Cargando…
Association between anxiety, depression and quality of life: study protocol for a systematic review of evidence from longitudinal studies
INTRODUCTION: Evidence from individual longitudinal studies suggests that anxiety and depression may impact quality of life. However, systematic reviews synthesising current evidence have mainly focused on specific samples. Thus, the aim of this study is to synthesise evidence from longitudinal stud...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6429835/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30837260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027218 |
_version_ | 1783405675372609536 |
---|---|
author | Hohls, Johanna Katharina König, Hans-Helmut Quirke, Eleanor Hajek, André |
author_facet | Hohls, Johanna Katharina König, Hans-Helmut Quirke, Eleanor Hajek, André |
author_sort | Hohls, Johanna Katharina |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Evidence from individual longitudinal studies suggests that anxiety and depression may impact quality of life. However, systematic reviews synthesising current evidence have mainly focused on specific samples. Thus, the aim of this study is to synthesise evidence from longitudinal studies on the association between anxiety, depression and quality of life in a systematic review. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic review of evidence from longitudinal studies analysing the association between anxiety, depression and quality of life will be conducted, taking into account the current Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Several electronic databases from relevant fields of research (PubMed, PsycINFO, PSYNDEX, EconLit, NHS EED) will be searched in September 2018 using defined search terms, with an updated search planned. Moreover, reference lists of included studies will be searched manually. Study eligibility will be appraised in a two-step process against pre-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Primarily, information on study design and assessment, statistical methods, participant characteristics as well as results regarding our research question will be extracted. The quality of included studies will be assessed using an appropriate tool. Study selection, data extraction and assessment of study quality will be performed by two reviewers. Disagreements will be resolved through discussion or by inclusion of a third party. Results will be synthesised narratively in text and tables. Depending on the number and heterogeneity of the studies included, a meta-analysis will be performed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As no primary data will be collected, approval from an ethics committee is not required. Results will be disseminated through conference presentations and publication in a peer-reviewed, scientific journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018108008. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6429835 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64298352019-04-05 Association between anxiety, depression and quality of life: study protocol for a systematic review of evidence from longitudinal studies Hohls, Johanna Katharina König, Hans-Helmut Quirke, Eleanor Hajek, André BMJ Open Mental Health INTRODUCTION: Evidence from individual longitudinal studies suggests that anxiety and depression may impact quality of life. However, systematic reviews synthesising current evidence have mainly focused on specific samples. Thus, the aim of this study is to synthesise evidence from longitudinal studies on the association between anxiety, depression and quality of life in a systematic review. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic review of evidence from longitudinal studies analysing the association between anxiety, depression and quality of life will be conducted, taking into account the current Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Several electronic databases from relevant fields of research (PubMed, PsycINFO, PSYNDEX, EconLit, NHS EED) will be searched in September 2018 using defined search terms, with an updated search planned. Moreover, reference lists of included studies will be searched manually. Study eligibility will be appraised in a two-step process against pre-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Primarily, information on study design and assessment, statistical methods, participant characteristics as well as results regarding our research question will be extracted. The quality of included studies will be assessed using an appropriate tool. Study selection, data extraction and assessment of study quality will be performed by two reviewers. Disagreements will be resolved through discussion or by inclusion of a third party. Results will be synthesised narratively in text and tables. Depending on the number and heterogeneity of the studies included, a meta-analysis will be performed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As no primary data will be collected, approval from an ethics committee is not required. Results will be disseminated through conference presentations and publication in a peer-reviewed, scientific journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018108008. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6429835/ /pubmed/30837260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027218 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Mental Health Hohls, Johanna Katharina König, Hans-Helmut Quirke, Eleanor Hajek, André Association between anxiety, depression and quality of life: study protocol for a systematic review of evidence from longitudinal studies |
title | Association between anxiety, depression and quality of life: study protocol for a systematic review of evidence from longitudinal studies |
title_full | Association between anxiety, depression and quality of life: study protocol for a systematic review of evidence from longitudinal studies |
title_fullStr | Association between anxiety, depression and quality of life: study protocol for a systematic review of evidence from longitudinal studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Association between anxiety, depression and quality of life: study protocol for a systematic review of evidence from longitudinal studies |
title_short | Association between anxiety, depression and quality of life: study protocol for a systematic review of evidence from longitudinal studies |
title_sort | association between anxiety, depression and quality of life: study protocol for a systematic review of evidence from longitudinal studies |
topic | Mental Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6429835/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30837260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027218 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hohlsjohannakatharina associationbetweenanxietydepressionandqualityoflifestudyprotocolforasystematicreviewofevidencefromlongitudinalstudies AT konighanshelmut associationbetweenanxietydepressionandqualityoflifestudyprotocolforasystematicreviewofevidencefromlongitudinalstudies AT quirkeeleanor associationbetweenanxietydepressionandqualityoflifestudyprotocolforasystematicreviewofevidencefromlongitudinalstudies AT hajekandre associationbetweenanxietydepressionandqualityoflifestudyprotocolforasystematicreviewofevidencefromlongitudinalstudies |