Cargando…

Multilevel model of stigma and barriers to cancer palliative care in India: a qualitative study

INTRODUCTION: Palliative care coverage and opioid consumption in India are relatively low compared with global data. The literature suggests commonplace concealment and collusion in withholding information, but these hypotheses lack evidence. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to develop an explanatory ev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harding, Richard, Nair, Shoba, Ekstrand, Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6429952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30837250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024248
_version_ 1783405698920480768
author Harding, Richard
Nair, Shoba
Ekstrand, Maria
author_facet Harding, Richard
Nair, Shoba
Ekstrand, Maria
author_sort Harding, Richard
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Palliative care coverage and opioid consumption in India are relatively low compared with global data. The literature suggests commonplace concealment and collusion in withholding information, but these hypotheses lack evidence. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to develop an explanatory evidence-based model of stigma, communication and access to cancer palliative care in India that can be used to develop, test and implement future interventions. DESIGN: This cross-sectional qualitative study sampled advanced cancer patients (n=10), their family caregivers (n=10) and oncologists (n=10). Grounded theory procedures were utilised to analyse transcripts, and a theoretical model generated. SETTING: A tertiary teaching hospital in South India. RESULTS: The model explains how stigma associated with communicating a diagnosis of advanced cancer is enacted by treating oncologists, family members and community. This leads to patient expectations of cure and futile treatment uptake. Patients commonly only present needs with respect to pain, not within psychological, social or spiritual domains, likely due to the lack of patients’ insight into their diagnosis and prognosis. As a result of oncologists’ and families’ unwillingness to disclose the prognosis, and patient focus on pain due to their lack of insight, palliative care clinicians view their services as under-utilised, and patients perceive palliative care as a pain management service that is not ‘different’ from other clinical services. Advanced care needs and purchase of futile treatments lead to lost employment among families, increased family debt and high care costs, which are rarely disclosed due to their unwillingness to discuss their needs. CONCLUSION: Our novel theoretical model is an essential first step to ensure that complex interventions are plausible, with mechanisms of action that address the needs of relevant stakeholders. A family-centred approach with an oncology workforce skilled in communication and an enabled patient population could increase access to palliative care, and improved outcomes may be attainable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6429952
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64299522019-04-05 Multilevel model of stigma and barriers to cancer palliative care in India: a qualitative study Harding, Richard Nair, Shoba Ekstrand, Maria BMJ Open Palliative Care INTRODUCTION: Palliative care coverage and opioid consumption in India are relatively low compared with global data. The literature suggests commonplace concealment and collusion in withholding information, but these hypotheses lack evidence. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to develop an explanatory evidence-based model of stigma, communication and access to cancer palliative care in India that can be used to develop, test and implement future interventions. DESIGN: This cross-sectional qualitative study sampled advanced cancer patients (n=10), their family caregivers (n=10) and oncologists (n=10). Grounded theory procedures were utilised to analyse transcripts, and a theoretical model generated. SETTING: A tertiary teaching hospital in South India. RESULTS: The model explains how stigma associated with communicating a diagnosis of advanced cancer is enacted by treating oncologists, family members and community. This leads to patient expectations of cure and futile treatment uptake. Patients commonly only present needs with respect to pain, not within psychological, social or spiritual domains, likely due to the lack of patients’ insight into their diagnosis and prognosis. As a result of oncologists’ and families’ unwillingness to disclose the prognosis, and patient focus on pain due to their lack of insight, palliative care clinicians view their services as under-utilised, and patients perceive palliative care as a pain management service that is not ‘different’ from other clinical services. Advanced care needs and purchase of futile treatments lead to lost employment among families, increased family debt and high care costs, which are rarely disclosed due to their unwillingness to discuss their needs. CONCLUSION: Our novel theoretical model is an essential first step to ensure that complex interventions are plausible, with mechanisms of action that address the needs of relevant stakeholders. A family-centred approach with an oncology workforce skilled in communication and an enabled patient population could increase access to palliative care, and improved outcomes may be attainable. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6429952/ /pubmed/30837250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024248 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Palliative Care
Harding, Richard
Nair, Shoba
Ekstrand, Maria
Multilevel model of stigma and barriers to cancer palliative care in India: a qualitative study
title Multilevel model of stigma and barriers to cancer palliative care in India: a qualitative study
title_full Multilevel model of stigma and barriers to cancer palliative care in India: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Multilevel model of stigma and barriers to cancer palliative care in India: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Multilevel model of stigma and barriers to cancer palliative care in India: a qualitative study
title_short Multilevel model of stigma and barriers to cancer palliative care in India: a qualitative study
title_sort multilevel model of stigma and barriers to cancer palliative care in india: a qualitative study
topic Palliative Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6429952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30837250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024248
work_keys_str_mv AT hardingrichard multilevelmodelofstigmaandbarrierstocancerpalliativecareinindiaaqualitativestudy
AT nairshoba multilevelmodelofstigmaandbarrierstocancerpalliativecareinindiaaqualitativestudy
AT ekstrandmaria multilevelmodelofstigmaandbarrierstocancerpalliativecareinindiaaqualitativestudy