Cargando…
Targeted therapies for previously treated advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: systematic review and network meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of treatments for advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (amRCC) after treatment with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted treatment. DESIGN: Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and c...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6429896/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30826762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024691 |
_version_ | 1783405689885949952 |
---|---|
author | Karner, Charlotta Kew, Kayleigh Wakefield, Victoria Masento, Natalie Edwards, Steven J |
author_facet | Karner, Charlotta Kew, Kayleigh Wakefield, Victoria Masento, Natalie Edwards, Steven J |
author_sort | Karner, Charlotta |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of treatments for advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (amRCC) after treatment with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted treatment. DESIGN: Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative observational studies. MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched up to January 2018. PARTICIPANTS: People with amRCC requiring treatment after VEGF-targeted treatment. INTERVENTIONS: Axitinib, cabozantinib, everolimus, lenvatinib with everolimus, nivolumab, sorafenib and best supportive care (BSC). OUTCOMES: Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS); secondary outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), adverse events, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). RESULTS: Twelve studies were included (n=5144): five RCTs and seven observational studies. Lenvatinib with everolimus significantly increased OS and PFS over everolimus (HR 0.61, 95% Credible Interval [95%CrI]: 0.36 to 0.96 and 0.47, 95%CrI: 0.26 to 0.77, respectively) as did cabozantinib (HR 0.66, 95%CrI: 0.53 to 0.82 and 0.51, 95%CrI: 0.41 to 0.63, respectively). This remained the case when observational evidence was included. Nivolumab also significantly improved OS versus everolimus (HR 0.74, 95%CrI: 0.57 to 0.93). OS sensitivity analysis, including observational studies, indicates everolimus being more effective than axitinib and sorafenib. However, inconsistency was identified in the OS sensitivity analysis. PFS sensitivity analysis suggests axitinib is more effective than everolimus, which may be more effective than sorafenib. The results for ORR supported the OS and PFS analyses. Nivolumab is associated with fewer grade 3 or grade 4 adverse events than lenvatinib with everolimus or cabozantinib. HRQoL could not be analysed due to differences in tools used. CONCLUSIONS: Lenvatinib with everolimus, cabozantinib and nivolumab are effective in prolonging the survival for people with amRCC subsequent to VEGF-targeted treatment, but there is considerable uncertainty about how they compare to each other and how much better they are than axitinib and sorafenib. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017071540. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6429896 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64298962019-04-05 Targeted therapies for previously treated advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: systematic review and network meta-analysis Karner, Charlotta Kew, Kayleigh Wakefield, Victoria Masento, Natalie Edwards, Steven J BMJ Open Oncology OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of treatments for advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (amRCC) after treatment with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted treatment. DESIGN: Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative observational studies. MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched up to January 2018. PARTICIPANTS: People with amRCC requiring treatment after VEGF-targeted treatment. INTERVENTIONS: Axitinib, cabozantinib, everolimus, lenvatinib with everolimus, nivolumab, sorafenib and best supportive care (BSC). OUTCOMES: Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS); secondary outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), adverse events, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). RESULTS: Twelve studies were included (n=5144): five RCTs and seven observational studies. Lenvatinib with everolimus significantly increased OS and PFS over everolimus (HR 0.61, 95% Credible Interval [95%CrI]: 0.36 to 0.96 and 0.47, 95%CrI: 0.26 to 0.77, respectively) as did cabozantinib (HR 0.66, 95%CrI: 0.53 to 0.82 and 0.51, 95%CrI: 0.41 to 0.63, respectively). This remained the case when observational evidence was included. Nivolumab also significantly improved OS versus everolimus (HR 0.74, 95%CrI: 0.57 to 0.93). OS sensitivity analysis, including observational studies, indicates everolimus being more effective than axitinib and sorafenib. However, inconsistency was identified in the OS sensitivity analysis. PFS sensitivity analysis suggests axitinib is more effective than everolimus, which may be more effective than sorafenib. The results for ORR supported the OS and PFS analyses. Nivolumab is associated with fewer grade 3 or grade 4 adverse events than lenvatinib with everolimus or cabozantinib. HRQoL could not be analysed due to differences in tools used. CONCLUSIONS: Lenvatinib with everolimus, cabozantinib and nivolumab are effective in prolonging the survival for people with amRCC subsequent to VEGF-targeted treatment, but there is considerable uncertainty about how they compare to each other and how much better they are than axitinib and sorafenib. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017071540. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6429896/ /pubmed/30826762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024691 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Karner, Charlotta Kew, Kayleigh Wakefield, Victoria Masento, Natalie Edwards, Steven J Targeted therapies for previously treated advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title | Targeted therapies for previously treated advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full | Targeted therapies for previously treated advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Targeted therapies for previously treated advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Targeted therapies for previously treated advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_short | Targeted therapies for previously treated advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_sort | targeted therapies for previously treated advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: systematic review and network meta-analysis |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6429896/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30826762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024691 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karnercharlotta targetedtherapiesforpreviouslytreatedadvancedormetastaticrenalcellcarcinomasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT kewkayleigh targetedtherapiesforpreviouslytreatedadvancedormetastaticrenalcellcarcinomasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT wakefieldvictoria targetedtherapiesforpreviouslytreatedadvancedormetastaticrenalcellcarcinomasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT masentonatalie targetedtherapiesforpreviouslytreatedadvancedormetastaticrenalcellcarcinomasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT edwardsstevenj targetedtherapiesforpreviouslytreatedadvancedormetastaticrenalcellcarcinomasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis |