Cargando…

Regulation of HIV self‐testing in Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe: a qualitative study with key stakeholders

INTRODUCTION: HIV self‐testing (HIVST) is being introduced as a new way for more undiagnosed people to know their HIV status. As countries start to implement HIVST, assuring the quality and regulating in vitro diagnostics, including HIVST, are essential. We aimed to document the emerging regulatory...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dacombe, Russell J, Watson, Victoria, Nyirenda, Lot, Madanhire, Claudius, Simwinga, Musonda, Chepuka, Lignet, Johnson, Cheryl C, Corbett, Elizabeth L, Hatzold, Karin, Taegtmeyer, Miriam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6432109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30907513
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25229
_version_ 1783406059455512576
author Dacombe, Russell J
Watson, Victoria
Nyirenda, Lot
Madanhire, Claudius
Simwinga, Musonda
Chepuka, Lignet
Johnson, Cheryl C
Corbett, Elizabeth L
Hatzold, Karin
Taegtmeyer, Miriam
author_facet Dacombe, Russell J
Watson, Victoria
Nyirenda, Lot
Madanhire, Claudius
Simwinga, Musonda
Chepuka, Lignet
Johnson, Cheryl C
Corbett, Elizabeth L
Hatzold, Karin
Taegtmeyer, Miriam
author_sort Dacombe, Russell J
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: HIV self‐testing (HIVST) is being introduced as a new way for more undiagnosed people to know their HIV status. As countries start to implement HIVST, assuring the quality and regulating in vitro diagnostics, including HIVST, are essential. We aimed to document the emerging regulatory landscape and perceptions of key stakeholders involved in HIVST policy and regulation prior to implementation in three low‐ and middle‐income countries. METHODS: Between April and August 2016, we conducted semi‐structured interviews in Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe to understand the relationships between different stakeholders on their perceptions of current and future HIVST regulation and the potential impact on implementation. We purposively sampled and interviewed 66 national‐level key stakeholders from the Ministry of Health and the regulatory, laboratory, logistical, donor and non‐governmental sectors. We used a thematic approach to analysis with an inductively developed common coding framework to allow inter‐country comparison of emerging themes. RESULTS: In all countries, the national reference laboratory was monitoring the quality of HIVST kits entering the public sector. In Malawi, there was no legal mandate to regulate medical devices, in Zambia one regulatory body with a clear mandate had started developing regulations and in Zimbabwe the mandate to regulate was overlapping between two bodies. Stakeholders indicated that they had a poor understanding of the process and requirements for HIVST regulation, as well as lack of clarity and coordination between organizational roles. The need for good collaboration between sectors, a strong post‐market surveillance model for HIVST and technical assistance to develop regulators capacity was noted as priorities. Key informants identified technical working groups as a potential way collaboration could be improved upon to accelerate the regulation of HIVST. CONCLUSION: Regulation of in vitro diagnostic devices, including HIVST, is now being recognized as important by regulators after a regional focus on pharmaceuticals. HIVST is providing an opportunity for each country to develop similar regulations to others in the region leading to a more coherent regulatory environment for the introduction of new devices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6432109
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64321092019-04-05 Regulation of HIV self‐testing in Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe: a qualitative study with key stakeholders Dacombe, Russell J Watson, Victoria Nyirenda, Lot Madanhire, Claudius Simwinga, Musonda Chepuka, Lignet Johnson, Cheryl C Corbett, Elizabeth L Hatzold, Karin Taegtmeyer, Miriam J Int AIDS Soc Research Articles INTRODUCTION: HIV self‐testing (HIVST) is being introduced as a new way for more undiagnosed people to know their HIV status. As countries start to implement HIVST, assuring the quality and regulating in vitro diagnostics, including HIVST, are essential. We aimed to document the emerging regulatory landscape and perceptions of key stakeholders involved in HIVST policy and regulation prior to implementation in three low‐ and middle‐income countries. METHODS: Between April and August 2016, we conducted semi‐structured interviews in Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe to understand the relationships between different stakeholders on their perceptions of current and future HIVST regulation and the potential impact on implementation. We purposively sampled and interviewed 66 national‐level key stakeholders from the Ministry of Health and the regulatory, laboratory, logistical, donor and non‐governmental sectors. We used a thematic approach to analysis with an inductively developed common coding framework to allow inter‐country comparison of emerging themes. RESULTS: In all countries, the national reference laboratory was monitoring the quality of HIVST kits entering the public sector. In Malawi, there was no legal mandate to regulate medical devices, in Zambia one regulatory body with a clear mandate had started developing regulations and in Zimbabwe the mandate to regulate was overlapping between two bodies. Stakeholders indicated that they had a poor understanding of the process and requirements for HIVST regulation, as well as lack of clarity and coordination between organizational roles. The need for good collaboration between sectors, a strong post‐market surveillance model for HIVST and technical assistance to develop regulators capacity was noted as priorities. Key informants identified technical working groups as a potential way collaboration could be improved upon to accelerate the regulation of HIVST. CONCLUSION: Regulation of in vitro diagnostic devices, including HIVST, is now being recognized as important by regulators after a regional focus on pharmaceuticals. HIVST is providing an opportunity for each country to develop similar regulations to others in the region leading to a more coherent regulatory environment for the introduction of new devices. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6432109/ /pubmed/30907513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25229 Text en © 2019 World Health Organization; licensed by IAS. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution IGO License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/legalcode which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited. In any reproduction of this article there should not be any suggestion that WHO or the article endorse any specific organization or products. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. This notice should be preserved along with the article’s URL.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Dacombe, Russell J
Watson, Victoria
Nyirenda, Lot
Madanhire, Claudius
Simwinga, Musonda
Chepuka, Lignet
Johnson, Cheryl C
Corbett, Elizabeth L
Hatzold, Karin
Taegtmeyer, Miriam
Regulation of HIV self‐testing in Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe: a qualitative study with key stakeholders
title Regulation of HIV self‐testing in Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe: a qualitative study with key stakeholders
title_full Regulation of HIV self‐testing in Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe: a qualitative study with key stakeholders
title_fullStr Regulation of HIV self‐testing in Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe: a qualitative study with key stakeholders
title_full_unstemmed Regulation of HIV self‐testing in Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe: a qualitative study with key stakeholders
title_short Regulation of HIV self‐testing in Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe: a qualitative study with key stakeholders
title_sort regulation of hiv self‐testing in malawi, zambia and zimbabwe: a qualitative study with key stakeholders
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6432109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30907513
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25229
work_keys_str_mv AT dacomberussellj regulationofhivselftestinginmalawizambiaandzimbabweaqualitativestudywithkeystakeholders
AT watsonvictoria regulationofhivselftestinginmalawizambiaandzimbabweaqualitativestudywithkeystakeholders
AT nyirendalot regulationofhivselftestinginmalawizambiaandzimbabweaqualitativestudywithkeystakeholders
AT madanhireclaudius regulationofhivselftestinginmalawizambiaandzimbabweaqualitativestudywithkeystakeholders
AT simwingamusonda regulationofhivselftestinginmalawizambiaandzimbabweaqualitativestudywithkeystakeholders
AT chepukalignet regulationofhivselftestinginmalawizambiaandzimbabweaqualitativestudywithkeystakeholders
AT johnsoncherylc regulationofhivselftestinginmalawizambiaandzimbabweaqualitativestudywithkeystakeholders
AT corbettelizabethl regulationofhivselftestinginmalawizambiaandzimbabweaqualitativestudywithkeystakeholders
AT hatzoldkarin regulationofhivselftestinginmalawizambiaandzimbabweaqualitativestudywithkeystakeholders
AT taegtmeyermiriam regulationofhivselftestinginmalawizambiaandzimbabweaqualitativestudywithkeystakeholders