Cargando…

The (cost) effectiveness of procedural sedation and analgesia versus general anaesthesia for hysteroscopic myomectomy, a multicentre randomised controlled trial: PROSECCO trial, a study protocol

BACKGROUND: In women with abnormal uterine bleeding, fibroids are a frequent finding. In case of heavy menstrual bleeding and presence of submucosal type 0–1 fibroids, hysteroscopic resection is the treatment of first choice, as removal of these fibroids is highly effective. Hysteroscopic myomectomy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Meulen, Julia F., Bongers, Marlies Y., Coppus, Sjors F. P. J., Bosmans, Judith E., Maessen, José M. C., Oude Rengerink, Katrien, Overdijk, Lucilla E., Radder, Celine M., van der Voet, Lucet F., Smeets, Nicol A. C., van Vliet, Huib A. A. M., Hehenkamp, Wouter J. K., Manger, Arentje P., Spaans, Wilbert A., Bakkum, Erica A., Horrée, Nicole, Briët, Justine M., van der Steeg, Jan Willem, Kok, Helen S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6431064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30902087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-019-0742-1
_version_ 1783405878837248000
author van der Meulen, Julia F.
Bongers, Marlies Y.
Coppus, Sjors F. P. J.
Bosmans, Judith E.
Maessen, José M. C.
Oude Rengerink, Katrien
Overdijk, Lucilla E.
Radder, Celine M.
van der Voet, Lucet F.
Smeets, Nicol A. C.
van Vliet, Huib A. A. M.
Hehenkamp, Wouter J. K.
Manger, Arentje P.
Spaans, Wilbert A.
Bakkum, Erica A.
Horrée, Nicole
Briët, Justine M.
van der Steeg, Jan Willem
Kok, Helen S.
author_facet van der Meulen, Julia F.
Bongers, Marlies Y.
Coppus, Sjors F. P. J.
Bosmans, Judith E.
Maessen, José M. C.
Oude Rengerink, Katrien
Overdijk, Lucilla E.
Radder, Celine M.
van der Voet, Lucet F.
Smeets, Nicol A. C.
van Vliet, Huib A. A. M.
Hehenkamp, Wouter J. K.
Manger, Arentje P.
Spaans, Wilbert A.
Bakkum, Erica A.
Horrée, Nicole
Briët, Justine M.
van der Steeg, Jan Willem
Kok, Helen S.
author_sort van der Meulen, Julia F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In women with abnormal uterine bleeding, fibroids are a frequent finding. In case of heavy menstrual bleeding and presence of submucosal type 0–1 fibroids, hysteroscopic resection is the treatment of first choice, as removal of these fibroids is highly effective. Hysteroscopic myomectomy is currently usually performed in the operating theatre. A considerable reduction in costs and a higher patient satisfaction are expected when procedural sedation and analgesia with propofol (PSA) in an outpatient setting is applied. However, both safety and effectiveness – including the necessity for re-intervention due to incomplete resection – have not yet been evaluated. METHODS: This study is a multicentre randomised controlled trial with a non-inferiority design and will be performed in the Netherlands. Women > 18 years with a maximum of 3 symptomatic type 0 or 1 submucosal fibroids with a maximum diameter of 3.5 cm are eligible to participate in the trial. After informed consent, 205 women will be randomised to either hysteroscopic myomectomy using procedural sedation and analgesia with propofol in an outpatient setting or hysteroscopic myomectomy using general anaesthesia in a clinical setting in the operating theatre. Primary outcome will be the percentage of complete resections, based on transvaginal ultrasonography 6 weeks postoperatively. Secondary outcomes are cost effectiveness, menstrual blood loss (Pictorial blood assessment chart), quality of life, pain, return to daily activities/work, hospitalization, (post) operative complications and re-interventions. Women will be followed up to one year after hysteroscopic myomectomy. DISCUSSION: This study may demonstrate comparable effectiveness of hysteroscopic myomectomy under procedural sedation and analgesia versus general anaesthesia in a safe and patient friendly environment, whilst achieving a significant cost reduction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch trial register, number NTR5357. Registered 11th of August 2015. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12905-019-0742-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6431064
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64310642019-04-04 The (cost) effectiveness of procedural sedation and analgesia versus general anaesthesia for hysteroscopic myomectomy, a multicentre randomised controlled trial: PROSECCO trial, a study protocol van der Meulen, Julia F. Bongers, Marlies Y. Coppus, Sjors F. P. J. Bosmans, Judith E. Maessen, José M. C. Oude Rengerink, Katrien Overdijk, Lucilla E. Radder, Celine M. van der Voet, Lucet F. Smeets, Nicol A. C. van Vliet, Huib A. A. M. Hehenkamp, Wouter J. K. Manger, Arentje P. Spaans, Wilbert A. Bakkum, Erica A. Horrée, Nicole Briët, Justine M. van der Steeg, Jan Willem Kok, Helen S. BMC Womens Health Study Protocol BACKGROUND: In women with abnormal uterine bleeding, fibroids are a frequent finding. In case of heavy menstrual bleeding and presence of submucosal type 0–1 fibroids, hysteroscopic resection is the treatment of first choice, as removal of these fibroids is highly effective. Hysteroscopic myomectomy is currently usually performed in the operating theatre. A considerable reduction in costs and a higher patient satisfaction are expected when procedural sedation and analgesia with propofol (PSA) in an outpatient setting is applied. However, both safety and effectiveness – including the necessity for re-intervention due to incomplete resection – have not yet been evaluated. METHODS: This study is a multicentre randomised controlled trial with a non-inferiority design and will be performed in the Netherlands. Women > 18 years with a maximum of 3 symptomatic type 0 or 1 submucosal fibroids with a maximum diameter of 3.5 cm are eligible to participate in the trial. After informed consent, 205 women will be randomised to either hysteroscopic myomectomy using procedural sedation and analgesia with propofol in an outpatient setting or hysteroscopic myomectomy using general anaesthesia in a clinical setting in the operating theatre. Primary outcome will be the percentage of complete resections, based on transvaginal ultrasonography 6 weeks postoperatively. Secondary outcomes are cost effectiveness, menstrual blood loss (Pictorial blood assessment chart), quality of life, pain, return to daily activities/work, hospitalization, (post) operative complications and re-interventions. Women will be followed up to one year after hysteroscopic myomectomy. DISCUSSION: This study may demonstrate comparable effectiveness of hysteroscopic myomectomy under procedural sedation and analgesia versus general anaesthesia in a safe and patient friendly environment, whilst achieving a significant cost reduction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch trial register, number NTR5357. Registered 11th of August 2015. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12905-019-0742-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6431064/ /pubmed/30902087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-019-0742-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
van der Meulen, Julia F.
Bongers, Marlies Y.
Coppus, Sjors F. P. J.
Bosmans, Judith E.
Maessen, José M. C.
Oude Rengerink, Katrien
Overdijk, Lucilla E.
Radder, Celine M.
van der Voet, Lucet F.
Smeets, Nicol A. C.
van Vliet, Huib A. A. M.
Hehenkamp, Wouter J. K.
Manger, Arentje P.
Spaans, Wilbert A.
Bakkum, Erica A.
Horrée, Nicole
Briët, Justine M.
van der Steeg, Jan Willem
Kok, Helen S.
The (cost) effectiveness of procedural sedation and analgesia versus general anaesthesia for hysteroscopic myomectomy, a multicentre randomised controlled trial: PROSECCO trial, a study protocol
title The (cost) effectiveness of procedural sedation and analgesia versus general anaesthesia for hysteroscopic myomectomy, a multicentre randomised controlled trial: PROSECCO trial, a study protocol
title_full The (cost) effectiveness of procedural sedation and analgesia versus general anaesthesia for hysteroscopic myomectomy, a multicentre randomised controlled trial: PROSECCO trial, a study protocol
title_fullStr The (cost) effectiveness of procedural sedation and analgesia versus general anaesthesia for hysteroscopic myomectomy, a multicentre randomised controlled trial: PROSECCO trial, a study protocol
title_full_unstemmed The (cost) effectiveness of procedural sedation and analgesia versus general anaesthesia for hysteroscopic myomectomy, a multicentre randomised controlled trial: PROSECCO trial, a study protocol
title_short The (cost) effectiveness of procedural sedation and analgesia versus general anaesthesia for hysteroscopic myomectomy, a multicentre randomised controlled trial: PROSECCO trial, a study protocol
title_sort (cost) effectiveness of procedural sedation and analgesia versus general anaesthesia for hysteroscopic myomectomy, a multicentre randomised controlled trial: prosecco trial, a study protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6431064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30902087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-019-0742-1
work_keys_str_mv AT vandermeulenjuliaf thecosteffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol
AT bongersmarliesy thecosteffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol
AT coppussjorsfpj thecosteffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol
AT bosmansjudithe thecosteffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol
AT maessenjosemc thecosteffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol
AT ouderengerinkkatrien thecosteffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol
AT overdijklucillae thecosteffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol
AT raddercelinem thecosteffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol
AT vandervoetlucetf thecosteffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol
AT smeetsnicolac thecosteffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol
AT vanvliethuibaam thecosteffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol
AT hehenkampwouterjk thecosteffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol
AT mangerarentjep thecosteffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol
AT spaanswilberta thecosteffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol
AT bakkumericaa thecosteffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol
AT horreenicole thecosteffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol
AT brietjustinem thecosteffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol
AT vandersteegjanwillem thecosteffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol
AT kokhelens thecosteffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol
AT vandermeulenjuliaf costeffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol
AT bongersmarliesy costeffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol
AT coppussjorsfpj costeffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol
AT bosmansjudithe costeffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol
AT maessenjosemc costeffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol
AT ouderengerinkkatrien costeffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol
AT overdijklucillae costeffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol
AT raddercelinem costeffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol
AT vandervoetlucetf costeffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol
AT smeetsnicolac costeffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol
AT vanvliethuibaam costeffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol
AT hehenkampwouterjk costeffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol
AT mangerarentjep costeffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol
AT spaanswilberta costeffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol
AT bakkumericaa costeffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol
AT horreenicole costeffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol
AT brietjustinem costeffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol
AT vandersteegjanwillem costeffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol
AT kokhelens costeffectivenessofproceduralsedationandanalgesiaversusgeneralanaesthesiaforhysteroscopicmyomectomyamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialproseccotrialastudyprotocol