Cargando…
Regulation of HIV self‐testing in Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe: a qualitative study with key stakeholders
INTRODUCTION: HIV self‐testing (HIVST) is being introduced as a new way for more undiagnosed people to know their HIV status. As countries start to implement HIVST, assuring the quality and regulating in vitro diagnostics, including HIVST, are essential. We aimed to document the emerging regulatory...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6432109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30907513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25229 |
_version_ | 1783406059455512576 |
---|---|
author | Dacombe, Russell J Watson, Victoria Nyirenda, Lot Madanhire, Claudius Simwinga, Musonda Chepuka, Lignet Johnson, Cheryl C Corbett, Elizabeth L Hatzold, Karin Taegtmeyer, Miriam |
author_facet | Dacombe, Russell J Watson, Victoria Nyirenda, Lot Madanhire, Claudius Simwinga, Musonda Chepuka, Lignet Johnson, Cheryl C Corbett, Elizabeth L Hatzold, Karin Taegtmeyer, Miriam |
author_sort | Dacombe, Russell J |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: HIV self‐testing (HIVST) is being introduced as a new way for more undiagnosed people to know their HIV status. As countries start to implement HIVST, assuring the quality and regulating in vitro diagnostics, including HIVST, are essential. We aimed to document the emerging regulatory landscape and perceptions of key stakeholders involved in HIVST policy and regulation prior to implementation in three low‐ and middle‐income countries. METHODS: Between April and August 2016, we conducted semi‐structured interviews in Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe to understand the relationships between different stakeholders on their perceptions of current and future HIVST regulation and the potential impact on implementation. We purposively sampled and interviewed 66 national‐level key stakeholders from the Ministry of Health and the regulatory, laboratory, logistical, donor and non‐governmental sectors. We used a thematic approach to analysis with an inductively developed common coding framework to allow inter‐country comparison of emerging themes. RESULTS: In all countries, the national reference laboratory was monitoring the quality of HIVST kits entering the public sector. In Malawi, there was no legal mandate to regulate medical devices, in Zambia one regulatory body with a clear mandate had started developing regulations and in Zimbabwe the mandate to regulate was overlapping between two bodies. Stakeholders indicated that they had a poor understanding of the process and requirements for HIVST regulation, as well as lack of clarity and coordination between organizational roles. The need for good collaboration between sectors, a strong post‐market surveillance model for HIVST and technical assistance to develop regulators capacity was noted as priorities. Key informants identified technical working groups as a potential way collaboration could be improved upon to accelerate the regulation of HIVST. CONCLUSION: Regulation of in vitro diagnostic devices, including HIVST, is now being recognized as important by regulators after a regional focus on pharmaceuticals. HIVST is providing an opportunity for each country to develop similar regulations to others in the region leading to a more coherent regulatory environment for the introduction of new devices. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6432109 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64321092019-04-05 Regulation of HIV self‐testing in Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe: a qualitative study with key stakeholders Dacombe, Russell J Watson, Victoria Nyirenda, Lot Madanhire, Claudius Simwinga, Musonda Chepuka, Lignet Johnson, Cheryl C Corbett, Elizabeth L Hatzold, Karin Taegtmeyer, Miriam J Int AIDS Soc Research Articles INTRODUCTION: HIV self‐testing (HIVST) is being introduced as a new way for more undiagnosed people to know their HIV status. As countries start to implement HIVST, assuring the quality and regulating in vitro diagnostics, including HIVST, are essential. We aimed to document the emerging regulatory landscape and perceptions of key stakeholders involved in HIVST policy and regulation prior to implementation in three low‐ and middle‐income countries. METHODS: Between April and August 2016, we conducted semi‐structured interviews in Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe to understand the relationships between different stakeholders on their perceptions of current and future HIVST regulation and the potential impact on implementation. We purposively sampled and interviewed 66 national‐level key stakeholders from the Ministry of Health and the regulatory, laboratory, logistical, donor and non‐governmental sectors. We used a thematic approach to analysis with an inductively developed common coding framework to allow inter‐country comparison of emerging themes. RESULTS: In all countries, the national reference laboratory was monitoring the quality of HIVST kits entering the public sector. In Malawi, there was no legal mandate to regulate medical devices, in Zambia one regulatory body with a clear mandate had started developing regulations and in Zimbabwe the mandate to regulate was overlapping between two bodies. Stakeholders indicated that they had a poor understanding of the process and requirements for HIVST regulation, as well as lack of clarity and coordination between organizational roles. The need for good collaboration between sectors, a strong post‐market surveillance model for HIVST and technical assistance to develop regulators capacity was noted as priorities. Key informants identified technical working groups as a potential way collaboration could be improved upon to accelerate the regulation of HIVST. CONCLUSION: Regulation of in vitro diagnostic devices, including HIVST, is now being recognized as important by regulators after a regional focus on pharmaceuticals. HIVST is providing an opportunity for each country to develop similar regulations to others in the region leading to a more coherent regulatory environment for the introduction of new devices. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6432109/ /pubmed/30907513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25229 Text en © 2019 World Health Organization; licensed by IAS. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution IGO License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/legalcode which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited. In any reproduction of this article there should not be any suggestion that WHO or the article endorse any specific organization or products. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. This notice should be preserved along with the article’s URL. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Dacombe, Russell J Watson, Victoria Nyirenda, Lot Madanhire, Claudius Simwinga, Musonda Chepuka, Lignet Johnson, Cheryl C Corbett, Elizabeth L Hatzold, Karin Taegtmeyer, Miriam Regulation of HIV self‐testing in Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe: a qualitative study with key stakeholders |
title | Regulation of HIV self‐testing in Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe: a qualitative study with key stakeholders |
title_full | Regulation of HIV self‐testing in Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe: a qualitative study with key stakeholders |
title_fullStr | Regulation of HIV self‐testing in Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe: a qualitative study with key stakeholders |
title_full_unstemmed | Regulation of HIV self‐testing in Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe: a qualitative study with key stakeholders |
title_short | Regulation of HIV self‐testing in Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe: a qualitative study with key stakeholders |
title_sort | regulation of hiv self‐testing in malawi, zambia and zimbabwe: a qualitative study with key stakeholders |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6432109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30907513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25229 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dacomberussellj regulationofhivselftestinginmalawizambiaandzimbabweaqualitativestudywithkeystakeholders AT watsonvictoria regulationofhivselftestinginmalawizambiaandzimbabweaqualitativestudywithkeystakeholders AT nyirendalot regulationofhivselftestinginmalawizambiaandzimbabweaqualitativestudywithkeystakeholders AT madanhireclaudius regulationofhivselftestinginmalawizambiaandzimbabweaqualitativestudywithkeystakeholders AT simwingamusonda regulationofhivselftestinginmalawizambiaandzimbabweaqualitativestudywithkeystakeholders AT chepukalignet regulationofhivselftestinginmalawizambiaandzimbabweaqualitativestudywithkeystakeholders AT johnsoncherylc regulationofhivselftestinginmalawizambiaandzimbabweaqualitativestudywithkeystakeholders AT corbettelizabethl regulationofhivselftestinginmalawizambiaandzimbabweaqualitativestudywithkeystakeholders AT hatzoldkarin regulationofhivselftestinginmalawizambiaandzimbabweaqualitativestudywithkeystakeholders AT taegtmeyermiriam regulationofhivselftestinginmalawizambiaandzimbabweaqualitativestudywithkeystakeholders |