Cargando…

Value of CT‐guided Core Needle Biopsy in Diagnosing Spinal Lesions: A Comparison Study

OBJECTIVE: A retrospective study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of CT‐guided core needle biopsy in diagnosing spinal lesions through comparison with C‐arm guidance. METHODS: From April 2013 to July 2017, a total of 188 patients, who suffered from spinal lesions or had malignant tumor his...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liang, Yun, Liu, Peng, Jiang, Li‐bo, Wang, Hou‐lei, Hu, An‐nan, Zhou, Xiao‐gang, Li, Xi‐lei, Lin, Hong, Wu, Dong, Dong, Jian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6430454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30767427
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12418
_version_ 1783405776077848576
author Liang, Yun
Liu, Peng
Jiang, Li‐bo
Wang, Hou‐lei
Hu, An‐nan
Zhou, Xiao‐gang
Li, Xi‐lei
Lin, Hong
Wu, Dong
Dong, Jian
author_facet Liang, Yun
Liu, Peng
Jiang, Li‐bo
Wang, Hou‐lei
Hu, An‐nan
Zhou, Xiao‐gang
Li, Xi‐lei
Lin, Hong
Wu, Dong
Dong, Jian
author_sort Liang, Yun
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: A retrospective study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of CT‐guided core needle biopsy in diagnosing spinal lesions through comparison with C‐arm guidance. METHODS: From April 2013 to July 2017, a total of 188 patients, who suffered from spinal lesions or had malignant tumor history with a new spinal fracture, were included in this study. There were 96 men and 92 women, with an average of 57.1 years. A total of 238 core needle biopsies were performed. A total of 140 core needle biopsies were carried out under C‐arm guidance in 102 patients (group 1); 98 core needle biopsies were carried out under CT guidance in 86 patients (group 2); 108 core needle biopsies were performed in thoracic vertebrae, 116 were in lumbar vertebrae, and 14 were in sacral vertebrae. Seventy‐eight patients accepted surgical treatment after biopsies. For these patients, the histological pathologies of the biopsy and surgery were compared to evaluate the accuracy of the biopsy. For the other 110 patients who did not receive surgical treatment, the treatment response and the clinical course were used to evaluate the accuracy of the biopsy. The success rate, the diagnostic accuracy rate, the true positive/negative rate, and complications of the two groups were calculated and compared. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in sex, age, and lesion sites between the C‐arm guidance group (group 1) and the CT guidance group (group 2). There were no complications in the two groups. Pathological diagnoses were established in 232 of 238 biopsies. They revealed that 52 were primary malignant tumors, 12 were benign tumors, 70 were metastatic tumors, 4 were tuberculosis, and 94 were classified as “other.” The success rate of group 2 was higher than that of group 1, but it was not statistically significant (95.7% vs 100%; P = 0.098). According to the final diagnosis, the diagnostic accuracy rates were calculated and compared. There was no significant difference between the two groups (95.5% vs 96.9%; P = 0.835). The kappa coefficient was used to analyze the concordance between the histological pathologies of the biopsy and the final diagnosis in the two groups. The kappa values of the two group were 0.909 and 0.939, respectively. The results showed good consistency in both groups, but seemed better for group 2. CONCLUSION: CT‐guided core needle biopsy is a relatively safe and effective procedure for diagnosing spinal lesions with a high diagnostic accuracy rate and few complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6430454
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64304542019-09-10 Value of CT‐guided Core Needle Biopsy in Diagnosing Spinal Lesions: A Comparison Study Liang, Yun Liu, Peng Jiang, Li‐bo Wang, Hou‐lei Hu, An‐nan Zhou, Xiao‐gang Li, Xi‐lei Lin, Hong Wu, Dong Dong, Jian Orthop Surg Clinical Articles OBJECTIVE: A retrospective study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of CT‐guided core needle biopsy in diagnosing spinal lesions through comparison with C‐arm guidance. METHODS: From April 2013 to July 2017, a total of 188 patients, who suffered from spinal lesions or had malignant tumor history with a new spinal fracture, were included in this study. There were 96 men and 92 women, with an average of 57.1 years. A total of 238 core needle biopsies were performed. A total of 140 core needle biopsies were carried out under C‐arm guidance in 102 patients (group 1); 98 core needle biopsies were carried out under CT guidance in 86 patients (group 2); 108 core needle biopsies were performed in thoracic vertebrae, 116 were in lumbar vertebrae, and 14 were in sacral vertebrae. Seventy‐eight patients accepted surgical treatment after biopsies. For these patients, the histological pathologies of the biopsy and surgery were compared to evaluate the accuracy of the biopsy. For the other 110 patients who did not receive surgical treatment, the treatment response and the clinical course were used to evaluate the accuracy of the biopsy. The success rate, the diagnostic accuracy rate, the true positive/negative rate, and complications of the two groups were calculated and compared. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in sex, age, and lesion sites between the C‐arm guidance group (group 1) and the CT guidance group (group 2). There were no complications in the two groups. Pathological diagnoses were established in 232 of 238 biopsies. They revealed that 52 were primary malignant tumors, 12 were benign tumors, 70 were metastatic tumors, 4 were tuberculosis, and 94 were classified as “other.” The success rate of group 2 was higher than that of group 1, but it was not statistically significant (95.7% vs 100%; P = 0.098). According to the final diagnosis, the diagnostic accuracy rates were calculated and compared. There was no significant difference between the two groups (95.5% vs 96.9%; P = 0.835). The kappa coefficient was used to analyze the concordance between the histological pathologies of the biopsy and the final diagnosis in the two groups. The kappa values of the two group were 0.909 and 0.939, respectively. The results showed good consistency in both groups, but seemed better for group 2. CONCLUSION: CT‐guided core needle biopsy is a relatively safe and effective procedure for diagnosing spinal lesions with a high diagnostic accuracy rate and few complications. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2019-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6430454/ /pubmed/30767427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12418 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Chinese Orthopaedic Association and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Articles
Liang, Yun
Liu, Peng
Jiang, Li‐bo
Wang, Hou‐lei
Hu, An‐nan
Zhou, Xiao‐gang
Li, Xi‐lei
Lin, Hong
Wu, Dong
Dong, Jian
Value of CT‐guided Core Needle Biopsy in Diagnosing Spinal Lesions: A Comparison Study
title Value of CT‐guided Core Needle Biopsy in Diagnosing Spinal Lesions: A Comparison Study
title_full Value of CT‐guided Core Needle Biopsy in Diagnosing Spinal Lesions: A Comparison Study
title_fullStr Value of CT‐guided Core Needle Biopsy in Diagnosing Spinal Lesions: A Comparison Study
title_full_unstemmed Value of CT‐guided Core Needle Biopsy in Diagnosing Spinal Lesions: A Comparison Study
title_short Value of CT‐guided Core Needle Biopsy in Diagnosing Spinal Lesions: A Comparison Study
title_sort value of ct‐guided core needle biopsy in diagnosing spinal lesions: a comparison study
topic Clinical Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6430454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30767427
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12418
work_keys_str_mv AT liangyun valueofctguidedcoreneedlebiopsyindiagnosingspinallesionsacomparisonstudy
AT liupeng valueofctguidedcoreneedlebiopsyindiagnosingspinallesionsacomparisonstudy
AT jianglibo valueofctguidedcoreneedlebiopsyindiagnosingspinallesionsacomparisonstudy
AT wanghoulei valueofctguidedcoreneedlebiopsyindiagnosingspinallesionsacomparisonstudy
AT huannan valueofctguidedcoreneedlebiopsyindiagnosingspinallesionsacomparisonstudy
AT zhouxiaogang valueofctguidedcoreneedlebiopsyindiagnosingspinallesionsacomparisonstudy
AT lixilei valueofctguidedcoreneedlebiopsyindiagnosingspinallesionsacomparisonstudy
AT linhong valueofctguidedcoreneedlebiopsyindiagnosingspinallesionsacomparisonstudy
AT wudong valueofctguidedcoreneedlebiopsyindiagnosingspinallesionsacomparisonstudy
AT dongjian valueofctguidedcoreneedlebiopsyindiagnosingspinallesionsacomparisonstudy