Cargando…
Traffic symbol recognition modulates bodily actions
Traffic signals, i.e., iconic symbols conveying traffic rules, generally represent spatial or movement meanings, e.g., “Stop”, “Go”, “Bend warning”, or “No entry”, and we visually perceive these symbols and produce appropriate bodily actions. The traffic signals are clearly thought to assist in prod...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6433245/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30908546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214281 |
_version_ | 1783406267841118208 |
---|---|
author | Iriguchi, Mayuko Fujimura, Rumi Koda, Hiroki Masataka, Nobuo |
author_facet | Iriguchi, Mayuko Fujimura, Rumi Koda, Hiroki Masataka, Nobuo |
author_sort | Iriguchi, Mayuko |
collection | PubMed |
description | Traffic signals, i.e., iconic symbols conveying traffic rules, generally represent spatial or movement meanings, e.g., “Stop”, “Go”, “Bend warning”, or “No entry”, and we visually perceive these symbols and produce appropriate bodily actions. The traffic signals are clearly thought to assist in producing bodily actions such as going forward or stopping, and the combination of symbolic recognition through visual perception and production of bodily actions could be one example of embodied cognition. However, to what extent our bodily actions are associated with the symbolic representations of commonly used traffic signals remains unknown. Here we experimentally investigated how traffic symbol recognition cognitively affects bodily action patterns, by employing a simple stimulus-response task for traffic sign recognition with a response of either sliding or pushing down on a joystick in a gamepad. We found that when operating the joystick, participants’ slide reaction in response to the “Go” traffic symbol was significantly faster than their push reaction, while their response time to the “Stop” signal showed no differences between sliding and pushing actions. These results suggested that there was a possible association between certain action patterns and traffic symbol recognition, and in particular the “Go” symbol was congruent with a sliding action as a bodily response. Our findings may thus reveal an example of embodied cognition in visual perception of traffic signals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6433245 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64332452019-04-08 Traffic symbol recognition modulates bodily actions Iriguchi, Mayuko Fujimura, Rumi Koda, Hiroki Masataka, Nobuo PLoS One Research Article Traffic signals, i.e., iconic symbols conveying traffic rules, generally represent spatial or movement meanings, e.g., “Stop”, “Go”, “Bend warning”, or “No entry”, and we visually perceive these symbols and produce appropriate bodily actions. The traffic signals are clearly thought to assist in producing bodily actions such as going forward or stopping, and the combination of symbolic recognition through visual perception and production of bodily actions could be one example of embodied cognition. However, to what extent our bodily actions are associated with the symbolic representations of commonly used traffic signals remains unknown. Here we experimentally investigated how traffic symbol recognition cognitively affects bodily action patterns, by employing a simple stimulus-response task for traffic sign recognition with a response of either sliding or pushing down on a joystick in a gamepad. We found that when operating the joystick, participants’ slide reaction in response to the “Go” traffic symbol was significantly faster than their push reaction, while their response time to the “Stop” signal showed no differences between sliding and pushing actions. These results suggested that there was a possible association between certain action patterns and traffic symbol recognition, and in particular the “Go” symbol was congruent with a sliding action as a bodily response. Our findings may thus reveal an example of embodied cognition in visual perception of traffic signals. Public Library of Science 2019-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6433245/ /pubmed/30908546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214281 Text en © 2019 Iriguchi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Iriguchi, Mayuko Fujimura, Rumi Koda, Hiroki Masataka, Nobuo Traffic symbol recognition modulates bodily actions |
title | Traffic symbol recognition modulates bodily actions |
title_full | Traffic symbol recognition modulates bodily actions |
title_fullStr | Traffic symbol recognition modulates bodily actions |
title_full_unstemmed | Traffic symbol recognition modulates bodily actions |
title_short | Traffic symbol recognition modulates bodily actions |
title_sort | traffic symbol recognition modulates bodily actions |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6433245/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30908546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214281 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT iriguchimayuko trafficsymbolrecognitionmodulatesbodilyactions AT fujimurarumi trafficsymbolrecognitionmodulatesbodilyactions AT kodahiroki trafficsymbolrecognitionmodulatesbodilyactions AT masatakanobuo trafficsymbolrecognitionmodulatesbodilyactions |