Cargando…

Evaluating 3D-printed models of coronary anomalies: a survey among clinicians and researchers at a university hospital in the UK

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of three-dimensional (3D) printing models of coronary artery anomalies based on cardiac CT data and explore their potential for clinical applications. DESIGN: Cardiac CT datasets of patients with various coronary artery anomalies (n=8) were retrospectively revi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Matthew, Moharem-Elgamal, Sarah, Beckingham, Rylan, Hamilton, Mark, Manghat, Nathan, Milano, Elena Giulia, Bucciarelli-Ducci, Chiara, Caputo, Massimo, Biglino, Giovanni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6430025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30852545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025227
_version_ 1783405713509318656
author Lee, Matthew
Moharem-Elgamal, Sarah
Beckingham, Rylan
Hamilton, Mark
Manghat, Nathan
Milano, Elena Giulia
Bucciarelli-Ducci, Chiara
Caputo, Massimo
Biglino, Giovanni
author_facet Lee, Matthew
Moharem-Elgamal, Sarah
Beckingham, Rylan
Hamilton, Mark
Manghat, Nathan
Milano, Elena Giulia
Bucciarelli-Ducci, Chiara
Caputo, Massimo
Biglino, Giovanni
author_sort Lee, Matthew
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of three-dimensional (3D) printing models of coronary artery anomalies based on cardiac CT data and explore their potential for clinical applications. DESIGN: Cardiac CT datasets of patients with various coronary artery anomalies (n=8) were retrospectively reviewed and processed, reconstructing detailed 3D models to be printed in-house with a desktop 3D printer (Form 2, Formlabs) using white resin. SETTING: A University Hospital (division of cardiology) in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: The CT scans, first and then 3D-printed models were presented to groups of clinicians (n=8) and cardiovascular researchers (n=9). INTERVENTION: Participants were asked to assess different features of the 3D models and to rate the models’ overall potential usefulness. OUTCOME MEASURES: Models were rated according to clarity of anatomical detail, insight into the coronary abnormality, overall perceived usefulness and comparison to CT scans. Assessment of model characteristics used Likert-type questions (5-point scale from ‘strongly disagree’ to ‘strongly agree’) or a 10-point rating (from 0, lowest, to 10, highest). The questionnaire included a feedback form summarising overall usefulness. Participants’ imaging experience (in a number of years) was also recorded. RESULTS: All models were reconstructed and printed successfully, with accurate details showing coronary anatomy (eg, anomalous coronary artery, coronary roofing or coronary aneurysm in a patient with Kawasaki syndrome). All clinicians and researchers provided feedback, with both groups finding the models helpful in displaying coronary artery anatomy and abnormalities, and complementary to viewing 3D CT scans. The clinicians’ group, who had substantially more imaging expertise, provided more enthusiastic ratings in terms of models’ clarity, usefulness and future use on average. CONCLUSIONS: 3D-printed heart models can be feasibly used to recreate coronary artery anatomy and enhance understanding of coronary abnormalities. Future studies can evaluate their cost-effectiveness, as well as potentially explore other printing techniques and materials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6430025
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64300252019-04-05 Evaluating 3D-printed models of coronary anomalies: a survey among clinicians and researchers at a university hospital in the UK Lee, Matthew Moharem-Elgamal, Sarah Beckingham, Rylan Hamilton, Mark Manghat, Nathan Milano, Elena Giulia Bucciarelli-Ducci, Chiara Caputo, Massimo Biglino, Giovanni BMJ Open Cardiovascular Medicine OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of three-dimensional (3D) printing models of coronary artery anomalies based on cardiac CT data and explore their potential for clinical applications. DESIGN: Cardiac CT datasets of patients with various coronary artery anomalies (n=8) were retrospectively reviewed and processed, reconstructing detailed 3D models to be printed in-house with a desktop 3D printer (Form 2, Formlabs) using white resin. SETTING: A University Hospital (division of cardiology) in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: The CT scans, first and then 3D-printed models were presented to groups of clinicians (n=8) and cardiovascular researchers (n=9). INTERVENTION: Participants were asked to assess different features of the 3D models and to rate the models’ overall potential usefulness. OUTCOME MEASURES: Models were rated according to clarity of anatomical detail, insight into the coronary abnormality, overall perceived usefulness and comparison to CT scans. Assessment of model characteristics used Likert-type questions (5-point scale from ‘strongly disagree’ to ‘strongly agree’) or a 10-point rating (from 0, lowest, to 10, highest). The questionnaire included a feedback form summarising overall usefulness. Participants’ imaging experience (in a number of years) was also recorded. RESULTS: All models were reconstructed and printed successfully, with accurate details showing coronary anatomy (eg, anomalous coronary artery, coronary roofing or coronary aneurysm in a patient with Kawasaki syndrome). All clinicians and researchers provided feedback, with both groups finding the models helpful in displaying coronary artery anatomy and abnormalities, and complementary to viewing 3D CT scans. The clinicians’ group, who had substantially more imaging expertise, provided more enthusiastic ratings in terms of models’ clarity, usefulness and future use on average. CONCLUSIONS: 3D-printed heart models can be feasibly used to recreate coronary artery anatomy and enhance understanding of coronary abnormalities. Future studies can evaluate their cost-effectiveness, as well as potentially explore other printing techniques and materials. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6430025/ /pubmed/30852545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025227 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Lee, Matthew
Moharem-Elgamal, Sarah
Beckingham, Rylan
Hamilton, Mark
Manghat, Nathan
Milano, Elena Giulia
Bucciarelli-Ducci, Chiara
Caputo, Massimo
Biglino, Giovanni
Evaluating 3D-printed models of coronary anomalies: a survey among clinicians and researchers at a university hospital in the UK
title Evaluating 3D-printed models of coronary anomalies: a survey among clinicians and researchers at a university hospital in the UK
title_full Evaluating 3D-printed models of coronary anomalies: a survey among clinicians and researchers at a university hospital in the UK
title_fullStr Evaluating 3D-printed models of coronary anomalies: a survey among clinicians and researchers at a university hospital in the UK
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating 3D-printed models of coronary anomalies: a survey among clinicians and researchers at a university hospital in the UK
title_short Evaluating 3D-printed models of coronary anomalies: a survey among clinicians and researchers at a university hospital in the UK
title_sort evaluating 3d-printed models of coronary anomalies: a survey among clinicians and researchers at a university hospital in the uk
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6430025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30852545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025227
work_keys_str_mv AT leematthew evaluating3dprintedmodelsofcoronaryanomaliesasurveyamongcliniciansandresearchersatauniversityhospitalintheuk
AT moharemelgamalsarah evaluating3dprintedmodelsofcoronaryanomaliesasurveyamongcliniciansandresearchersatauniversityhospitalintheuk
AT beckinghamrylan evaluating3dprintedmodelsofcoronaryanomaliesasurveyamongcliniciansandresearchersatauniversityhospitalintheuk
AT hamiltonmark evaluating3dprintedmodelsofcoronaryanomaliesasurveyamongcliniciansandresearchersatauniversityhospitalintheuk
AT manghatnathan evaluating3dprintedmodelsofcoronaryanomaliesasurveyamongcliniciansandresearchersatauniversityhospitalintheuk
AT milanoelenagiulia evaluating3dprintedmodelsofcoronaryanomaliesasurveyamongcliniciansandresearchersatauniversityhospitalintheuk
AT bucciarelliduccichiara evaluating3dprintedmodelsofcoronaryanomaliesasurveyamongcliniciansandresearchersatauniversityhospitalintheuk
AT caputomassimo evaluating3dprintedmodelsofcoronaryanomaliesasurveyamongcliniciansandresearchersatauniversityhospitalintheuk
AT biglinogiovanni evaluating3dprintedmodelsofcoronaryanomaliesasurveyamongcliniciansandresearchersatauniversityhospitalintheuk