anatomical plane. [Results] The intra-rater reliability was moderate (0.5–0.75) only for some parameters of the radial extension, and the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of all other parameters were <0.5. For the inter-rater reliability, the ICCs of all parameters were <0.5. Brand-Altman analysis revealed some fixed biases between the raters, although no proportional bias was observed. [Conclusion] The goniometric measurement procedure examined in this study appeared to be unsuitable for clinical use because of its poor reliability. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2019-03-19 2019-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6428652/ /pubmed/30936638 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.31.236 Text en 2019©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mitsukane, Masahiro Tanabe, Hirohumi Sugama, Kosuke Suzuki, Yusuke Tsurumi, Takahiko Test-retest reliability of goniometric measurements of the range of dart-throwing motion |
title | Test-retest reliability of goniometric measurements of the range of
dart-throwing motion |
title_full | Test-retest reliability of goniometric measurements of the range of
dart-throwing motion |
title_fullStr | Test-retest reliability of goniometric measurements of the range of
dart-throwing motion |
title_full_unstemmed | Test-retest reliability of goniometric measurements of the range of
dart-throwing motion |
title_short | Test-retest reliability of goniometric measurements of the range of
dart-throwing motion |
title_sort | test-retest reliability of goniometric measurements of the range of
dart-throwing motion |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6428652/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30936638 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.31.236 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mitsukanemasahiro testretestreliabilityofgoniometricmeasurementsoftherangeofdartthrowingmotion AT tanabehirohumi testretestreliabilityofgoniometricmeasurementsoftherangeofdartthrowingmotion AT sugamakosuke testretestreliabilityofgoniometricmeasurementsoftherangeofdartthrowingmotion AT suzukiyusuke testretestreliabilityofgoniometricmeasurementsoftherangeofdartthrowingmotion AT tsurumitakahiko testretestreliabilityofgoniometricmeasurementsoftherangeofdartthrowingmotion |