Cargando…

Impact of Preoperative Diagnosis on Clinical Outcomes of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease in a Single‐institution Prospective Cohort

OBJECTIVES: Oblique lateral interbody fusion is considered a useful surgical option for various lumbar degenerative diseases with favorable clinical results and few complications. However, clinical outcomes following oblique lateral interbody fusion stratified according to the preoperative diagnosis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, Sam Yeol, Nam, Yunjin, Lee, Jeongik, Chang, Bong‐Soon, Lee, Choo‐Ki, Kim, Hyoungmin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6430477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30767389
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12419
_version_ 1783405779873693696
author Chang, Sam Yeol
Nam, Yunjin
Lee, Jeongik
Chang, Bong‐Soon
Lee, Choo‐Ki
Kim, Hyoungmin
author_facet Chang, Sam Yeol
Nam, Yunjin
Lee, Jeongik
Chang, Bong‐Soon
Lee, Choo‐Ki
Kim, Hyoungmin
author_sort Chang, Sam Yeol
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Oblique lateral interbody fusion is considered a useful surgical option for various lumbar degenerative diseases with favorable clinical results and few complications. However, clinical outcomes following oblique lateral interbody fusion stratified according to the preoperative diagnosis have not been fully evaluated in a large cohort. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes following oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease and to identify differences in outcomes when stratified according to preoperative diagnosis. METHODS: All patients receiving oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases were included in the current study and were stratified into four diagnostic groups: (i) degenerative spondylolisthesis; (ii) spondylolytic spondylolisthesis; (iii) spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis and instability; and (iv) deformity. Clinical outcomes were assessed using multiple patient‐reported questionnaires. Radiologic outcomes, including cage subsidence and completion of fusion, were also evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, 169 patients with 262 operative levels were included in the study. All clinical scoring items showed significant improvement at 1 year postoperatively for all diagnostic groups. Net and percent improvement, and a proportion of patients reaching a threshold for substantial clinical benefit were not significantly different between the diagnostic groups in all scoring items, except for lower extremity radiating pain of the deformity group. Although the deformity group had the highest overall complication rate, neurologic complications were more frequent in the spondylolytic spondylolisthesis group. The rate of complete fusion and cage subsidence for individual levels at 1 year postoperatively was 62.7% and 32.6% respectively, with no significant difference between the diagnostic groups. CONCLUSIONS: The large single‐institution prospective cohort of the present study showed favorable clinical outcomes following oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease, even in spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis and instability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6430477
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64304772019-09-10 Impact of Preoperative Diagnosis on Clinical Outcomes of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease in a Single‐institution Prospective Cohort Chang, Sam Yeol Nam, Yunjin Lee, Jeongik Chang, Bong‐Soon Lee, Choo‐Ki Kim, Hyoungmin Orthop Surg Clinical Articles OBJECTIVES: Oblique lateral interbody fusion is considered a useful surgical option for various lumbar degenerative diseases with favorable clinical results and few complications. However, clinical outcomes following oblique lateral interbody fusion stratified according to the preoperative diagnosis have not been fully evaluated in a large cohort. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes following oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease and to identify differences in outcomes when stratified according to preoperative diagnosis. METHODS: All patients receiving oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases were included in the current study and were stratified into four diagnostic groups: (i) degenerative spondylolisthesis; (ii) spondylolytic spondylolisthesis; (iii) spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis and instability; and (iv) deformity. Clinical outcomes were assessed using multiple patient‐reported questionnaires. Radiologic outcomes, including cage subsidence and completion of fusion, were also evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, 169 patients with 262 operative levels were included in the study. All clinical scoring items showed significant improvement at 1 year postoperatively for all diagnostic groups. Net and percent improvement, and a proportion of patients reaching a threshold for substantial clinical benefit were not significantly different between the diagnostic groups in all scoring items, except for lower extremity radiating pain of the deformity group. Although the deformity group had the highest overall complication rate, neurologic complications were more frequent in the spondylolytic spondylolisthesis group. The rate of complete fusion and cage subsidence for individual levels at 1 year postoperatively was 62.7% and 32.6% respectively, with no significant difference between the diagnostic groups. CONCLUSIONS: The large single‐institution prospective cohort of the present study showed favorable clinical outcomes following oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease, even in spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis and instability. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2019-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6430477/ /pubmed/30767389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12419 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Chinese Orthopaedic Association and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Articles
Chang, Sam Yeol
Nam, Yunjin
Lee, Jeongik
Chang, Bong‐Soon
Lee, Choo‐Ki
Kim, Hyoungmin
Impact of Preoperative Diagnosis on Clinical Outcomes of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease in a Single‐institution Prospective Cohort
title Impact of Preoperative Diagnosis on Clinical Outcomes of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease in a Single‐institution Prospective Cohort
title_full Impact of Preoperative Diagnosis on Clinical Outcomes of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease in a Single‐institution Prospective Cohort
title_fullStr Impact of Preoperative Diagnosis on Clinical Outcomes of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease in a Single‐institution Prospective Cohort
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Preoperative Diagnosis on Clinical Outcomes of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease in a Single‐institution Prospective Cohort
title_short Impact of Preoperative Diagnosis on Clinical Outcomes of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease in a Single‐institution Prospective Cohort
title_sort impact of preoperative diagnosis on clinical outcomes of oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease in a single‐institution prospective cohort
topic Clinical Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6430477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30767389
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12419
work_keys_str_mv AT changsamyeol impactofpreoperativediagnosisonclinicaloutcomesofobliquelateralinterbodyfusionforlumbardegenerativediseaseinasingleinstitutionprospectivecohort
AT namyunjin impactofpreoperativediagnosisonclinicaloutcomesofobliquelateralinterbodyfusionforlumbardegenerativediseaseinasingleinstitutionprospectivecohort
AT leejeongik impactofpreoperativediagnosisonclinicaloutcomesofobliquelateralinterbodyfusionforlumbardegenerativediseaseinasingleinstitutionprospectivecohort
AT changbongsoon impactofpreoperativediagnosisonclinicaloutcomesofobliquelateralinterbodyfusionforlumbardegenerativediseaseinasingleinstitutionprospectivecohort
AT leechooki impactofpreoperativediagnosisonclinicaloutcomesofobliquelateralinterbodyfusionforlumbardegenerativediseaseinasingleinstitutionprospectivecohort
AT kimhyoungmin impactofpreoperativediagnosisonclinicaloutcomesofobliquelateralinterbodyfusionforlumbardegenerativediseaseinasingleinstitutionprospectivecohort