Cargando…

Association between anxiety, depression and quality of life: study protocol for a systematic review of evidence from longitudinal studies

INTRODUCTION: Evidence from individual longitudinal studies suggests that anxiety and depression may impact quality of life. However, systematic reviews synthesising current evidence have mainly focused on specific samples. Thus, the aim of this study is to synthesise evidence from longitudinal stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hohls, Johanna Katharina, König, Hans-Helmut, Quirke, Eleanor, Hajek, André
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6429835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30837260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027218
_version_ 1783405675372609536
author Hohls, Johanna Katharina
König, Hans-Helmut
Quirke, Eleanor
Hajek, André
author_facet Hohls, Johanna Katharina
König, Hans-Helmut
Quirke, Eleanor
Hajek, André
author_sort Hohls, Johanna Katharina
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Evidence from individual longitudinal studies suggests that anxiety and depression may impact quality of life. However, systematic reviews synthesising current evidence have mainly focused on specific samples. Thus, the aim of this study is to synthesise evidence from longitudinal studies on the association between anxiety, depression and quality of life in a systematic review. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic review of evidence from longitudinal studies analysing the association between anxiety, depression and quality of life will be conducted, taking into account the current Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Several electronic databases from relevant fields of research (PubMed, PsycINFO, PSYNDEX, EconLit, NHS EED) will be searched in September 2018 using defined search terms, with an updated search planned. Moreover, reference lists of included studies will be searched manually. Study eligibility will be appraised in a two-step process against pre-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Primarily, information on study design and assessment, statistical methods, participant characteristics as well as results regarding our research question will be extracted. The quality of included studies will be assessed using an appropriate tool. Study selection, data extraction and assessment of study quality will be performed by two reviewers. Disagreements will be resolved through discussion or by inclusion of a third party. Results will be synthesised narratively in text and tables. Depending on the number and heterogeneity of the studies included, a meta-analysis will be performed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As no primary data will be collected, approval from an ethics committee is not required. Results will be disseminated through conference presentations and publication in a peer-reviewed, scientific journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018108008.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6429835
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64298352019-04-05 Association between anxiety, depression and quality of life: study protocol for a systematic review of evidence from longitudinal studies Hohls, Johanna Katharina König, Hans-Helmut Quirke, Eleanor Hajek, André BMJ Open Mental Health INTRODUCTION: Evidence from individual longitudinal studies suggests that anxiety and depression may impact quality of life. However, systematic reviews synthesising current evidence have mainly focused on specific samples. Thus, the aim of this study is to synthesise evidence from longitudinal studies on the association between anxiety, depression and quality of life in a systematic review. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic review of evidence from longitudinal studies analysing the association between anxiety, depression and quality of life will be conducted, taking into account the current Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Several electronic databases from relevant fields of research (PubMed, PsycINFO, PSYNDEX, EconLit, NHS EED) will be searched in September 2018 using defined search terms, with an updated search planned. Moreover, reference lists of included studies will be searched manually. Study eligibility will be appraised in a two-step process against pre-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Primarily, information on study design and assessment, statistical methods, participant characteristics as well as results regarding our research question will be extracted. The quality of included studies will be assessed using an appropriate tool. Study selection, data extraction and assessment of study quality will be performed by two reviewers. Disagreements will be resolved through discussion or by inclusion of a third party. Results will be synthesised narratively in text and tables. Depending on the number and heterogeneity of the studies included, a meta-analysis will be performed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As no primary data will be collected, approval from an ethics committee is not required. Results will be disseminated through conference presentations and publication in a peer-reviewed, scientific journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018108008. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6429835/ /pubmed/30837260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027218 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Mental Health
Hohls, Johanna Katharina
König, Hans-Helmut
Quirke, Eleanor
Hajek, André
Association between anxiety, depression and quality of life: study protocol for a systematic review of evidence from longitudinal studies
title Association between anxiety, depression and quality of life: study protocol for a systematic review of evidence from longitudinal studies
title_full Association between anxiety, depression and quality of life: study protocol for a systematic review of evidence from longitudinal studies
title_fullStr Association between anxiety, depression and quality of life: study protocol for a systematic review of evidence from longitudinal studies
title_full_unstemmed Association between anxiety, depression and quality of life: study protocol for a systematic review of evidence from longitudinal studies
title_short Association between anxiety, depression and quality of life: study protocol for a systematic review of evidence from longitudinal studies
title_sort association between anxiety, depression and quality of life: study protocol for a systematic review of evidence from longitudinal studies
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6429835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30837260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027218
work_keys_str_mv AT hohlsjohannakatharina associationbetweenanxietydepressionandqualityoflifestudyprotocolforasystematicreviewofevidencefromlongitudinalstudies
AT konighanshelmut associationbetweenanxietydepressionandqualityoflifestudyprotocolforasystematicreviewofevidencefromlongitudinalstudies
AT quirkeeleanor associationbetweenanxietydepressionandqualityoflifestudyprotocolforasystematicreviewofevidencefromlongitudinalstudies
AT hajekandre associationbetweenanxietydepressionandqualityoflifestudyprotocolforasystematicreviewofevidencefromlongitudinalstudies