Cargando…

Computed Tomography Assessment of Anatomic Graft Placement After ACL Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of Grid and Angle Measurements

BACKGROUND: The anatomic placement of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) grafts is often assessed with postoperative imaging. In clinical practice, graft angles are measured to indicate anatomic placement on magnetic resonance imaging, whereas grid measurements are performed on computed tomography (CT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parkar, Anagha P., Adriaensen, Miraude E.A.P.M., Giil, Lasse M., Solheim, Eirik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6429657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30915380
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967119832594
_version_ 1783405638194298880
author Parkar, Anagha P.
Adriaensen, Miraude E.A.P.M.
Giil, Lasse M.
Solheim, Eirik
author_facet Parkar, Anagha P.
Adriaensen, Miraude E.A.P.M.
Giil, Lasse M.
Solheim, Eirik
author_sort Parkar, Anagha P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The anatomic placement of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) grafts is often assessed with postoperative imaging. In clinical practice, graft angles are measured to indicate anatomic placement on magnetic resonance imaging, whereas grid measurements are performed on computed tomography (CT). Recently, a study indicated that graft angle measurements could also be assessed on CT. No consensus has yet been reached on which measurement method is best suited to assess anatomic graft placement. PURPOSE: To compare the ability of grid measurements and angle measurements to identify anatomic versus nonanatomic tunnel placement on CT performed in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A total of 100 knees undergoing primary reconstruction with a hamstring graft (HAM group), 91 undergoing reconstruction with a bone–patellar tendon–bone graft (BPTB group), and 117 undergoing revision ACL reconstruction (REV group) were assessed with CT. Grid measurements of the femoral and tibial tunnels and angle measurements of grafts were performed. Graft placement, rated as anatomic or nonanatomic, was assessed with both methods. Pearson chi-square, analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis, and weighted kappa tests were performed as appropriate. RESULTS: The grid assessment classified 10% of the HAM group, 4% of the BPTB group, and 17% of the REV group as nonanatomic (P < .001). The angle assessment classified 37% of the HAM group, 54% of the BPTB group, and 47% of the REV group as nonanatomic. The weighted kappa between angle measurements and grid measurements was low in all groups (HAM: 0.009; BPTB: 0.065; REV: 0.041). CONCLUSION: The agreement between grid measurements and angle measurements was very low. The angle measurements seemed to overestimate nonanatomic tunnel placement. Grid measurements were better in identifying malpositioned grafts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6429657
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64296572019-03-26 Computed Tomography Assessment of Anatomic Graft Placement After ACL Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of Grid and Angle Measurements Parkar, Anagha P. Adriaensen, Miraude E.A.P.M. Giil, Lasse M. Solheim, Eirik Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: The anatomic placement of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) grafts is often assessed with postoperative imaging. In clinical practice, graft angles are measured to indicate anatomic placement on magnetic resonance imaging, whereas grid measurements are performed on computed tomography (CT). Recently, a study indicated that graft angle measurements could also be assessed on CT. No consensus has yet been reached on which measurement method is best suited to assess anatomic graft placement. PURPOSE: To compare the ability of grid measurements and angle measurements to identify anatomic versus nonanatomic tunnel placement on CT performed in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A total of 100 knees undergoing primary reconstruction with a hamstring graft (HAM group), 91 undergoing reconstruction with a bone–patellar tendon–bone graft (BPTB group), and 117 undergoing revision ACL reconstruction (REV group) were assessed with CT. Grid measurements of the femoral and tibial tunnels and angle measurements of grafts were performed. Graft placement, rated as anatomic or nonanatomic, was assessed with both methods. Pearson chi-square, analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis, and weighted kappa tests were performed as appropriate. RESULTS: The grid assessment classified 10% of the HAM group, 4% of the BPTB group, and 17% of the REV group as nonanatomic (P < .001). The angle assessment classified 37% of the HAM group, 54% of the BPTB group, and 47% of the REV group as nonanatomic. The weighted kappa between angle measurements and grid measurements was low in all groups (HAM: 0.009; BPTB: 0.065; REV: 0.041). CONCLUSION: The agreement between grid measurements and angle measurements was very low. The angle measurements seemed to overestimate nonanatomic tunnel placement. Grid measurements were better in identifying malpositioned grafts. SAGE Publications 2019-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6429657/ /pubmed/30915380 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967119832594 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Parkar, Anagha P.
Adriaensen, Miraude E.A.P.M.
Giil, Lasse M.
Solheim, Eirik
Computed Tomography Assessment of Anatomic Graft Placement After ACL Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of Grid and Angle Measurements
title Computed Tomography Assessment of Anatomic Graft Placement After ACL Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of Grid and Angle Measurements
title_full Computed Tomography Assessment of Anatomic Graft Placement After ACL Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of Grid and Angle Measurements
title_fullStr Computed Tomography Assessment of Anatomic Graft Placement After ACL Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of Grid and Angle Measurements
title_full_unstemmed Computed Tomography Assessment of Anatomic Graft Placement After ACL Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of Grid and Angle Measurements
title_short Computed Tomography Assessment of Anatomic Graft Placement After ACL Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of Grid and Angle Measurements
title_sort computed tomography assessment of anatomic graft placement after acl reconstruction: a comparative study of grid and angle measurements
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6429657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30915380
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967119832594
work_keys_str_mv AT parkaranaghap computedtomographyassessmentofanatomicgraftplacementafteraclreconstructionacomparativestudyofgridandanglemeasurements
AT adriaensenmiraudeeapm computedtomographyassessmentofanatomicgraftplacementafteraclreconstructionacomparativestudyofgridandanglemeasurements
AT giillassem computedtomographyassessmentofanatomicgraftplacementafteraclreconstructionacomparativestudyofgridandanglemeasurements
AT solheimeirik computedtomographyassessmentofanatomicgraftplacementafteraclreconstructionacomparativestudyofgridandanglemeasurements