Cargando…
Safety and Efficacy of Low-Volume Preparation in the Elderly: Oral Sulfate Solution on the Day before and Split-Dose Regimens (SEE SAFE) Study
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The use of a low-volume bowel cleansing agent is associated with a greater willingness to undergo repeat colonoscopy. Oral sulfate solution (OSS) is a recently approved low-volume agent; however, its efficacy and safety in the elderly population remain unclear. We aimed to evaluate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Editorial Office of Gut and Liver
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6430430/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30400725 http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl18214 |
_version_ | 1783405772297732096 |
---|---|
author | Kwak, Min Seob Cha, Jae Myung Yang, Hyo-Joon Park, Dong Il Kim, Kyeong Ok Lee, Jun Shin, Jeong Eun Joo, Young-Eun Park, Jongha Byeon, Jeong-Sik Kim, Hyun Gun |
author_facet | Kwak, Min Seob Cha, Jae Myung Yang, Hyo-Joon Park, Dong Il Kim, Kyeong Ok Lee, Jun Shin, Jeong Eun Joo, Young-Eun Park, Jongha Byeon, Jeong-Sik Kim, Hyun Gun |
author_sort | Kwak, Min Seob |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIMS: The use of a low-volume bowel cleansing agent is associated with a greater willingness to undergo repeat colonoscopy. Oral sulfate solution (OSS) is a recently approved low-volume agent; however, its efficacy and safety in the elderly population remain unclear. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of the OSS preparation, in comparison to those of a standard polyethylene glycol (PEG; 4 L) preparation, in elderly patients. METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, investigator-blinded study was conducted. Participants were randomized to receive OSS or 4-L PEG with a split-dose regimen. Bowel cleansing efficacy was assessed using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). Acceptance, satisfaction, and preparation-related symptoms were recorded. Additionally, blood parameters were analyzed for electrolyte abnormalities and nephrotoxicity. RESULTS: A total of 193 patients were analyzed. No group differences in overall bowel cleansing efficacy were observed, with “adequate” preparations achieved in 95.9% (93/97) and 94.8% (91/96) of patients in the OSS and 4L PEG groups, respectively (p=0.747). However, mean BBPS scores for the entire (p=0.010) and right colon (p=0.001) were significantly higher in the OSS group than in the 4-L PEG group. The severity of clinical adverse events and frequency of acute kidney injury were similarly low, and no clinically meaningful electrolyte changes were identified. Self-reported scores regarding amount (p<0.001) and feeling (p=0.007), as well as overall satisfaction (p=0.001) and willingness to repeat the preparation (92.8% vs 67.7%, p<0.001), were significantly better in the OSS group than in the 4-L PEG group. CONCLUSIONS: In elderly individuals, OSS with a split-dose regimen has greater acceptability and comparable efficacy in bowel cleansing compared to 4-L PEG. (Clinical trials registration number: NCT03112967) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6430430 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Editorial Office of Gut and Liver |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64304302019-04-01 Safety and Efficacy of Low-Volume Preparation in the Elderly: Oral Sulfate Solution on the Day before and Split-Dose Regimens (SEE SAFE) Study Kwak, Min Seob Cha, Jae Myung Yang, Hyo-Joon Park, Dong Il Kim, Kyeong Ok Lee, Jun Shin, Jeong Eun Joo, Young-Eun Park, Jongha Byeon, Jeong-Sik Kim, Hyun Gun Gut Liver Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: The use of a low-volume bowel cleansing agent is associated with a greater willingness to undergo repeat colonoscopy. Oral sulfate solution (OSS) is a recently approved low-volume agent; however, its efficacy and safety in the elderly population remain unclear. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of the OSS preparation, in comparison to those of a standard polyethylene glycol (PEG; 4 L) preparation, in elderly patients. METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, investigator-blinded study was conducted. Participants were randomized to receive OSS or 4-L PEG with a split-dose regimen. Bowel cleansing efficacy was assessed using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). Acceptance, satisfaction, and preparation-related symptoms were recorded. Additionally, blood parameters were analyzed for electrolyte abnormalities and nephrotoxicity. RESULTS: A total of 193 patients were analyzed. No group differences in overall bowel cleansing efficacy were observed, with “adequate” preparations achieved in 95.9% (93/97) and 94.8% (91/96) of patients in the OSS and 4L PEG groups, respectively (p=0.747). However, mean BBPS scores for the entire (p=0.010) and right colon (p=0.001) were significantly higher in the OSS group than in the 4-L PEG group. The severity of clinical adverse events and frequency of acute kidney injury were similarly low, and no clinically meaningful electrolyte changes were identified. Self-reported scores regarding amount (p<0.001) and feeling (p=0.007), as well as overall satisfaction (p=0.001) and willingness to repeat the preparation (92.8% vs 67.7%, p<0.001), were significantly better in the OSS group than in the 4-L PEG group. CONCLUSIONS: In elderly individuals, OSS with a split-dose regimen has greater acceptability and comparable efficacy in bowel cleansing compared to 4-L PEG. (Clinical trials registration number: NCT03112967) Editorial Office of Gut and Liver 2019-03 2019-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6430430/ /pubmed/30400725 http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl18214 Text en Copyright © 2019 by The Korean Society of Gastroenterology, the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, the Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Korean Association the Study of Intestinal Diseases, the Korean Association for the Study of the Liver, Korean Pancreatobiliary Association, and Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kwak, Min Seob Cha, Jae Myung Yang, Hyo-Joon Park, Dong Il Kim, Kyeong Ok Lee, Jun Shin, Jeong Eun Joo, Young-Eun Park, Jongha Byeon, Jeong-Sik Kim, Hyun Gun Safety and Efficacy of Low-Volume Preparation in the Elderly: Oral Sulfate Solution on the Day before and Split-Dose Regimens (SEE SAFE) Study |
title | Safety and Efficacy of Low-Volume Preparation in the Elderly: Oral Sulfate Solution on the Day before and Split-Dose Regimens (SEE SAFE) Study |
title_full | Safety and Efficacy of Low-Volume Preparation in the Elderly: Oral Sulfate Solution on the Day before and Split-Dose Regimens (SEE SAFE) Study |
title_fullStr | Safety and Efficacy of Low-Volume Preparation in the Elderly: Oral Sulfate Solution on the Day before and Split-Dose Regimens (SEE SAFE) Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and Efficacy of Low-Volume Preparation in the Elderly: Oral Sulfate Solution on the Day before and Split-Dose Regimens (SEE SAFE) Study |
title_short | Safety and Efficacy of Low-Volume Preparation in the Elderly: Oral Sulfate Solution on the Day before and Split-Dose Regimens (SEE SAFE) Study |
title_sort | safety and efficacy of low-volume preparation in the elderly: oral sulfate solution on the day before and split-dose regimens (see safe) study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6430430/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30400725 http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl18214 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kwakminseob safetyandefficacyoflowvolumepreparationintheelderlyoralsulfatesolutiononthedaybeforeandsplitdoseregimensseesafestudy AT chajaemyung safetyandefficacyoflowvolumepreparationintheelderlyoralsulfatesolutiononthedaybeforeandsplitdoseregimensseesafestudy AT yanghyojoon safetyandefficacyoflowvolumepreparationintheelderlyoralsulfatesolutiononthedaybeforeandsplitdoseregimensseesafestudy AT parkdongil safetyandefficacyoflowvolumepreparationintheelderlyoralsulfatesolutiononthedaybeforeandsplitdoseregimensseesafestudy AT kimkyeongok safetyandefficacyoflowvolumepreparationintheelderlyoralsulfatesolutiononthedaybeforeandsplitdoseregimensseesafestudy AT leejun safetyandefficacyoflowvolumepreparationintheelderlyoralsulfatesolutiononthedaybeforeandsplitdoseregimensseesafestudy AT shinjeongeun safetyandefficacyoflowvolumepreparationintheelderlyoralsulfatesolutiononthedaybeforeandsplitdoseregimensseesafestudy AT jooyoungeun safetyandefficacyoflowvolumepreparationintheelderlyoralsulfatesolutiononthedaybeforeandsplitdoseregimensseesafestudy AT parkjongha safetyandefficacyoflowvolumepreparationintheelderlyoralsulfatesolutiononthedaybeforeandsplitdoseregimensseesafestudy AT byeonjeongsik safetyandefficacyoflowvolumepreparationintheelderlyoralsulfatesolutiononthedaybeforeandsplitdoseregimensseesafestudy AT kimhyungun safetyandefficacyoflowvolumepreparationintheelderlyoralsulfatesolutiononthedaybeforeandsplitdoseregimensseesafestudy AT safetyandefficacyoflowvolumepreparationintheelderlyoralsulfatesolutiononthedaybeforeandsplitdoseregimensseesafestudy |