Cargando…
Effects of hormonal contraceptive phase and progestin generation on stress-induced cortisol and progesterone release
The stress response differs between women using hormonal contraception and naturally cycling women. Yet, despite ample evidence showing that the stress response differs across the menstrual cycle in naturally cycling women, limited work has investigated whether the stress response differs across the...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6430619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30937356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ynstr.2019.100151 |
_version_ | 1783405793815560192 |
---|---|
author | Herrera, Alexandra Ycaza Faude, Sophia Nielsen, Shawn E. Locke, Mallory Mather, Mara |
author_facet | Herrera, Alexandra Ycaza Faude, Sophia Nielsen, Shawn E. Locke, Mallory Mather, Mara |
author_sort | Herrera, Alexandra Ycaza |
collection | PubMed |
description | The stress response differs between women using hormonal contraception and naturally cycling women. Yet, despite ample evidence showing that the stress response differs across the menstrual cycle in naturally cycling women, limited work has investigated whether the stress response differs across the hormonal contraceptive cycle, during which synthetic hormones are taken most of the month but not all of it. To induce a stress response, women using hormonal contraception completed the cold pressor test during either the active phase, when hormones are present, or during the inactive phase, when hormones are not present. Saliva was collected and assayed for free cortisol and progesterone levels prior to stress onset, immediately after stress termination, and 15-min post stress onset. Free cortisol and progesterone increased to a similar degree across both hormonal contraceptive phases in response to the cold pressor test. Post-hoc investigation indicates that the progestin “generation” (classification of synthetic progestins based on the compounds they are derived from) can differentially affect the free steroid response to cold pressor test stress, with the largest effects observed in women using formulations containing second-generation progestins. These findings indicate that progestin generation, particularly second-generation progestins, may have a more impactful influence on the stress response than hormonal contraceptive cycle phase. Potential mechanisms driving this effect and need for additional research are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6430619 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64306192019-04-01 Effects of hormonal contraceptive phase and progestin generation on stress-induced cortisol and progesterone release Herrera, Alexandra Ycaza Faude, Sophia Nielsen, Shawn E. Locke, Mallory Mather, Mara Neurobiol Stress Original Research Article The stress response differs between women using hormonal contraception and naturally cycling women. Yet, despite ample evidence showing that the stress response differs across the menstrual cycle in naturally cycling women, limited work has investigated whether the stress response differs across the hormonal contraceptive cycle, during which synthetic hormones are taken most of the month but not all of it. To induce a stress response, women using hormonal contraception completed the cold pressor test during either the active phase, when hormones are present, or during the inactive phase, when hormones are not present. Saliva was collected and assayed for free cortisol and progesterone levels prior to stress onset, immediately after stress termination, and 15-min post stress onset. Free cortisol and progesterone increased to a similar degree across both hormonal contraceptive phases in response to the cold pressor test. Post-hoc investigation indicates that the progestin “generation” (classification of synthetic progestins based on the compounds they are derived from) can differentially affect the free steroid response to cold pressor test stress, with the largest effects observed in women using formulations containing second-generation progestins. These findings indicate that progestin generation, particularly second-generation progestins, may have a more impactful influence on the stress response than hormonal contraceptive cycle phase. Potential mechanisms driving this effect and need for additional research are discussed. Elsevier 2019-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6430619/ /pubmed/30937356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ynstr.2019.100151 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Herrera, Alexandra Ycaza Faude, Sophia Nielsen, Shawn E. Locke, Mallory Mather, Mara Effects of hormonal contraceptive phase and progestin generation on stress-induced cortisol and progesterone release |
title | Effects of hormonal contraceptive phase and progestin generation on stress-induced cortisol and progesterone release |
title_full | Effects of hormonal contraceptive phase and progestin generation on stress-induced cortisol and progesterone release |
title_fullStr | Effects of hormonal contraceptive phase and progestin generation on stress-induced cortisol and progesterone release |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of hormonal contraceptive phase and progestin generation on stress-induced cortisol and progesterone release |
title_short | Effects of hormonal contraceptive phase and progestin generation on stress-induced cortisol and progesterone release |
title_sort | effects of hormonal contraceptive phase and progestin generation on stress-induced cortisol and progesterone release |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6430619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30937356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ynstr.2019.100151 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT herreraalexandraycaza effectsofhormonalcontraceptivephaseandprogestingenerationonstressinducedcortisolandprogesteronerelease AT faudesophia effectsofhormonalcontraceptivephaseandprogestingenerationonstressinducedcortisolandprogesteronerelease AT nielsenshawne effectsofhormonalcontraceptivephaseandprogestingenerationonstressinducedcortisolandprogesteronerelease AT lockemallory effectsofhormonalcontraceptivephaseandprogestingenerationonstressinducedcortisolandprogesteronerelease AT mathermara effectsofhormonalcontraceptivephaseandprogestingenerationonstressinducedcortisolandprogesteronerelease |