Cargando…
The (cost) effectiveness of procedural sedation and analgesia versus general anaesthesia for hysteroscopic myomectomy, a multicentre randomised controlled trial: PROSECCO trial, a study protocol
BACKGROUND: In women with abnormal uterine bleeding, fibroids are a frequent finding. In case of heavy menstrual bleeding and presence of submucosal type 0–1 fibroids, hysteroscopic resection is the treatment of first choice, as removal of these fibroids is highly effective. Hysteroscopic myomectomy...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6431064/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30902087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-019-0742-1 |
_version_ | 1783405878837248000 |
---|---|
author | van der Meulen, Julia F. Bongers, Marlies Y. Coppus, Sjors F. P. J. Bosmans, Judith E. Maessen, José M. C. Oude Rengerink, Katrien Overdijk, Lucilla E. Radder, Celine M. van der Voet, Lucet F. Smeets, Nicol A. C. van Vliet, Huib A. A. M. Hehenkamp, Wouter J. K. Manger, Arentje P. Spaans, Wilbert A. Bakkum, Erica A. Horrée, Nicole Briët, Justine M. van der Steeg, Jan Willem Kok, Helen S. |
author_facet | van der Meulen, Julia F. Bongers, Marlies Y. Coppus, Sjors F. P. J. Bosmans, Judith E. Maessen, José M. C. Oude Rengerink, Katrien Overdijk, Lucilla E. Radder, Celine M. van der Voet, Lucet F. Smeets, Nicol A. C. van Vliet, Huib A. A. M. Hehenkamp, Wouter J. K. Manger, Arentje P. Spaans, Wilbert A. Bakkum, Erica A. Horrée, Nicole Briët, Justine M. van der Steeg, Jan Willem Kok, Helen S. |
author_sort | van der Meulen, Julia F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In women with abnormal uterine bleeding, fibroids are a frequent finding. In case of heavy menstrual bleeding and presence of submucosal type 0–1 fibroids, hysteroscopic resection is the treatment of first choice, as removal of these fibroids is highly effective. Hysteroscopic myomectomy is currently usually performed in the operating theatre. A considerable reduction in costs and a higher patient satisfaction are expected when procedural sedation and analgesia with propofol (PSA) in an outpatient setting is applied. However, both safety and effectiveness – including the necessity for re-intervention due to incomplete resection – have not yet been evaluated. METHODS: This study is a multicentre randomised controlled trial with a non-inferiority design and will be performed in the Netherlands. Women > 18 years with a maximum of 3 symptomatic type 0 or 1 submucosal fibroids with a maximum diameter of 3.5 cm are eligible to participate in the trial. After informed consent, 205 women will be randomised to either hysteroscopic myomectomy using procedural sedation and analgesia with propofol in an outpatient setting or hysteroscopic myomectomy using general anaesthesia in a clinical setting in the operating theatre. Primary outcome will be the percentage of complete resections, based on transvaginal ultrasonography 6 weeks postoperatively. Secondary outcomes are cost effectiveness, menstrual blood loss (Pictorial blood assessment chart), quality of life, pain, return to daily activities/work, hospitalization, (post) operative complications and re-interventions. Women will be followed up to one year after hysteroscopic myomectomy. DISCUSSION: This study may demonstrate comparable effectiveness of hysteroscopic myomectomy under procedural sedation and analgesia versus general anaesthesia in a safe and patient friendly environment, whilst achieving a significant cost reduction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch trial register, number NTR5357. Registered 11th of August 2015. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12905-019-0742-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6431064 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64310642019-04-04 The (cost) effectiveness of procedural sedation and analgesia versus general anaesthesia for hysteroscopic myomectomy, a multicentre randomised controlled trial: PROSECCO trial, a study protocol van der Meulen, Julia F. Bongers, Marlies Y. Coppus, Sjors F. P. J. Bosmans, Judith E. Maessen, José M. C. Oude Rengerink, Katrien Overdijk, Lucilla E. Radder, Celine M. van der Voet, Lucet F. Smeets, Nicol A. C. van Vliet, Huib A. A. M. Hehenkamp, Wouter J. K. Manger, Arentje P. Spaans, Wilbert A. Bakkum, Erica A. Horrée, Nicole Briët, Justine M. van der Steeg, Jan Willem Kok, Helen S. BMC Womens Health Study Protocol BACKGROUND: In women with abnormal uterine bleeding, fibroids are a frequent finding. In case of heavy menstrual bleeding and presence of submucosal type 0–1 fibroids, hysteroscopic resection is the treatment of first choice, as removal of these fibroids is highly effective. Hysteroscopic myomectomy is currently usually performed in the operating theatre. A considerable reduction in costs and a higher patient satisfaction are expected when procedural sedation and analgesia with propofol (PSA) in an outpatient setting is applied. However, both safety and effectiveness – including the necessity for re-intervention due to incomplete resection – have not yet been evaluated. METHODS: This study is a multicentre randomised controlled trial with a non-inferiority design and will be performed in the Netherlands. Women > 18 years with a maximum of 3 symptomatic type 0 or 1 submucosal fibroids with a maximum diameter of 3.5 cm are eligible to participate in the trial. After informed consent, 205 women will be randomised to either hysteroscopic myomectomy using procedural sedation and analgesia with propofol in an outpatient setting or hysteroscopic myomectomy using general anaesthesia in a clinical setting in the operating theatre. Primary outcome will be the percentage of complete resections, based on transvaginal ultrasonography 6 weeks postoperatively. Secondary outcomes are cost effectiveness, menstrual blood loss (Pictorial blood assessment chart), quality of life, pain, return to daily activities/work, hospitalization, (post) operative complications and re-interventions. Women will be followed up to one year after hysteroscopic myomectomy. DISCUSSION: This study may demonstrate comparable effectiveness of hysteroscopic myomectomy under procedural sedation and analgesia versus general anaesthesia in a safe and patient friendly environment, whilst achieving a significant cost reduction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch trial register, number NTR5357. Registered 11th of August 2015. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12905-019-0742-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6431064/ /pubmed/30902087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-019-0742-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol van der Meulen, Julia F. Bongers, Marlies Y. Coppus, Sjors F. P. J. Bosmans, Judith E. Maessen, José M. C. Oude Rengerink, Katrien Overdijk, Lucilla E. Radder, Celine M. van der Voet, Lucet F. Smeets, Nicol A. C. van Vliet, Huib A. A. M. Hehenkamp, Wouter J. K. Manger, Arentje P. Spaans, Wilbert A. Bakkum, Erica A. Horrée, Nicole Briët, Justine M. van der Steeg, Jan Willem Kok, Helen S. The (cost) effectiveness of procedural sedation and analgesia versus general anaesthesia for hysteroscopic myomectomy, a multicentre randomised controlled trial: PROSECCO trial, a study protocol |
title | The (cost) effectiveness of procedural sedation and analgesia versus general anaesthesia for hysteroscopic myomectomy, a multicentre randomised controlled trial: PROSECCO trial, a study protocol |
title_full | The (cost) effectiveness of procedural sedation and analgesia versus general anaesthesia for hysteroscopic myomectomy, a multicentre randomised controlled trial: PROSECCO trial, a study protocol |
title_fullStr | The (cost) effectiveness of procedural sedation and analgesia versus general anaesthesia for hysteroscopic myomectomy, a multicentre randomised controlled trial: PROSECCO trial, a study protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | The (cost) effectiveness of procedural sedation and analgesia versus general anaesthesia for hysteroscopic myomectomy, a multicentre randomised controlled trial: PROSECCO trial, a study protocol |
title_short | The (cost) effectiveness of procedural sedation and analgesia versus general anaesthesia for hysteroscopic myomectomy, a multicentre randomised controlled trial: PROSECCO trial, a study protocol |
title_sort | (cost) effectiveness of procedural sedation and analgesia versus general anaesthesia for hysteroscopic myomectomy, a multicentre randomised controlled trial: prosecco trial, a study protocol |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6431064/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30902087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-019-0742-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandermeulenjuliaf thecosteffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol AT bongersmarliesy thecosteffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol AT coppussjorsfpj thecosteffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol AT bosmansjudithe thecosteffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol AT maessenjosemc thecosteffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol AT ouderengerinkkatrien thecosteffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol AT overdijklucillae thecosteffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol AT raddercelinem thecosteffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol AT vandervoetlucetf thecosteffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol AT smeetsnicolac thecosteffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol AT vanvliethuibaam thecosteffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol AT hehenkampwouterjk thecosteffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol AT mangerarentjep thecosteffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol AT spaanswilberta thecosteffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol AT bakkumericaa thecosteffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol AT horreenicole thecosteffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol AT brietjustinem thecosteffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol AT vandersteegjanwillem thecosteffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol AT kokhelens thecosteffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol AT vandermeulenjuliaf costeffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol AT bongersmarliesy costeffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol AT coppussjorsfpj costeffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol AT bosmansjudithe costeffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol AT maessenjosemc costeffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol AT ouderengerinkkatrien costeffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol AT overdijklucillae costeffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol AT raddercelinem costeffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol AT vandervoetlucetf costeffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol AT smeetsnicolac costeffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol AT vanvliethuibaam costeffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol AT hehenkampwouterjk costeffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol AT mangerarentjep costeffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol AT spaanswilberta costeffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol AT bakkumericaa costeffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol AT horreenicole costeffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol AT brietjustinem costeffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol AT vandersteegjanwillem costeffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol AT kokhelens costeffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol |