Cargando…

Effects of hormonal contraceptive phase and progestin generation on stress-induced cortisol and progesterone release

The stress response differs between women using hormonal contraception and naturally cycling women. Yet, despite ample evidence showing that the stress response differs across the menstrual cycle in naturally cycling women, limited work has investigated whether the stress response differs across the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Herrera, Alexandra Ycaza, Faude, Sophia, Nielsen, Shawn E., Locke, Mallory, Mather, Mara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6430619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30937356
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ynstr.2019.100151
_version_ 1783405793815560192
author Herrera, Alexandra Ycaza
Faude, Sophia
Nielsen, Shawn E.
Locke, Mallory
Mather, Mara
author_facet Herrera, Alexandra Ycaza
Faude, Sophia
Nielsen, Shawn E.
Locke, Mallory
Mather, Mara
author_sort Herrera, Alexandra Ycaza
collection PubMed
description The stress response differs between women using hormonal contraception and naturally cycling women. Yet, despite ample evidence showing that the stress response differs across the menstrual cycle in naturally cycling women, limited work has investigated whether the stress response differs across the hormonal contraceptive cycle, during which synthetic hormones are taken most of the month but not all of it. To induce a stress response, women using hormonal contraception completed the cold pressor test during either the active phase, when hormones are present, or during the inactive phase, when hormones are not present. Saliva was collected and assayed for free cortisol and progesterone levels prior to stress onset, immediately after stress termination, and 15-min post stress onset. Free cortisol and progesterone increased to a similar degree across both hormonal contraceptive phases in response to the cold pressor test. Post-hoc investigation indicates that the progestin “generation” (classification of synthetic progestins based on the compounds they are derived from) can differentially affect the free steroid response to cold pressor test stress, with the largest effects observed in women using formulations containing second-generation progestins. These findings indicate that progestin generation, particularly second-generation progestins, may have a more impactful influence on the stress response than hormonal contraceptive cycle phase. Potential mechanisms driving this effect and need for additional research are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6430619
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64306192019-04-01 Effects of hormonal contraceptive phase and progestin generation on stress-induced cortisol and progesterone release Herrera, Alexandra Ycaza Faude, Sophia Nielsen, Shawn E. Locke, Mallory Mather, Mara Neurobiol Stress Original Research Article The stress response differs between women using hormonal contraception and naturally cycling women. Yet, despite ample evidence showing that the stress response differs across the menstrual cycle in naturally cycling women, limited work has investigated whether the stress response differs across the hormonal contraceptive cycle, during which synthetic hormones are taken most of the month but not all of it. To induce a stress response, women using hormonal contraception completed the cold pressor test during either the active phase, when hormones are present, or during the inactive phase, when hormones are not present. Saliva was collected and assayed for free cortisol and progesterone levels prior to stress onset, immediately after stress termination, and 15-min post stress onset. Free cortisol and progesterone increased to a similar degree across both hormonal contraceptive phases in response to the cold pressor test. Post-hoc investigation indicates that the progestin “generation” (classification of synthetic progestins based on the compounds they are derived from) can differentially affect the free steroid response to cold pressor test stress, with the largest effects observed in women using formulations containing second-generation progestins. These findings indicate that progestin generation, particularly second-generation progestins, may have a more impactful influence on the stress response than hormonal contraceptive cycle phase. Potential mechanisms driving this effect and need for additional research are discussed. Elsevier 2019-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6430619/ /pubmed/30937356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ynstr.2019.100151 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Herrera, Alexandra Ycaza
Faude, Sophia
Nielsen, Shawn E.
Locke, Mallory
Mather, Mara
Effects of hormonal contraceptive phase and progestin generation on stress-induced cortisol and progesterone release
title Effects of hormonal contraceptive phase and progestin generation on stress-induced cortisol and progesterone release
title_full Effects of hormonal contraceptive phase and progestin generation on stress-induced cortisol and progesterone release
title_fullStr Effects of hormonal contraceptive phase and progestin generation on stress-induced cortisol and progesterone release
title_full_unstemmed Effects of hormonal contraceptive phase and progestin generation on stress-induced cortisol and progesterone release
title_short Effects of hormonal contraceptive phase and progestin generation on stress-induced cortisol and progesterone release
title_sort effects of hormonal contraceptive phase and progestin generation on stress-induced cortisol and progesterone release
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6430619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30937356
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ynstr.2019.100151
work_keys_str_mv AT herreraalexandraycaza effectsofhormonalcontraceptivephaseandprogestingenerationonstressinducedcortisolandprogesteronerelease
AT faudesophia effectsofhormonalcontraceptivephaseandprogestingenerationonstressinducedcortisolandprogesteronerelease
AT nielsenshawne effectsofhormonalcontraceptivephaseandprogestingenerationonstressinducedcortisolandprogesteronerelease
AT lockemallory effectsofhormonalcontraceptivephaseandprogestingenerationonstressinducedcortisolandprogesteronerelease
AT mathermara effectsofhormonalcontraceptivephaseandprogestingenerationonstressinducedcortisolandprogesteronerelease