Cargando…

Concurrent chemo-radiotherapy for unresectable non–small cell lung cancer invading adjacent great vessels on radiologic findings: is it safe?

We performed a retrospective analysis to evaluate treatment outcomes and the risk of fatal hemorrhage by tumor regression when definitive concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) was delivered to patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) invading adjacent great vessels on radiological findings. W...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoo, Gyu Sang, Oh, Dongryul, Pyo, Hongryull, Ahn, Yong Chan, Noh, Jae Myung, Park, Hee Chul, Lim, Do Hoon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6430246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30544255
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rry102
_version_ 1783405746532122624
author Yoo, Gyu Sang
Oh, Dongryul
Pyo, Hongryull
Ahn, Yong Chan
Noh, Jae Myung
Park, Hee Chul
Lim, Do Hoon
author_facet Yoo, Gyu Sang
Oh, Dongryul
Pyo, Hongryull
Ahn, Yong Chan
Noh, Jae Myung
Park, Hee Chul
Lim, Do Hoon
author_sort Yoo, Gyu Sang
collection PubMed
description We performed a retrospective analysis to evaluate treatment outcomes and the risk of fatal hemorrhage by tumor regression when definitive concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) was delivered to patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) invading adjacent great vessels on radiological findings. We selected 37 unresectable NSCLC patients with adjacent great vessel invasion (GVI) by carefully reviewing each patient’s images. The criteria of definite GVI were as follows: irregular indentation at the tumor–vessel contact border, slit-like narrowing of adjacent great vessels by the tumor, presence of intra-luminal mass formation, tumors contacting >5 cm of adjacent great vessel and obliteration of the intervening fat plane between tumor and adjacent great vessel, and/or tumors contacting more than half of the circumference of the aortic wall. All of the patients completed the CCRT, of which the median dose was 66.0 Gy (range, 59.4–72.0 Gy) with 1.8 or 2.0 Gy per fraction. The 2-year overall survival (OS) rate for total patients was 48.2%. Early nodal staging (P = 0.006) and good performance status (P = 0.044) were identified as independent prognostic factors associated with better OS. There was no fatal complication related to the GVI, such as a sudden death or massive hemoptysis due to vascular rupture after CCRT. We concluded that definitive CCRT for NSCLC patients with GVI on radiological findings has a low risk of fatal complication and it can benefit long-term survival when treated with CCRT in patients with early nodal staging or good performance status.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6430246
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64302462019-03-26 Concurrent chemo-radiotherapy for unresectable non–small cell lung cancer invading adjacent great vessels on radiologic findings: is it safe? Yoo, Gyu Sang Oh, Dongryul Pyo, Hongryull Ahn, Yong Chan Noh, Jae Myung Park, Hee Chul Lim, Do Hoon J Radiat Res Regular Paper We performed a retrospective analysis to evaluate treatment outcomes and the risk of fatal hemorrhage by tumor regression when definitive concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) was delivered to patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) invading adjacent great vessels on radiological findings. We selected 37 unresectable NSCLC patients with adjacent great vessel invasion (GVI) by carefully reviewing each patient’s images. The criteria of definite GVI were as follows: irregular indentation at the tumor–vessel contact border, slit-like narrowing of adjacent great vessels by the tumor, presence of intra-luminal mass formation, tumors contacting >5 cm of adjacent great vessel and obliteration of the intervening fat plane between tumor and adjacent great vessel, and/or tumors contacting more than half of the circumference of the aortic wall. All of the patients completed the CCRT, of which the median dose was 66.0 Gy (range, 59.4–72.0 Gy) with 1.8 or 2.0 Gy per fraction. The 2-year overall survival (OS) rate for total patients was 48.2%. Early nodal staging (P = 0.006) and good performance status (P = 0.044) were identified as independent prognostic factors associated with better OS. There was no fatal complication related to the GVI, such as a sudden death or massive hemoptysis due to vascular rupture after CCRT. We concluded that definitive CCRT for NSCLC patients with GVI on radiological findings has a low risk of fatal complication and it can benefit long-term survival when treated with CCRT in patients with early nodal staging or good performance status. Oxford University Press 2019-03 2018-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6430246/ /pubmed/30544255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rry102 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Regular Paper
Yoo, Gyu Sang
Oh, Dongryul
Pyo, Hongryull
Ahn, Yong Chan
Noh, Jae Myung
Park, Hee Chul
Lim, Do Hoon
Concurrent chemo-radiotherapy for unresectable non–small cell lung cancer invading adjacent great vessels on radiologic findings: is it safe?
title Concurrent chemo-radiotherapy for unresectable non–small cell lung cancer invading adjacent great vessels on radiologic findings: is it safe?
title_full Concurrent chemo-radiotherapy for unresectable non–small cell lung cancer invading adjacent great vessels on radiologic findings: is it safe?
title_fullStr Concurrent chemo-radiotherapy for unresectable non–small cell lung cancer invading adjacent great vessels on radiologic findings: is it safe?
title_full_unstemmed Concurrent chemo-radiotherapy for unresectable non–small cell lung cancer invading adjacent great vessels on radiologic findings: is it safe?
title_short Concurrent chemo-radiotherapy for unresectable non–small cell lung cancer invading adjacent great vessels on radiologic findings: is it safe?
title_sort concurrent chemo-radiotherapy for unresectable non–small cell lung cancer invading adjacent great vessels on radiologic findings: is it safe?
topic Regular Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6430246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30544255
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rry102
work_keys_str_mv AT yoogyusang concurrentchemoradiotherapyforunresectablenonsmallcelllungcancerinvadingadjacentgreatvesselsonradiologicfindingsisitsafe
AT ohdongryul concurrentchemoradiotherapyforunresectablenonsmallcelllungcancerinvadingadjacentgreatvesselsonradiologicfindingsisitsafe
AT pyohongryull concurrentchemoradiotherapyforunresectablenonsmallcelllungcancerinvadingadjacentgreatvesselsonradiologicfindingsisitsafe
AT ahnyongchan concurrentchemoradiotherapyforunresectablenonsmallcelllungcancerinvadingadjacentgreatvesselsonradiologicfindingsisitsafe
AT nohjaemyung concurrentchemoradiotherapyforunresectablenonsmallcelllungcancerinvadingadjacentgreatvesselsonradiologicfindingsisitsafe
AT parkheechul concurrentchemoradiotherapyforunresectablenonsmallcelllungcancerinvadingadjacentgreatvesselsonradiologicfindingsisitsafe
AT limdohoon concurrentchemoradiotherapyforunresectablenonsmallcelllungcancerinvadingadjacentgreatvesselsonradiologicfindingsisitsafe