Cargando…

Video Remote Interpreting Technology in Health Care: Cross-Sectional Study of Deaf Patients’ Experiences

BACKGROUND: The advent of new rehabilitation and assistive technologies has led to the creation of video remote interpreting (VRI) as an accessible communication technology for deaf patients. Although there has been a rapid growth in the use of VRI technology by health care providers, there is scant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kushalnagar, Poorna, Paludneviciene, Raylene, Kushalnagar, Raja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6431824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30855233
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/13233
_version_ 1783405993277784064
author Kushalnagar, Poorna
Paludneviciene, Raylene
Kushalnagar, Raja
author_facet Kushalnagar, Poorna
Paludneviciene, Raylene
Kushalnagar, Raja
author_sort Kushalnagar, Poorna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The advent of new rehabilitation and assistive technologies has led to the creation of video remote interpreting (VRI) as an accessible communication technology for deaf patients. Although there has been a rapid growth in the use of VRI technology by health care providers, there is scant published information on VRI users and their satisfaction. Current, timely data are needed to understand deaf patients’ use and satisfaction with the quality of VRI technology in health care settings. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the national trends of deaf patients’ satisfaction with the quality of video remote interpreting (VRI) in health settings and recommend actions to improve VRI quality and deaf patients’ satisfaction with VRI in health care settings. METHODS: Secondary data related to deaf adults’ experiences of using VRI service in a medical setting were obtained from the Health Information National Trends Survey in American Sign Language, which was administered to a US sample of deaf adults between 2016 and 2018. RESULTS: Among our VRI users (N=555, all in the United States) who answered questions about VRI usage in health between 2016 and 2018, only 41% were satisfied with the quality of the VRI technology service. Respondents with fewer years of education or those who were male were more likely to rate the VRI quality as acceptable. After adjusting for covariates in a binary regression analysis, deaf patients’ self-reported interference (ie, VRI interpreter’s interference with disclosure of health information) increased patient dissatisfaction with the quality of VRI technology service by three-fold. CONCLUSIONS: To increase satisfaction with VRI technology service in health care and rehabilitation settings among deaf patients, special attention needs to be given to video technology, as the use of sign language requires high-fidelity video for optimal communication between the interpreter and patient. To promote the willingness to disclose medical information through VRI among deaf patients, the interpreter must be highly skilled in both expressive and receptive communication and have the requisite background in medicine and rehabilitation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6431824
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64318242019-04-17 Video Remote Interpreting Technology in Health Care: Cross-Sectional Study of Deaf Patients’ Experiences Kushalnagar, Poorna Paludneviciene, Raylene Kushalnagar, Raja JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol Original Paper BACKGROUND: The advent of new rehabilitation and assistive technologies has led to the creation of video remote interpreting (VRI) as an accessible communication technology for deaf patients. Although there has been a rapid growth in the use of VRI technology by health care providers, there is scant published information on VRI users and their satisfaction. Current, timely data are needed to understand deaf patients’ use and satisfaction with the quality of VRI technology in health care settings. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the national trends of deaf patients’ satisfaction with the quality of video remote interpreting (VRI) in health settings and recommend actions to improve VRI quality and deaf patients’ satisfaction with VRI in health care settings. METHODS: Secondary data related to deaf adults’ experiences of using VRI service in a medical setting were obtained from the Health Information National Trends Survey in American Sign Language, which was administered to a US sample of deaf adults between 2016 and 2018. RESULTS: Among our VRI users (N=555, all in the United States) who answered questions about VRI usage in health between 2016 and 2018, only 41% were satisfied with the quality of the VRI technology service. Respondents with fewer years of education or those who were male were more likely to rate the VRI quality as acceptable. After adjusting for covariates in a binary regression analysis, deaf patients’ self-reported interference (ie, VRI interpreter’s interference with disclosure of health information) increased patient dissatisfaction with the quality of VRI technology service by three-fold. CONCLUSIONS: To increase satisfaction with VRI technology service in health care and rehabilitation settings among deaf patients, special attention needs to be given to video technology, as the use of sign language requires high-fidelity video for optimal communication between the interpreter and patient. To promote the willingness to disclose medical information through VRI among deaf patients, the interpreter must be highly skilled in both expressive and receptive communication and have the requisite background in medicine and rehabilitation. JMIR Publications 2019-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6431824/ /pubmed/30855233 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/13233 Text en ©Poorna Kushalnagar, Raylene Paludneviciene, Raja Kushalnagar. Originally published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology (http://rehab.jmir.org), 11.03.2019. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://rehab.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Kushalnagar, Poorna
Paludneviciene, Raylene
Kushalnagar, Raja
Video Remote Interpreting Technology in Health Care: Cross-Sectional Study of Deaf Patients’ Experiences
title Video Remote Interpreting Technology in Health Care: Cross-Sectional Study of Deaf Patients’ Experiences
title_full Video Remote Interpreting Technology in Health Care: Cross-Sectional Study of Deaf Patients’ Experiences
title_fullStr Video Remote Interpreting Technology in Health Care: Cross-Sectional Study of Deaf Patients’ Experiences
title_full_unstemmed Video Remote Interpreting Technology in Health Care: Cross-Sectional Study of Deaf Patients’ Experiences
title_short Video Remote Interpreting Technology in Health Care: Cross-Sectional Study of Deaf Patients’ Experiences
title_sort video remote interpreting technology in health care: cross-sectional study of deaf patients’ experiences
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6431824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30855233
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/13233
work_keys_str_mv AT kushalnagarpoorna videoremoteinterpretingtechnologyinhealthcarecrosssectionalstudyofdeafpatientsexperiences
AT paludnevicieneraylene videoremoteinterpretingtechnologyinhealthcarecrosssectionalstudyofdeafpatientsexperiences
AT kushalnagarraja videoremoteinterpretingtechnologyinhealthcarecrosssectionalstudyofdeafpatientsexperiences