Cargando…

Comparison of the Physical and Mechanical Properties of Resin Matrix with Two Photoinitiator Systems in Dental Adhesives

This study evaluated the physical and mechanical properties of resin matrices in dental adhesives with two photoinitiator systems. Resin matrix specimens were made with five different kinds of photoinitiators. Neat resin consisted of 60% 2,2-bis[4-2(2-hydroxy-3-methacryloxypropoxy)phenyl]propane (Bi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Mijoo, Suh, Byoung-In, Shin, Daehwan, Kim, Kwang-Mahn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6432356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30974526
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym8070250
_version_ 1783406116461346816
author Kim, Mijoo
Suh, Byoung-In
Shin, Daehwan
Kim, Kwang-Mahn
author_facet Kim, Mijoo
Suh, Byoung-In
Shin, Daehwan
Kim, Kwang-Mahn
author_sort Kim, Mijoo
collection PubMed
description This study evaluated the physical and mechanical properties of resin matrices in dental adhesives with two photoinitiator systems. Resin matrix specimens were made with five different kinds of photoinitiators. Neat resin consisted of 60% 2,2-bis[4-2(2-hydroxy-3-methacryloxypropoxy)phenyl]propane (Bis-GMA) and 40% hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) by weight, along with camphorquinone (CQ, 1 mol %) and additional components (1 mol % each) as follows: Group 1, 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate (DMAEMA); Group 2, ethyl-4-(dimethylamino) benzoate (EDMAB); Group 3, diphenyliodonium hexafluorphosphate (DPIHFP); Group 4, DMAEMA+DPIHFP; Group 5, EDMAB+DPIHFP. The degree of conversion (DC), flexural strength, flexural modulus, microhardness, and ultimate tensile strength were tested. The contribution of each photoinitiator to the DC in a selected group was analyzed with contour plots. One-way ANOVA and Tukey tests (p < 0.05) were used for statistical analyses. The DC of Groups 2, 4, and 5 was similar. The flexural strength was similar in all groups, but flexural modulus was significantly different. Group 3 had the lowest values for all physical and mechanical properties. Among all methods, the microhardness test revealed the greatest degree of difference among the five specimens. CQ, EDMAB, and DPIHFP were the most effective photoinitiators and CQ was the most influential factor for the DC rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6432356
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64323562019-04-02 Comparison of the Physical and Mechanical Properties of Resin Matrix with Two Photoinitiator Systems in Dental Adhesives Kim, Mijoo Suh, Byoung-In Shin, Daehwan Kim, Kwang-Mahn Polymers (Basel) Article This study evaluated the physical and mechanical properties of resin matrices in dental adhesives with two photoinitiator systems. Resin matrix specimens were made with five different kinds of photoinitiators. Neat resin consisted of 60% 2,2-bis[4-2(2-hydroxy-3-methacryloxypropoxy)phenyl]propane (Bis-GMA) and 40% hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) by weight, along with camphorquinone (CQ, 1 mol %) and additional components (1 mol % each) as follows: Group 1, 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate (DMAEMA); Group 2, ethyl-4-(dimethylamino) benzoate (EDMAB); Group 3, diphenyliodonium hexafluorphosphate (DPIHFP); Group 4, DMAEMA+DPIHFP; Group 5, EDMAB+DPIHFP. The degree of conversion (DC), flexural strength, flexural modulus, microhardness, and ultimate tensile strength were tested. The contribution of each photoinitiator to the DC in a selected group was analyzed with contour plots. One-way ANOVA and Tukey tests (p < 0.05) were used for statistical analyses. The DC of Groups 2, 4, and 5 was similar. The flexural strength was similar in all groups, but flexural modulus was significantly different. Group 3 had the lowest values for all physical and mechanical properties. Among all methods, the microhardness test revealed the greatest degree of difference among the five specimens. CQ, EDMAB, and DPIHFP were the most effective photoinitiators and CQ was the most influential factor for the DC rate. MDPI 2016-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6432356/ /pubmed/30974526 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym8070250 Text en © 2016 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kim, Mijoo
Suh, Byoung-In
Shin, Daehwan
Kim, Kwang-Mahn
Comparison of the Physical and Mechanical Properties of Resin Matrix with Two Photoinitiator Systems in Dental Adhesives
title Comparison of the Physical and Mechanical Properties of Resin Matrix with Two Photoinitiator Systems in Dental Adhesives
title_full Comparison of the Physical and Mechanical Properties of Resin Matrix with Two Photoinitiator Systems in Dental Adhesives
title_fullStr Comparison of the Physical and Mechanical Properties of Resin Matrix with Two Photoinitiator Systems in Dental Adhesives
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Physical and Mechanical Properties of Resin Matrix with Two Photoinitiator Systems in Dental Adhesives
title_short Comparison of the Physical and Mechanical Properties of Resin Matrix with Two Photoinitiator Systems in Dental Adhesives
title_sort comparison of the physical and mechanical properties of resin matrix with two photoinitiator systems in dental adhesives
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6432356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30974526
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym8070250
work_keys_str_mv AT kimmijoo comparisonofthephysicalandmechanicalpropertiesofresinmatrixwithtwophotoinitiatorsystemsindentaladhesives
AT suhbyoungin comparisonofthephysicalandmechanicalpropertiesofresinmatrixwithtwophotoinitiatorsystemsindentaladhesives
AT shindaehwan comparisonofthephysicalandmechanicalpropertiesofresinmatrixwithtwophotoinitiatorsystemsindentaladhesives
AT kimkwangmahn comparisonofthephysicalandmechanicalpropertiesofresinmatrixwithtwophotoinitiatorsystemsindentaladhesives