Cargando…

Health Promotion at Work: A Comparison of Policy and Practice Across Europe

BACKGROUND: Promoting healthy lifestyles at work should complement workplace safety programs. This study systematically investigates current states of occupational health and safety (OHS) policy as well as practice in the European Union (EU). METHODS: OHS policies of EU member states were categorize...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verra, Sanne E., Benzerga, Amel, Jiao, Boshen, Ruggeri, Kai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6428991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30949377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2018.07.003
_version_ 1783405495202086912
author Verra, Sanne E.
Benzerga, Amel
Jiao, Boshen
Ruggeri, Kai
author_facet Verra, Sanne E.
Benzerga, Amel
Jiao, Boshen
Ruggeri, Kai
author_sort Verra, Sanne E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Promoting healthy lifestyles at work should complement workplace safety programs. This study systematically investigates current states of occupational health and safety (OHS) policy as well as practice in the European Union (EU). METHODS: OHS policies of EU member states were categorized as either prevention or health promotion provisions using a manifest content analysis. Policy rankings were then created for each prevention and promotion. Rankings compared eight indicators from the European Survey of Enterprises on New and Emerging Risks-2 data on prevention and promotion practices for each member state using Chi-square and probit regression analyses. RESULTS: Overall, 73.1% of EU establishments take preventive measures against direct physical harm, and about 35.4% take measures to prevent psychosocial risks. Merely 29.5% have measures to promote health. Weak and inconsistent links between OHS policy and practice indicators were identified. CONCLUSION: National OHS policies evidently concentrate on prevention while compliance with health and safety practices is relatively low. Psychosocial risks are often addressed in national policy but not implemented by institutions. Current risk assessment methods are outdated and often lack psychosocial indicators. Health promotion at work is rare in policy and practice, and its interpretation remains preventive. Member states need to adopt policies that actively improve health and well-being at the workplace.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6428991
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64289912019-04-04 Health Promotion at Work: A Comparison of Policy and Practice Across Europe Verra, Sanne E. Benzerga, Amel Jiao, Boshen Ruggeri, Kai Saf Health Work Original Article BACKGROUND: Promoting healthy lifestyles at work should complement workplace safety programs. This study systematically investigates current states of occupational health and safety (OHS) policy as well as practice in the European Union (EU). METHODS: OHS policies of EU member states were categorized as either prevention or health promotion provisions using a manifest content analysis. Policy rankings were then created for each prevention and promotion. Rankings compared eight indicators from the European Survey of Enterprises on New and Emerging Risks-2 data on prevention and promotion practices for each member state using Chi-square and probit regression analyses. RESULTS: Overall, 73.1% of EU establishments take preventive measures against direct physical harm, and about 35.4% take measures to prevent psychosocial risks. Merely 29.5% have measures to promote health. Weak and inconsistent links between OHS policy and practice indicators were identified. CONCLUSION: National OHS policies evidently concentrate on prevention while compliance with health and safety practices is relatively low. Psychosocial risks are often addressed in national policy but not implemented by institutions. Current risk assessment methods are outdated and often lack psychosocial indicators. Health promotion at work is rare in policy and practice, and its interpretation remains preventive. Member states need to adopt policies that actively improve health and well-being at the workplace. Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute 2019-03 2018-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6428991/ /pubmed/30949377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2018.07.003 Text en © 2019 Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Verra, Sanne E.
Benzerga, Amel
Jiao, Boshen
Ruggeri, Kai
Health Promotion at Work: A Comparison of Policy and Practice Across Europe
title Health Promotion at Work: A Comparison of Policy and Practice Across Europe
title_full Health Promotion at Work: A Comparison of Policy and Practice Across Europe
title_fullStr Health Promotion at Work: A Comparison of Policy and Practice Across Europe
title_full_unstemmed Health Promotion at Work: A Comparison of Policy and Practice Across Europe
title_short Health Promotion at Work: A Comparison of Policy and Practice Across Europe
title_sort health promotion at work: a comparison of policy and practice across europe
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6428991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30949377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2018.07.003
work_keys_str_mv AT verrasannee healthpromotionatworkacomparisonofpolicyandpracticeacrosseurope
AT benzergaamel healthpromotionatworkacomparisonofpolicyandpracticeacrosseurope
AT jiaoboshen healthpromotionatworkacomparisonofpolicyandpracticeacrosseurope
AT ruggerikai healthpromotionatworkacomparisonofpolicyandpracticeacrosseurope