Cargando…

Efficiency of Air Bubble Removal in Preparation of Low-Profile Angioplasty Balloon Catheter: Bench-Top Comparison of Six Methods

PURPOSE: Complete removal of air bubbles from balloons for neurovascular angioplasty is cumbersome. We compared the preparation difficulty, air removal efficiency, and air collection pattern of six different balloon catheter preparation methods to propose a better preparation method for both initial...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Joon-Ho, Hwang, Seon Moon, Lee, Deok Hee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Interventional Neuroradiology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6433189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30613069
http://dx.doi.org/10.5469/neuroint.2018.01074
_version_ 1783406255641985024
author Choi, Joon-Ho
Hwang, Seon Moon
Lee, Deok Hee
author_facet Choi, Joon-Ho
Hwang, Seon Moon
Lee, Deok Hee
author_sort Choi, Joon-Ho
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Complete removal of air bubbles from balloons for neurovascular angioplasty is cumbersome. We compared the preparation difficulty, air removal efficiency, and air collection pattern of six different balloon catheter preparation methods to propose a better preparation method for both initial and second balloon uses, especially for small-profile angioplasty balloon catheters.Materials and METHODS: A total of 18 neurovascular angioplasty balloon catheters with nominal diameters of 2 mm were prepared to test six different preparation methods: the instruction for use method (method A), simplified method using a syringe (method B) and four newly devised preparation methods using inflating devices (methods C–F). Serial radiographs were obtained while the balloons were gradually inflated. We measured the time for each preparation and the bubble number, analyzed their distribution in the balloon, and calculated the contrast filling ratio (contrast filling area/total balloon area) for initial and second ballooning. The whole process was repeated three times. RESULTS: The preparation time varied widely (11.5 seconds [method D] to 73.3 seconds [method A]). On initial inflation, the contrast filling ratio at 8 atm was the highest (100%) with methods A and F. On second inflation, the ratio was again highest with method A (99.5%), followed by method F (99.2%). Initial ballooning tended to show a uniform pattern of single bubble in the distal segment of the balloon; in contrast, second ballooning showed varying patterns in which the bubbles were multiple and randomly distributed. CONCLUSION: None of the six methods were able to completely exclude air bubbles from the balloon catheters including the second ballooning; however, the method of repeating aspiration with high-volume inflating device (method F) could be a practical option considering the simplicity and efficiency of preparation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6433189
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Korean Society of Interventional Neuroradiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64331892019-04-02 Efficiency of Air Bubble Removal in Preparation of Low-Profile Angioplasty Balloon Catheter: Bench-Top Comparison of Six Methods Choi, Joon-Ho Hwang, Seon Moon Lee, Deok Hee Neurointervention Original Paper PURPOSE: Complete removal of air bubbles from balloons for neurovascular angioplasty is cumbersome. We compared the preparation difficulty, air removal efficiency, and air collection pattern of six different balloon catheter preparation methods to propose a better preparation method for both initial and second balloon uses, especially for small-profile angioplasty balloon catheters.Materials and METHODS: A total of 18 neurovascular angioplasty balloon catheters with nominal diameters of 2 mm were prepared to test six different preparation methods: the instruction for use method (method A), simplified method using a syringe (method B) and four newly devised preparation methods using inflating devices (methods C–F). Serial radiographs were obtained while the balloons were gradually inflated. We measured the time for each preparation and the bubble number, analyzed their distribution in the balloon, and calculated the contrast filling ratio (contrast filling area/total balloon area) for initial and second ballooning. The whole process was repeated three times. RESULTS: The preparation time varied widely (11.5 seconds [method D] to 73.3 seconds [method A]). On initial inflation, the contrast filling ratio at 8 atm was the highest (100%) with methods A and F. On second inflation, the ratio was again highest with method A (99.5%), followed by method F (99.2%). Initial ballooning tended to show a uniform pattern of single bubble in the distal segment of the balloon; in contrast, second ballooning showed varying patterns in which the bubbles were multiple and randomly distributed. CONCLUSION: None of the six methods were able to completely exclude air bubbles from the balloon catheters including the second ballooning; however, the method of repeating aspiration with high-volume inflating device (method F) could be a practical option considering the simplicity and efficiency of preparation. Korean Society of Interventional Neuroradiology 2019-03 2019-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6433189/ /pubmed/30613069 http://dx.doi.org/10.5469/neuroint.2018.01074 Text en Copyright © 2019 Korean Society of Interventional Neuroradiology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Choi, Joon-Ho
Hwang, Seon Moon
Lee, Deok Hee
Efficiency of Air Bubble Removal in Preparation of Low-Profile Angioplasty Balloon Catheter: Bench-Top Comparison of Six Methods
title Efficiency of Air Bubble Removal in Preparation of Low-Profile Angioplasty Balloon Catheter: Bench-Top Comparison of Six Methods
title_full Efficiency of Air Bubble Removal in Preparation of Low-Profile Angioplasty Balloon Catheter: Bench-Top Comparison of Six Methods
title_fullStr Efficiency of Air Bubble Removal in Preparation of Low-Profile Angioplasty Balloon Catheter: Bench-Top Comparison of Six Methods
title_full_unstemmed Efficiency of Air Bubble Removal in Preparation of Low-Profile Angioplasty Balloon Catheter: Bench-Top Comparison of Six Methods
title_short Efficiency of Air Bubble Removal in Preparation of Low-Profile Angioplasty Balloon Catheter: Bench-Top Comparison of Six Methods
title_sort efficiency of air bubble removal in preparation of low-profile angioplasty balloon catheter: bench-top comparison of six methods
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6433189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30613069
http://dx.doi.org/10.5469/neuroint.2018.01074
work_keys_str_mv AT choijoonho efficiencyofairbubbleremovalinpreparationoflowprofileangioplastyballooncatheterbenchtopcomparisonofsixmethods
AT hwangseonmoon efficiencyofairbubbleremovalinpreparationoflowprofileangioplastyballooncatheterbenchtopcomparisonofsixmethods
AT leedeokhee efficiencyofairbubbleremovalinpreparationoflowprofileangioplastyballooncatheterbenchtopcomparisonofsixmethods