Cargando…

Reporting guidelines for health research: protocol for a cross-sectional analysis of the EQUATOR Network Library

INTRODUCTION: Transparency and completeness of health research is highly variable, with important deficiencies in the reporting of methods and results of studies. Reporting guidelines aim to improve transparency and quality of research reports, and are often developed by consortia of journal editors...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Catalá-López, Ferrán, Alonso-Arroyo, Adolfo, Page, Matthew J, Hutton, Brian, Ridao, Manuel, Tabarés-Seisdedos, Rafael, Aleixandre-Benavent, Rafael, Moher, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6429992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30837245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022769
_version_ 1783405705484566528
author Catalá-López, Ferrán
Alonso-Arroyo, Adolfo
Page, Matthew J
Hutton, Brian
Ridao, Manuel
Tabarés-Seisdedos, Rafael
Aleixandre-Benavent, Rafael
Moher, David
author_facet Catalá-López, Ferrán
Alonso-Arroyo, Adolfo
Page, Matthew J
Hutton, Brian
Ridao, Manuel
Tabarés-Seisdedos, Rafael
Aleixandre-Benavent, Rafael
Moher, David
author_sort Catalá-López, Ferrán
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Transparency and completeness of health research is highly variable, with important deficiencies in the reporting of methods and results of studies. Reporting guidelines aim to improve transparency and quality of research reports, and are often developed by consortia of journal editors, peer reviewers, authors, consumers and other key stakeholders. The objective of this study will be to investigate the characteristics of scientific collaboration among developers and the citation metrics of reporting guidelines of health research. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is the study protocol for a cross-sectional analysis of completed reporting guidelines indexed in the Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research Network Library. We will search PubMed/MEDLINE and the Web of Science. Screening, selection and data abstraction will be conducted by one researcher and verified by a second researcher. Potential discrepancies will be resolved via discussion. We will include published papers of reporting guidelines written in English. Published papers will have to meet the definition of a reporting guideline related to health research (eg, a checklist, flow diagram or explicit text), with no restrictions by study design, medical specialty, disease or condition. Raw data from each included paper (including title, publication year, journal, subject category, keywords, citations, and the authors’ names, author’s affiliated institution and country) will be exported from the Web of Science. Descriptive analyses will be conducted (including the number of papers, citations, authors, countries, journals, keywords and main collaboration metrics). We will identify the most prolific authors, institutions, countries, journals and the most cited papers. Network analyses will be carried out to study the structure of collaborations. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval will be required. Findings from this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals. All data will be deposited in a cross-disciplinary public repository. It is anticipated the study findings could be relevant to a variety of audiences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6429992
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64299922019-04-05 Reporting guidelines for health research: protocol for a cross-sectional analysis of the EQUATOR Network Library Catalá-López, Ferrán Alonso-Arroyo, Adolfo Page, Matthew J Hutton, Brian Ridao, Manuel Tabarés-Seisdedos, Rafael Aleixandre-Benavent, Rafael Moher, David BMJ Open Medical Publishing and Peer Review INTRODUCTION: Transparency and completeness of health research is highly variable, with important deficiencies in the reporting of methods and results of studies. Reporting guidelines aim to improve transparency and quality of research reports, and are often developed by consortia of journal editors, peer reviewers, authors, consumers and other key stakeholders. The objective of this study will be to investigate the characteristics of scientific collaboration among developers and the citation metrics of reporting guidelines of health research. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is the study protocol for a cross-sectional analysis of completed reporting guidelines indexed in the Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research Network Library. We will search PubMed/MEDLINE and the Web of Science. Screening, selection and data abstraction will be conducted by one researcher and verified by a second researcher. Potential discrepancies will be resolved via discussion. We will include published papers of reporting guidelines written in English. Published papers will have to meet the definition of a reporting guideline related to health research (eg, a checklist, flow diagram or explicit text), with no restrictions by study design, medical specialty, disease or condition. Raw data from each included paper (including title, publication year, journal, subject category, keywords, citations, and the authors’ names, author’s affiliated institution and country) will be exported from the Web of Science. Descriptive analyses will be conducted (including the number of papers, citations, authors, countries, journals, keywords and main collaboration metrics). We will identify the most prolific authors, institutions, countries, journals and the most cited papers. Network analyses will be carried out to study the structure of collaborations. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval will be required. Findings from this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals. All data will be deposited in a cross-disciplinary public repository. It is anticipated the study findings could be relevant to a variety of audiences. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6429992/ /pubmed/30837245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022769 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Medical Publishing and Peer Review
Catalá-López, Ferrán
Alonso-Arroyo, Adolfo
Page, Matthew J
Hutton, Brian
Ridao, Manuel
Tabarés-Seisdedos, Rafael
Aleixandre-Benavent, Rafael
Moher, David
Reporting guidelines for health research: protocol for a cross-sectional analysis of the EQUATOR Network Library
title Reporting guidelines for health research: protocol for a cross-sectional analysis of the EQUATOR Network Library
title_full Reporting guidelines for health research: protocol for a cross-sectional analysis of the EQUATOR Network Library
title_fullStr Reporting guidelines for health research: protocol for a cross-sectional analysis of the EQUATOR Network Library
title_full_unstemmed Reporting guidelines for health research: protocol for a cross-sectional analysis of the EQUATOR Network Library
title_short Reporting guidelines for health research: protocol for a cross-sectional analysis of the EQUATOR Network Library
title_sort reporting guidelines for health research: protocol for a cross-sectional analysis of the equator network library
topic Medical Publishing and Peer Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6429992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30837245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022769
work_keys_str_mv AT catalalopezferran reportingguidelinesforhealthresearchprotocolforacrosssectionalanalysisoftheequatornetworklibrary
AT alonsoarroyoadolfo reportingguidelinesforhealthresearchprotocolforacrosssectionalanalysisoftheequatornetworklibrary
AT pagematthewj reportingguidelinesforhealthresearchprotocolforacrosssectionalanalysisoftheequatornetworklibrary
AT huttonbrian reportingguidelinesforhealthresearchprotocolforacrosssectionalanalysisoftheequatornetworklibrary
AT ridaomanuel reportingguidelinesforhealthresearchprotocolforacrosssectionalanalysisoftheequatornetworklibrary
AT tabaresseisdedosrafael reportingguidelinesforhealthresearchprotocolforacrosssectionalanalysisoftheequatornetworklibrary
AT aleixandrebenaventrafael reportingguidelinesforhealthresearchprotocolforacrosssectionalanalysisoftheequatornetworklibrary
AT moherdavid reportingguidelinesforhealthresearchprotocolforacrosssectionalanalysisoftheequatornetworklibrary