Cargando…

Refining the Phenotype of Recurrent Rearrangements of Chromosome 16

Chromosome 16 is one of the most gene-rich chromosomes of our genome, and 10% of its sequence consists of segmental duplications, which give instability and predisposition to rearrangement by the recurrent mechanism of non-allelic homologous recombination. Microarray technologies have allowed for th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Redaelli, Serena, Maitz, Silvia, Crosti, Francesca, Sala, Elena, Villa, Nicoletta, Spaccini, Luigina, Selicorni, Angelo, Rigoldi, Miriam, Conconi, Donatella, Dalprà, Leda, Roversi, Gaia, Bentivegna, Angela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6429492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30836598
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms20051095
_version_ 1783405608032010240
author Redaelli, Serena
Maitz, Silvia
Crosti, Francesca
Sala, Elena
Villa, Nicoletta
Spaccini, Luigina
Selicorni, Angelo
Rigoldi, Miriam
Conconi, Donatella
Dalprà, Leda
Roversi, Gaia
Bentivegna, Angela
author_facet Redaelli, Serena
Maitz, Silvia
Crosti, Francesca
Sala, Elena
Villa, Nicoletta
Spaccini, Luigina
Selicorni, Angelo
Rigoldi, Miriam
Conconi, Donatella
Dalprà, Leda
Roversi, Gaia
Bentivegna, Angela
author_sort Redaelli, Serena
collection PubMed
description Chromosome 16 is one of the most gene-rich chromosomes of our genome, and 10% of its sequence consists of segmental duplications, which give instability and predisposition to rearrangement by the recurrent mechanism of non-allelic homologous recombination. Microarray technologies have allowed for the analysis of copy number variations (CNVs) that can contribute to the risk of developing complex diseases. By array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) screening of 1476 patients, we detected 27 cases with CNVs on chromosome 16. We identified four smallest regions of overlapping (SROs): one at 16p13.11 was found in seven patients; one at 16p12.2 was found in four patients; two close SROs at 16p11.2 were found in twelve patients; finally, six patients were found with atypical rearrangements. Although phenotypic variability was observed, we identified a male bias for Childhood Apraxia of Speech associated to 16p11.2 microdeletions. We also reported an elevated frequency of second-site genomic alterations, supporting the model of the second hit to explain the clinical variability associated with CNV syndromes. Our goal was to contribute to the building of a chromosome 16 disease-map based on disease susceptibility regions. The role of the CNVs of chromosome 16 was increasingly made clear in the determination of developmental delay. We also found that in some cases a second-site CNV could explain the phenotypic heterogeneity by a simple additive effect or a pejorative synergistic effect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6429492
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64294922019-04-10 Refining the Phenotype of Recurrent Rearrangements of Chromosome 16 Redaelli, Serena Maitz, Silvia Crosti, Francesca Sala, Elena Villa, Nicoletta Spaccini, Luigina Selicorni, Angelo Rigoldi, Miriam Conconi, Donatella Dalprà, Leda Roversi, Gaia Bentivegna, Angela Int J Mol Sci Article Chromosome 16 is one of the most gene-rich chromosomes of our genome, and 10% of its sequence consists of segmental duplications, which give instability and predisposition to rearrangement by the recurrent mechanism of non-allelic homologous recombination. Microarray technologies have allowed for the analysis of copy number variations (CNVs) that can contribute to the risk of developing complex diseases. By array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) screening of 1476 patients, we detected 27 cases with CNVs on chromosome 16. We identified four smallest regions of overlapping (SROs): one at 16p13.11 was found in seven patients; one at 16p12.2 was found in four patients; two close SROs at 16p11.2 were found in twelve patients; finally, six patients were found with atypical rearrangements. Although phenotypic variability was observed, we identified a male bias for Childhood Apraxia of Speech associated to 16p11.2 microdeletions. We also reported an elevated frequency of second-site genomic alterations, supporting the model of the second hit to explain the clinical variability associated with CNV syndromes. Our goal was to contribute to the building of a chromosome 16 disease-map based on disease susceptibility regions. The role of the CNVs of chromosome 16 was increasingly made clear in the determination of developmental delay. We also found that in some cases a second-site CNV could explain the phenotypic heterogeneity by a simple additive effect or a pejorative synergistic effect. MDPI 2019-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6429492/ /pubmed/30836598 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms20051095 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Redaelli, Serena
Maitz, Silvia
Crosti, Francesca
Sala, Elena
Villa, Nicoletta
Spaccini, Luigina
Selicorni, Angelo
Rigoldi, Miriam
Conconi, Donatella
Dalprà, Leda
Roversi, Gaia
Bentivegna, Angela
Refining the Phenotype of Recurrent Rearrangements of Chromosome 16
title Refining the Phenotype of Recurrent Rearrangements of Chromosome 16
title_full Refining the Phenotype of Recurrent Rearrangements of Chromosome 16
title_fullStr Refining the Phenotype of Recurrent Rearrangements of Chromosome 16
title_full_unstemmed Refining the Phenotype of Recurrent Rearrangements of Chromosome 16
title_short Refining the Phenotype of Recurrent Rearrangements of Chromosome 16
title_sort refining the phenotype of recurrent rearrangements of chromosome 16
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6429492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30836598
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms20051095
work_keys_str_mv AT redaelliserena refiningthephenotypeofrecurrentrearrangementsofchromosome16
AT maitzsilvia refiningthephenotypeofrecurrentrearrangementsofchromosome16
AT crostifrancesca refiningthephenotypeofrecurrentrearrangementsofchromosome16
AT salaelena refiningthephenotypeofrecurrentrearrangementsofchromosome16
AT villanicoletta refiningthephenotypeofrecurrentrearrangementsofchromosome16
AT spacciniluigina refiningthephenotypeofrecurrentrearrangementsofchromosome16
AT selicorniangelo refiningthephenotypeofrecurrentrearrangementsofchromosome16
AT rigoldimiriam refiningthephenotypeofrecurrentrearrangementsofchromosome16
AT conconidonatella refiningthephenotypeofrecurrentrearrangementsofchromosome16
AT dalpraleda refiningthephenotypeofrecurrentrearrangementsofchromosome16
AT roversigaia refiningthephenotypeofrecurrentrearrangementsofchromosome16
AT bentivegnaangela refiningthephenotypeofrecurrentrearrangementsofchromosome16