Cargando…
Guideline Implementation in Standardized Office Workflows and Exam Types
Background: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) in medicine are recommendations supported by systematic review of evidence to facilitate optimal patient outcomes. Primary care practices are expected to implement more than 200 CPGs, overwhelming many practices. This qualitative study elucidated the p...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6431766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30900500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2150132719836898 |
_version_ | 1783405981292560384 |
---|---|
author | Dawson, Amy Henriksen, Brian Cortvriend, Penny |
author_facet | Dawson, Amy Henriksen, Brian Cortvriend, Penny |
author_sort | Dawson, Amy |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) in medicine are recommendations supported by systematic review of evidence to facilitate optimal patient outcomes. Primary care practices are expected to implement more than 200 CPGs, overwhelming many practices. This qualitative study elucidated the perspectives and priorities of family medicine physicians and office managers in grouping CPGs to facilitate implementation. Methods: A qualitative study was performed using individual, semistructured interviews. During the interviews the participants completed an open card-sort exercise grouping 20 CPGs. Purposive sampling was used to identify family medicine physicians and office managers practicing in medically underserved zip codes listed in the local medical society directory. Seven physicians and 6 office managers were interviewed. The interviews were transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis and compared with the card-sort results. Results: Thematic content analysis identified priorities and perspectives of office managers and physicians when grouping multiple CPGs for implementation: delegation, personalization, triggers, and change management. The card sort exercise revealed grouping by standardized preventive care visit, standardized rooming and discharge processes, and chronic illness. Chronic illness-based groupings and personalization of guidelines were recognized as presenting barriers to delegation of CPGs to the care team. Development of standardized preventive exams, standard rooming and discharge processes and chronic disease management were identified as promoting CPG adherence through team-based care. Standardized workflows provided opportunities for task delegation through predicable roles. Medicalization of CPG implementation relied heavily on the physician alone to remember to adhere to CPGs and inhibited task sharing by not giving office staff clear disease-based protocols to follow. Conclusions: This study identified priorities and perspectives of office managers and physicians when grouping multiple CPGs for concomitant implementation: delegation, personalization, triggers, and change management. Successful implementation was perceived to be associated with standardized preventive exams, standard rooming and discharge processes, and chronic disease management. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6431766 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64317662019-03-28 Guideline Implementation in Standardized Office Workflows and Exam Types Dawson, Amy Henriksen, Brian Cortvriend, Penny J Prim Care Community Health Original Research Background: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) in medicine are recommendations supported by systematic review of evidence to facilitate optimal patient outcomes. Primary care practices are expected to implement more than 200 CPGs, overwhelming many practices. This qualitative study elucidated the perspectives and priorities of family medicine physicians and office managers in grouping CPGs to facilitate implementation. Methods: A qualitative study was performed using individual, semistructured interviews. During the interviews the participants completed an open card-sort exercise grouping 20 CPGs. Purposive sampling was used to identify family medicine physicians and office managers practicing in medically underserved zip codes listed in the local medical society directory. Seven physicians and 6 office managers were interviewed. The interviews were transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis and compared with the card-sort results. Results: Thematic content analysis identified priorities and perspectives of office managers and physicians when grouping multiple CPGs for implementation: delegation, personalization, triggers, and change management. The card sort exercise revealed grouping by standardized preventive care visit, standardized rooming and discharge processes, and chronic illness. Chronic illness-based groupings and personalization of guidelines were recognized as presenting barriers to delegation of CPGs to the care team. Development of standardized preventive exams, standard rooming and discharge processes and chronic disease management were identified as promoting CPG adherence through team-based care. Standardized workflows provided opportunities for task delegation through predicable roles. Medicalization of CPG implementation relied heavily on the physician alone to remember to adhere to CPGs and inhibited task sharing by not giving office staff clear disease-based protocols to follow. Conclusions: This study identified priorities and perspectives of office managers and physicians when grouping multiple CPGs for concomitant implementation: delegation, personalization, triggers, and change management. Successful implementation was perceived to be associated with standardized preventive exams, standard rooming and discharge processes, and chronic disease management. SAGE Publications 2019-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6431766/ /pubmed/30900500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2150132719836898 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Dawson, Amy Henriksen, Brian Cortvriend, Penny Guideline Implementation in Standardized Office Workflows and Exam Types |
title | Guideline Implementation in Standardized Office Workflows and Exam Types |
title_full | Guideline Implementation in Standardized Office Workflows and Exam Types |
title_fullStr | Guideline Implementation in Standardized Office Workflows and Exam Types |
title_full_unstemmed | Guideline Implementation in Standardized Office Workflows and Exam Types |
title_short | Guideline Implementation in Standardized Office Workflows and Exam Types |
title_sort | guideline implementation in standardized office workflows and exam types |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6431766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30900500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2150132719836898 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dawsonamy guidelineimplementationinstandardizedofficeworkflowsandexamtypes AT henriksenbrian guidelineimplementationinstandardizedofficeworkflowsandexamtypes AT cortvriendpenny guidelineimplementationinstandardizedofficeworkflowsandexamtypes |