Cargando…
Dietary Fiber from Chickpea (Cicer arietinum) and Soybean (Glycine max) Husk Byproducts as Baking Additives: Functional and Nutritional Properties
Dietary fiber extracted from soybean and chickpea husks was used in the formulation of white bread. Treatments at different concentrations of dietary fiber (DF): bread + 0.15%, 0.3%, 1.5%, 2% soybean dietary fiber (SDF); bread + 0.15%, 0.3%, 1.5%, 2% chickpea dietary fiber (CDF), and a control treat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6429506/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30870973 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules24050991 |
_version_ | 1783405611308810240 |
---|---|
author | Niño-Medina, Guillermo Muy-Rangel, Dolores de la Garza, Ana Laura Rubio-Carrasco, Werner Pérez-Meza, Briceida Araujo-Chapa, Ana P. Gutiérrez-Álvarez, Kelsy A. Urías-Orona, Vania |
author_facet | Niño-Medina, Guillermo Muy-Rangel, Dolores de la Garza, Ana Laura Rubio-Carrasco, Werner Pérez-Meza, Briceida Araujo-Chapa, Ana P. Gutiérrez-Álvarez, Kelsy A. Urías-Orona, Vania |
author_sort | Niño-Medina, Guillermo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Dietary fiber extracted from soybean and chickpea husks was used in the formulation of white bread. Treatments at different concentrations of dietary fiber (DF): bread + 0.15%, 0.3%, 1.5%, 2% soybean dietary fiber (SDF); bread + 0.15%, 0.3%, 1.5%, 2% chickpea dietary fiber (CDF), and a control treatment (Bread 0% DF) were used initially. However, the treatments that showed the greatest improvement effects were: bread + 2% SDF and bread + 2% CDF. The functionality and the nutritional contribution in the treatments were evaluated during four days of storage. The weight loss on the third day of storage was 30% higher in the control treatment than the products with 2% SDF and 2% CDF, while for the evaluation of firmness, the control obtained a hardness of 86 N, and treatments with 2% SDF and 2% CDF 60 N and 45 N, respectively. The presence of phenolic compounds and their antioxidant activity was evident, mainly in the 2% SDF treatment, which had a total phenolic content of 1036, while in the Bread 0% DF it was 232 mgEAC/kg. The antioxidant activity for 2% SDF by DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl), ABTS (3-ethyl-benzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid), and FRAP (ferric reducing antioxidant power) was 1096, 2567, and 1800 µmolTE/kg, respectively. Dietary fiber addition favored the reduction of weight loss and firmness of white bread during storage. In addition, color was not affected and the content calcium, phenolics, as well as antioxidant capacity were slightly improved. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6429506 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64295062019-04-15 Dietary Fiber from Chickpea (Cicer arietinum) and Soybean (Glycine max) Husk Byproducts as Baking Additives: Functional and Nutritional Properties Niño-Medina, Guillermo Muy-Rangel, Dolores de la Garza, Ana Laura Rubio-Carrasco, Werner Pérez-Meza, Briceida Araujo-Chapa, Ana P. Gutiérrez-Álvarez, Kelsy A. Urías-Orona, Vania Molecules Article Dietary fiber extracted from soybean and chickpea husks was used in the formulation of white bread. Treatments at different concentrations of dietary fiber (DF): bread + 0.15%, 0.3%, 1.5%, 2% soybean dietary fiber (SDF); bread + 0.15%, 0.3%, 1.5%, 2% chickpea dietary fiber (CDF), and a control treatment (Bread 0% DF) were used initially. However, the treatments that showed the greatest improvement effects were: bread + 2% SDF and bread + 2% CDF. The functionality and the nutritional contribution in the treatments were evaluated during four days of storage. The weight loss on the third day of storage was 30% higher in the control treatment than the products with 2% SDF and 2% CDF, while for the evaluation of firmness, the control obtained a hardness of 86 N, and treatments with 2% SDF and 2% CDF 60 N and 45 N, respectively. The presence of phenolic compounds and their antioxidant activity was evident, mainly in the 2% SDF treatment, which had a total phenolic content of 1036, while in the Bread 0% DF it was 232 mgEAC/kg. The antioxidant activity for 2% SDF by DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl), ABTS (3-ethyl-benzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid), and FRAP (ferric reducing antioxidant power) was 1096, 2567, and 1800 µmolTE/kg, respectively. Dietary fiber addition favored the reduction of weight loss and firmness of white bread during storage. In addition, color was not affected and the content calcium, phenolics, as well as antioxidant capacity were slightly improved. MDPI 2019-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6429506/ /pubmed/30870973 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules24050991 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Niño-Medina, Guillermo Muy-Rangel, Dolores de la Garza, Ana Laura Rubio-Carrasco, Werner Pérez-Meza, Briceida Araujo-Chapa, Ana P. Gutiérrez-Álvarez, Kelsy A. Urías-Orona, Vania Dietary Fiber from Chickpea (Cicer arietinum) and Soybean (Glycine max) Husk Byproducts as Baking Additives: Functional and Nutritional Properties |
title | Dietary Fiber from Chickpea (Cicer arietinum) and Soybean (Glycine max) Husk Byproducts as Baking Additives: Functional and Nutritional Properties |
title_full | Dietary Fiber from Chickpea (Cicer arietinum) and Soybean (Glycine max) Husk Byproducts as Baking Additives: Functional and Nutritional Properties |
title_fullStr | Dietary Fiber from Chickpea (Cicer arietinum) and Soybean (Glycine max) Husk Byproducts as Baking Additives: Functional and Nutritional Properties |
title_full_unstemmed | Dietary Fiber from Chickpea (Cicer arietinum) and Soybean (Glycine max) Husk Byproducts as Baking Additives: Functional and Nutritional Properties |
title_short | Dietary Fiber from Chickpea (Cicer arietinum) and Soybean (Glycine max) Husk Byproducts as Baking Additives: Functional and Nutritional Properties |
title_sort | dietary fiber from chickpea (cicer arietinum) and soybean (glycine max) husk byproducts as baking additives: functional and nutritional properties |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6429506/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30870973 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules24050991 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ninomedinaguillermo dietaryfiberfromchickpeacicerarietinumandsoybeanglycinemaxhuskbyproductsasbakingadditivesfunctionalandnutritionalproperties AT muyrangeldolores dietaryfiberfromchickpeacicerarietinumandsoybeanglycinemaxhuskbyproductsasbakingadditivesfunctionalandnutritionalproperties AT delagarzaanalaura dietaryfiberfromchickpeacicerarietinumandsoybeanglycinemaxhuskbyproductsasbakingadditivesfunctionalandnutritionalproperties AT rubiocarrascowerner dietaryfiberfromchickpeacicerarietinumandsoybeanglycinemaxhuskbyproductsasbakingadditivesfunctionalandnutritionalproperties AT perezmezabriceida dietaryfiberfromchickpeacicerarietinumandsoybeanglycinemaxhuskbyproductsasbakingadditivesfunctionalandnutritionalproperties AT araujochapaanap dietaryfiberfromchickpeacicerarietinumandsoybeanglycinemaxhuskbyproductsasbakingadditivesfunctionalandnutritionalproperties AT gutierrezalvarezkelsya dietaryfiberfromchickpeacicerarietinumandsoybeanglycinemaxhuskbyproductsasbakingadditivesfunctionalandnutritionalproperties AT uriasoronavania dietaryfiberfromchickpeacicerarietinumandsoybeanglycinemaxhuskbyproductsasbakingadditivesfunctionalandnutritionalproperties |