Cargando…
Health Promotion at Work: A Comparison of Policy and Practice Across Europe
BACKGROUND: Promoting healthy lifestyles at work should complement workplace safety programs. This study systematically investigates current states of occupational health and safety (OHS) policy as well as practice in the European Union (EU). METHODS: OHS policies of EU member states were categorize...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6428991/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30949377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2018.07.003 |
_version_ | 1783405495202086912 |
---|---|
author | Verra, Sanne E. Benzerga, Amel Jiao, Boshen Ruggeri, Kai |
author_facet | Verra, Sanne E. Benzerga, Amel Jiao, Boshen Ruggeri, Kai |
author_sort | Verra, Sanne E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Promoting healthy lifestyles at work should complement workplace safety programs. This study systematically investigates current states of occupational health and safety (OHS) policy as well as practice in the European Union (EU). METHODS: OHS policies of EU member states were categorized as either prevention or health promotion provisions using a manifest content analysis. Policy rankings were then created for each prevention and promotion. Rankings compared eight indicators from the European Survey of Enterprises on New and Emerging Risks-2 data on prevention and promotion practices for each member state using Chi-square and probit regression analyses. RESULTS: Overall, 73.1% of EU establishments take preventive measures against direct physical harm, and about 35.4% take measures to prevent psychosocial risks. Merely 29.5% have measures to promote health. Weak and inconsistent links between OHS policy and practice indicators were identified. CONCLUSION: National OHS policies evidently concentrate on prevention while compliance with health and safety practices is relatively low. Psychosocial risks are often addressed in national policy but not implemented by institutions. Current risk assessment methods are outdated and often lack psychosocial indicators. Health promotion at work is rare in policy and practice, and its interpretation remains preventive. Member states need to adopt policies that actively improve health and well-being at the workplace. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6428991 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64289912019-04-04 Health Promotion at Work: A Comparison of Policy and Practice Across Europe Verra, Sanne E. Benzerga, Amel Jiao, Boshen Ruggeri, Kai Saf Health Work Original Article BACKGROUND: Promoting healthy lifestyles at work should complement workplace safety programs. This study systematically investigates current states of occupational health and safety (OHS) policy as well as practice in the European Union (EU). METHODS: OHS policies of EU member states were categorized as either prevention or health promotion provisions using a manifest content analysis. Policy rankings were then created for each prevention and promotion. Rankings compared eight indicators from the European Survey of Enterprises on New and Emerging Risks-2 data on prevention and promotion practices for each member state using Chi-square and probit regression analyses. RESULTS: Overall, 73.1% of EU establishments take preventive measures against direct physical harm, and about 35.4% take measures to prevent psychosocial risks. Merely 29.5% have measures to promote health. Weak and inconsistent links between OHS policy and practice indicators were identified. CONCLUSION: National OHS policies evidently concentrate on prevention while compliance with health and safety practices is relatively low. Psychosocial risks are often addressed in national policy but not implemented by institutions. Current risk assessment methods are outdated and often lack psychosocial indicators. Health promotion at work is rare in policy and practice, and its interpretation remains preventive. Member states need to adopt policies that actively improve health and well-being at the workplace. Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute 2019-03 2018-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6428991/ /pubmed/30949377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2018.07.003 Text en © 2019 Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Verra, Sanne E. Benzerga, Amel Jiao, Boshen Ruggeri, Kai Health Promotion at Work: A Comparison of Policy and Practice Across Europe |
title | Health Promotion at Work: A Comparison of Policy and Practice Across Europe |
title_full | Health Promotion at Work: A Comparison of Policy and Practice Across Europe |
title_fullStr | Health Promotion at Work: A Comparison of Policy and Practice Across Europe |
title_full_unstemmed | Health Promotion at Work: A Comparison of Policy and Practice Across Europe |
title_short | Health Promotion at Work: A Comparison of Policy and Practice Across Europe |
title_sort | health promotion at work: a comparison of policy and practice across europe |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6428991/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30949377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2018.07.003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT verrasannee healthpromotionatworkacomparisonofpolicyandpracticeacrosseurope AT benzergaamel healthpromotionatworkacomparisonofpolicyandpracticeacrosseurope AT jiaoboshen healthpromotionatworkacomparisonofpolicyandpracticeacrosseurope AT ruggerikai healthpromotionatworkacomparisonofpolicyandpracticeacrosseurope |