Cargando…

Guideline Implementation in Standardized Office Workflows and Exam Types

Background: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) in medicine are recommendations supported by systematic review of evidence to facilitate optimal patient outcomes. Primary care practices are expected to implement more than 200 CPGs, overwhelming many practices. This qualitative study elucidated the p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dawson, Amy, Henriksen, Brian, Cortvriend, Penny
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6431766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30900500
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2150132719836898
_version_ 1783405981292560384
author Dawson, Amy
Henriksen, Brian
Cortvriend, Penny
author_facet Dawson, Amy
Henriksen, Brian
Cortvriend, Penny
author_sort Dawson, Amy
collection PubMed
description Background: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) in medicine are recommendations supported by systematic review of evidence to facilitate optimal patient outcomes. Primary care practices are expected to implement more than 200 CPGs, overwhelming many practices. This qualitative study elucidated the perspectives and priorities of family medicine physicians and office managers in grouping CPGs to facilitate implementation. Methods: A qualitative study was performed using individual, semistructured interviews. During the interviews the participants completed an open card-sort exercise grouping 20 CPGs. Purposive sampling was used to identify family medicine physicians and office managers practicing in medically underserved zip codes listed in the local medical society directory. Seven physicians and 6 office managers were interviewed. The interviews were transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis and compared with the card-sort results. Results: Thematic content analysis identified priorities and perspectives of office managers and physicians when grouping multiple CPGs for implementation: delegation, personalization, triggers, and change management. The card sort exercise revealed grouping by standardized preventive care visit, standardized rooming and discharge processes, and chronic illness. Chronic illness-based groupings and personalization of guidelines were recognized as presenting barriers to delegation of CPGs to the care team. Development of standardized preventive exams, standard rooming and discharge processes and chronic disease management were identified as promoting CPG adherence through team-based care. Standardized workflows provided opportunities for task delegation through predicable roles. Medicalization of CPG implementation relied heavily on the physician alone to remember to adhere to CPGs and inhibited task sharing by not giving office staff clear disease-based protocols to follow. Conclusions: This study identified priorities and perspectives of office managers and physicians when grouping multiple CPGs for concomitant implementation: delegation, personalization, triggers, and change management. Successful implementation was perceived to be associated with standardized preventive exams, standard rooming and discharge processes, and chronic disease management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6431766
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64317662019-03-28 Guideline Implementation in Standardized Office Workflows and Exam Types Dawson, Amy Henriksen, Brian Cortvriend, Penny J Prim Care Community Health Original Research Background: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) in medicine are recommendations supported by systematic review of evidence to facilitate optimal patient outcomes. Primary care practices are expected to implement more than 200 CPGs, overwhelming many practices. This qualitative study elucidated the perspectives and priorities of family medicine physicians and office managers in grouping CPGs to facilitate implementation. Methods: A qualitative study was performed using individual, semistructured interviews. During the interviews the participants completed an open card-sort exercise grouping 20 CPGs. Purposive sampling was used to identify family medicine physicians and office managers practicing in medically underserved zip codes listed in the local medical society directory. Seven physicians and 6 office managers were interviewed. The interviews were transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis and compared with the card-sort results. Results: Thematic content analysis identified priorities and perspectives of office managers and physicians when grouping multiple CPGs for implementation: delegation, personalization, triggers, and change management. The card sort exercise revealed grouping by standardized preventive care visit, standardized rooming and discharge processes, and chronic illness. Chronic illness-based groupings and personalization of guidelines were recognized as presenting barriers to delegation of CPGs to the care team. Development of standardized preventive exams, standard rooming and discharge processes and chronic disease management were identified as promoting CPG adherence through team-based care. Standardized workflows provided opportunities for task delegation through predicable roles. Medicalization of CPG implementation relied heavily on the physician alone to remember to adhere to CPGs and inhibited task sharing by not giving office staff clear disease-based protocols to follow. Conclusions: This study identified priorities and perspectives of office managers and physicians when grouping multiple CPGs for concomitant implementation: delegation, personalization, triggers, and change management. Successful implementation was perceived to be associated with standardized preventive exams, standard rooming and discharge processes, and chronic disease management. SAGE Publications 2019-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6431766/ /pubmed/30900500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2150132719836898 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Dawson, Amy
Henriksen, Brian
Cortvriend, Penny
Guideline Implementation in Standardized Office Workflows and Exam Types
title Guideline Implementation in Standardized Office Workflows and Exam Types
title_full Guideline Implementation in Standardized Office Workflows and Exam Types
title_fullStr Guideline Implementation in Standardized Office Workflows and Exam Types
title_full_unstemmed Guideline Implementation in Standardized Office Workflows and Exam Types
title_short Guideline Implementation in Standardized Office Workflows and Exam Types
title_sort guideline implementation in standardized office workflows and exam types
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6431766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30900500
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2150132719836898
work_keys_str_mv AT dawsonamy guidelineimplementationinstandardizedofficeworkflowsandexamtypes
AT henriksenbrian guidelineimplementationinstandardizedofficeworkflowsandexamtypes
AT cortvriendpenny guidelineimplementationinstandardizedofficeworkflowsandexamtypes