Cargando…

Rationale and design of a prospective, multicentre, randomised, conventional treatment-controlled, parallel-group trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ulinastatin in preventing acute respiratory distress syndrome in high-risk patients

INTRODUCTION: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is challenging in the intensive care unit (ICU). Although pharmacotherapy for ARDS has gained increasing attention, most trials have yielded negative results. Patients with ARDS have usually been recruited as subjects; the inflammatory reactio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Zongyu, Tao, Liyuan, Yan, Yingying, Zhu, Xi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6429909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30850411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025523
_version_ 1783405691978907648
author Wang, Zongyu
Tao, Liyuan
Yan, Yingying
Zhu, Xi
author_facet Wang, Zongyu
Tao, Liyuan
Yan, Yingying
Zhu, Xi
author_sort Wang, Zongyu
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is challenging in the intensive care unit (ICU). Although pharmacotherapy for ARDS has gained increasing attention, most trials have yielded negative results. Patients with ARDS have usually been recruited as subjects; the inflammatory reaction has already expanded into a cascade at this point, and its severity is sufficient to damage the lung parenchyma. This raises the question of whether early treatment can prevent ARDS and the associated lung injury. We hypothesise that ARDS is preventable in high-risk patients by administration of ulinastatin as an anti-inflammatory drug before ARDS onset, and we are performing a study to test ulinastatin, a protease inhibitor, versus treatment-as-usual in a group of patients at increased risk for ARDS. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This report presents the protocol for a multicentre, randomised, conventional treatment-controlled, parallel group study to prevent the development of ARDS using ulinastatin in high-risk patients. The study population will comprise patients at risk of ARDS in the ICU (≥18 years of age and Lung Injury Prediction Score of >4); patients with confirmed ARDS and some other conditions (immunodeficiency, use of some drugs, etc.) will be excluded. The enrolled patients will be randomly allocated to an ulinastatin group (ulinastatin will be intravenously administered every 8 hours for a total of 600 000 U/day for five consecutive days) or control group. The efficacy of ulinastatin in preventing ARDS development will be evaluated by the incidence rate of ARDS as the primary outcome; the secondary outcomes include the severity of ARDS, clinical outcome, extrapulmonary organ function and adverse events incurred by ulinastatin. Based on the results of preliminary studies and presuming the incidence of ARDS will decrease by 9% in high-risk patients, 880 patients are needed to obtain statistical power of 80%. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Peking University Third Hospital Medical Science Research Ethics Committee. The findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03089957; Pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6429909
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64299092019-04-05 Rationale and design of a prospective, multicentre, randomised, conventional treatment-controlled, parallel-group trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ulinastatin in preventing acute respiratory distress syndrome in high-risk patients Wang, Zongyu Tao, Liyuan Yan, Yingying Zhu, Xi BMJ Open Intensive Care INTRODUCTION: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is challenging in the intensive care unit (ICU). Although pharmacotherapy for ARDS has gained increasing attention, most trials have yielded negative results. Patients with ARDS have usually been recruited as subjects; the inflammatory reaction has already expanded into a cascade at this point, and its severity is sufficient to damage the lung parenchyma. This raises the question of whether early treatment can prevent ARDS and the associated lung injury. We hypothesise that ARDS is preventable in high-risk patients by administration of ulinastatin as an anti-inflammatory drug before ARDS onset, and we are performing a study to test ulinastatin, a protease inhibitor, versus treatment-as-usual in a group of patients at increased risk for ARDS. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This report presents the protocol for a multicentre, randomised, conventional treatment-controlled, parallel group study to prevent the development of ARDS using ulinastatin in high-risk patients. The study population will comprise patients at risk of ARDS in the ICU (≥18 years of age and Lung Injury Prediction Score of >4); patients with confirmed ARDS and some other conditions (immunodeficiency, use of some drugs, etc.) will be excluded. The enrolled patients will be randomly allocated to an ulinastatin group (ulinastatin will be intravenously administered every 8 hours for a total of 600 000 U/day for five consecutive days) or control group. The efficacy of ulinastatin in preventing ARDS development will be evaluated by the incidence rate of ARDS as the primary outcome; the secondary outcomes include the severity of ARDS, clinical outcome, extrapulmonary organ function and adverse events incurred by ulinastatin. Based on the results of preliminary studies and presuming the incidence of ARDS will decrease by 9% in high-risk patients, 880 patients are needed to obtain statistical power of 80%. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Peking University Third Hospital Medical Science Research Ethics Committee. The findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03089957; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6429909/ /pubmed/30850411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025523 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Intensive Care
Wang, Zongyu
Tao, Liyuan
Yan, Yingying
Zhu, Xi
Rationale and design of a prospective, multicentre, randomised, conventional treatment-controlled, parallel-group trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ulinastatin in preventing acute respiratory distress syndrome in high-risk patients
title Rationale and design of a prospective, multicentre, randomised, conventional treatment-controlled, parallel-group trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ulinastatin in preventing acute respiratory distress syndrome in high-risk patients
title_full Rationale and design of a prospective, multicentre, randomised, conventional treatment-controlled, parallel-group trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ulinastatin in preventing acute respiratory distress syndrome in high-risk patients
title_fullStr Rationale and design of a prospective, multicentre, randomised, conventional treatment-controlled, parallel-group trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ulinastatin in preventing acute respiratory distress syndrome in high-risk patients
title_full_unstemmed Rationale and design of a prospective, multicentre, randomised, conventional treatment-controlled, parallel-group trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ulinastatin in preventing acute respiratory distress syndrome in high-risk patients
title_short Rationale and design of a prospective, multicentre, randomised, conventional treatment-controlled, parallel-group trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ulinastatin in preventing acute respiratory distress syndrome in high-risk patients
title_sort rationale and design of a prospective, multicentre, randomised, conventional treatment-controlled, parallel-group trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ulinastatin in preventing acute respiratory distress syndrome in high-risk patients
topic Intensive Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6429909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30850411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025523
work_keys_str_mv AT wangzongyu rationaleanddesignofaprospectivemulticentrerandomisedconventionaltreatmentcontrolledparallelgrouptrialtoevaluatetheefficacyandsafetyofulinastatininpreventingacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeinhighriskpatients
AT taoliyuan rationaleanddesignofaprospectivemulticentrerandomisedconventionaltreatmentcontrolledparallelgrouptrialtoevaluatetheefficacyandsafetyofulinastatininpreventingacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeinhighriskpatients
AT yanyingying rationaleanddesignofaprospectivemulticentrerandomisedconventionaltreatmentcontrolledparallelgrouptrialtoevaluatetheefficacyandsafetyofulinastatininpreventingacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeinhighriskpatients
AT zhuxi rationaleanddesignofaprospectivemulticentrerandomisedconventionaltreatmentcontrolledparallelgrouptrialtoevaluatetheefficacyandsafetyofulinastatininpreventingacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeinhighriskpatients