Cargando…

Dislocated distal radial fractures in adult patients: 4 weeks versus 6 weeks of cast immobilisation following reduction, a multicentre randomised controlled trial, study protocol

INTRODUCTION: Up to 30% of patients with a dislocated distal radial fracture (DRF) treated with closed reduction and cast immobilisation suffer from long-term functional restrictions. It remains unclear, whether duration of cast immobilisation influences functional outcome. The aim of this study is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Delft, Eva A K, Bloemers, Frank W, Sosef, Nico L, Bonjer, H J, Schep, Niels W L, Vermeulen, Jefrey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6429892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30878990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026540
_version_ 1783405688926502912
author van Delft, Eva A K
Bloemers, Frank W
Sosef, Nico L
Bonjer, H J
Schep, Niels W L
Vermeulen, Jefrey
author_facet van Delft, Eva A K
Bloemers, Frank W
Sosef, Nico L
Bonjer, H J
Schep, Niels W L
Vermeulen, Jefrey
author_sort van Delft, Eva A K
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Up to 30% of patients with a dislocated distal radial fracture (DRF) treated with closed reduction and cast immobilisation suffer from long-term functional restrictions. It remains unclear, whether duration of cast immobilisation influences functional outcome. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the functional outcome of dislocated DRFs could be improved by shortening the period of immobilisation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A single blinded multicentre randomised controlled trial is initiated. Four weeks of plaster cast immobilisation is compared with six week plaster cast immobilisation in adult patients with adequate reduced DRFs. Primary outcome parameters are functional outcome measured with the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation after 1 year of follow-up (FU). Secondary outcomes are: Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score after 1 year, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey after 1 year, functional outcome earlier in FU (6 weeks, 12 weeks and 6 months), range of motion, pain level and complications: number of re-interventions, secondary dislocation, delayed and non-union. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The medical ethical committee VUmc approved the study protocol (2018.004, NL62861.029.17). The expectation of this study is that a shorter duration of plaster cast immobilisation is beneficial. This risk of specific complications is low and generally similar in both treatment options. FU is standardised according to current trauma guidelines. Present literature indicates that both treatment options that are used within this study are accepted protocols for treatment of dislocated DRFs. This trial will provide Level-I evidence for the comparison of functional outcome between the two treatment options for dislocated DRFs. Results of this study are expected to be published as a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial article in 2021. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Netherlands National Trial Register: NTR 6600, ABR: NL62861.029.17. Medical Ethical Committee VUmc registration number: 2018.004.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6429892
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64298922019-04-05 Dislocated distal radial fractures in adult patients: 4 weeks versus 6 weeks of cast immobilisation following reduction, a multicentre randomised controlled trial, study protocol van Delft, Eva A K Bloemers, Frank W Sosef, Nico L Bonjer, H J Schep, Niels W L Vermeulen, Jefrey BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: Up to 30% of patients with a dislocated distal radial fracture (DRF) treated with closed reduction and cast immobilisation suffer from long-term functional restrictions. It remains unclear, whether duration of cast immobilisation influences functional outcome. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the functional outcome of dislocated DRFs could be improved by shortening the period of immobilisation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A single blinded multicentre randomised controlled trial is initiated. Four weeks of plaster cast immobilisation is compared with six week plaster cast immobilisation in adult patients with adequate reduced DRFs. Primary outcome parameters are functional outcome measured with the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation after 1 year of follow-up (FU). Secondary outcomes are: Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score after 1 year, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey after 1 year, functional outcome earlier in FU (6 weeks, 12 weeks and 6 months), range of motion, pain level and complications: number of re-interventions, secondary dislocation, delayed and non-union. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The medical ethical committee VUmc approved the study protocol (2018.004, NL62861.029.17). The expectation of this study is that a shorter duration of plaster cast immobilisation is beneficial. This risk of specific complications is low and generally similar in both treatment options. FU is standardised according to current trauma guidelines. Present literature indicates that both treatment options that are used within this study are accepted protocols for treatment of dislocated DRFs. This trial will provide Level-I evidence for the comparison of functional outcome between the two treatment options for dislocated DRFs. Results of this study are expected to be published as a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial article in 2021. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Netherlands National Trial Register: NTR 6600, ABR: NL62861.029.17. Medical Ethical Committee VUmc registration number: 2018.004. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6429892/ /pubmed/30878990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026540 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Surgery
van Delft, Eva A K
Bloemers, Frank W
Sosef, Nico L
Bonjer, H J
Schep, Niels W L
Vermeulen, Jefrey
Dislocated distal radial fractures in adult patients: 4 weeks versus 6 weeks of cast immobilisation following reduction, a multicentre randomised controlled trial, study protocol
title Dislocated distal radial fractures in adult patients: 4 weeks versus 6 weeks of cast immobilisation following reduction, a multicentre randomised controlled trial, study protocol
title_full Dislocated distal radial fractures in adult patients: 4 weeks versus 6 weeks of cast immobilisation following reduction, a multicentre randomised controlled trial, study protocol
title_fullStr Dislocated distal radial fractures in adult patients: 4 weeks versus 6 weeks of cast immobilisation following reduction, a multicentre randomised controlled trial, study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Dislocated distal radial fractures in adult patients: 4 weeks versus 6 weeks of cast immobilisation following reduction, a multicentre randomised controlled trial, study protocol
title_short Dislocated distal radial fractures in adult patients: 4 weeks versus 6 weeks of cast immobilisation following reduction, a multicentre randomised controlled trial, study protocol
title_sort dislocated distal radial fractures in adult patients: 4 weeks versus 6 weeks of cast immobilisation following reduction, a multicentre randomised controlled trial, study protocol
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6429892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30878990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026540
work_keys_str_mv AT vandelftevaak dislocateddistalradialfracturesinadultpatients4weeksversus6weeksofcastimmobilisationfollowingreductionamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialstudyprotocol
AT bloemersfrankw dislocateddistalradialfracturesinadultpatients4weeksversus6weeksofcastimmobilisationfollowingreductionamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialstudyprotocol
AT sosefnicol dislocateddistalradialfracturesinadultpatients4weeksversus6weeksofcastimmobilisationfollowingreductionamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialstudyprotocol
AT bonjerhj dislocateddistalradialfracturesinadultpatients4weeksversus6weeksofcastimmobilisationfollowingreductionamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialstudyprotocol
AT schepnielswl dislocateddistalradialfracturesinadultpatients4weeksversus6weeksofcastimmobilisationfollowingreductionamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialstudyprotocol
AT vermeulenjefrey dislocateddistalradialfracturesinadultpatients4weeksversus6weeksofcastimmobilisationfollowingreductionamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialstudyprotocol