Cargando…

Outcome of surgical repair of adult digital nerve injury: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES: A systematic review to assess the evidence supporting surgical repair of digital nerve injury versus no repair in adults in terms of clinical outcomes. DESIGN: A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant systematic review with methodology based on the C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dunlop, Rebecca L E, Wormald, Justin Conrad Rosen, Jain, Abhilash
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6429897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30872549
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025443
_version_ 1783405690108248064
author Dunlop, Rebecca L E
Wormald, Justin Conrad Rosen
Jain, Abhilash
author_facet Dunlop, Rebecca L E
Wormald, Justin Conrad Rosen
Jain, Abhilash
author_sort Dunlop, Rebecca L E
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: A systematic review to assess the evidence supporting surgical repair of digital nerve injury versus no repair in adults in terms of clinical outcomes. DESIGN: A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant systematic review with methodology based on the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions. DATA SOURCES: Databases included OvidMEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, clinicaltrials.gov and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, searched from inception until 10 November 2018. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Adult digital nerve injury in which either direct repair or no repair was undertaken and an outcome measure was recorded. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Study data extracted included demographics, injury type and extent, timing, treatment details, outcome data and time points, adverse outcomes, hand therapy and return to work. The National Institute of Health quality assessment tool for case series was used to assess risk of bias. RESULTS: Thirty studies were included. One compared surgical repair with non-repair. All studies were case series of between 15 and 110 nerve injuries, with heterogeneous patient, injury and treatment characteristics. Two studies detailed nerve repair without magnification. Static 2-point discrimination (s2PD) was the most commonly reported outcome measure. Return of protective sensation was achieved in most cases in the nerve repair and no nerve repair groups. Repair resulted in better s2PD than no repair, but <25% repaired nerves achieved normal levels. Adverse outcomes were similar between repair and no repair groups. CONCLUSIONS: Only level IV evidence is available to support surgical repair of digital nerves in adults. Return of normal sensibility is uncommon and almost all unrepaired nerves regained protective sensation by 6 months and all patients declined further surgery. There was no difference in adverse outcomes. There is currently a lack of high-quality evidence to support surgical repair of digital nerve injuries in adults and further research is needed. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017065092.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6429897
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64298972019-04-05 Outcome of surgical repair of adult digital nerve injury: a systematic review Dunlop, Rebecca L E Wormald, Justin Conrad Rosen Jain, Abhilash BMJ Open Surgery OBJECTIVES: A systematic review to assess the evidence supporting surgical repair of digital nerve injury versus no repair in adults in terms of clinical outcomes. DESIGN: A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant systematic review with methodology based on the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions. DATA SOURCES: Databases included OvidMEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, clinicaltrials.gov and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, searched from inception until 10 November 2018. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Adult digital nerve injury in which either direct repair or no repair was undertaken and an outcome measure was recorded. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Study data extracted included demographics, injury type and extent, timing, treatment details, outcome data and time points, adverse outcomes, hand therapy and return to work. The National Institute of Health quality assessment tool for case series was used to assess risk of bias. RESULTS: Thirty studies were included. One compared surgical repair with non-repair. All studies were case series of between 15 and 110 nerve injuries, with heterogeneous patient, injury and treatment characteristics. Two studies detailed nerve repair without magnification. Static 2-point discrimination (s2PD) was the most commonly reported outcome measure. Return of protective sensation was achieved in most cases in the nerve repair and no nerve repair groups. Repair resulted in better s2PD than no repair, but <25% repaired nerves achieved normal levels. Adverse outcomes were similar between repair and no repair groups. CONCLUSIONS: Only level IV evidence is available to support surgical repair of digital nerves in adults. Return of normal sensibility is uncommon and almost all unrepaired nerves regained protective sensation by 6 months and all patients declined further surgery. There was no difference in adverse outcomes. There is currently a lack of high-quality evidence to support surgical repair of digital nerve injuries in adults and further research is needed. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017065092. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6429897/ /pubmed/30872549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025443 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Surgery
Dunlop, Rebecca L E
Wormald, Justin Conrad Rosen
Jain, Abhilash
Outcome of surgical repair of adult digital nerve injury: a systematic review
title Outcome of surgical repair of adult digital nerve injury: a systematic review
title_full Outcome of surgical repair of adult digital nerve injury: a systematic review
title_fullStr Outcome of surgical repair of adult digital nerve injury: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Outcome of surgical repair of adult digital nerve injury: a systematic review
title_short Outcome of surgical repair of adult digital nerve injury: a systematic review
title_sort outcome of surgical repair of adult digital nerve injury: a systematic review
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6429897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30872549
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025443
work_keys_str_mv AT dunloprebeccale outcomeofsurgicalrepairofadultdigitalnerveinjuryasystematicreview
AT wormaldjustinconradrosen outcomeofsurgicalrepairofadultdigitalnerveinjuryasystematicreview
AT jainabhilash outcomeofsurgicalrepairofadultdigitalnerveinjuryasystematicreview