Cargando…

Traffic symbol recognition modulates bodily actions

Traffic signals, i.e., iconic symbols conveying traffic rules, generally represent spatial or movement meanings, e.g., “Stop”, “Go”, “Bend warning”, or “No entry”, and we visually perceive these symbols and produce appropriate bodily actions. The traffic signals are clearly thought to assist in prod...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iriguchi, Mayuko, Fujimura, Rumi, Koda, Hiroki, Masataka, Nobuo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6433245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30908546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214281
_version_ 1783406267841118208
author Iriguchi, Mayuko
Fujimura, Rumi
Koda, Hiroki
Masataka, Nobuo
author_facet Iriguchi, Mayuko
Fujimura, Rumi
Koda, Hiroki
Masataka, Nobuo
author_sort Iriguchi, Mayuko
collection PubMed
description Traffic signals, i.e., iconic symbols conveying traffic rules, generally represent spatial or movement meanings, e.g., “Stop”, “Go”, “Bend warning”, or “No entry”, and we visually perceive these symbols and produce appropriate bodily actions. The traffic signals are clearly thought to assist in producing bodily actions such as going forward or stopping, and the combination of symbolic recognition through visual perception and production of bodily actions could be one example of embodied cognition. However, to what extent our bodily actions are associated with the symbolic representations of commonly used traffic signals remains unknown. Here we experimentally investigated how traffic symbol recognition cognitively affects bodily action patterns, by employing a simple stimulus-response task for traffic sign recognition with a response of either sliding or pushing down on a joystick in a gamepad. We found that when operating the joystick, participants’ slide reaction in response to the “Go” traffic symbol was significantly faster than their push reaction, while their response time to the “Stop” signal showed no differences between sliding and pushing actions. These results suggested that there was a possible association between certain action patterns and traffic symbol recognition, and in particular the “Go” symbol was congruent with a sliding action as a bodily response. Our findings may thus reveal an example of embodied cognition in visual perception of traffic signals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6433245
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64332452019-04-08 Traffic symbol recognition modulates bodily actions Iriguchi, Mayuko Fujimura, Rumi Koda, Hiroki Masataka, Nobuo PLoS One Research Article Traffic signals, i.e., iconic symbols conveying traffic rules, generally represent spatial or movement meanings, e.g., “Stop”, “Go”, “Bend warning”, or “No entry”, and we visually perceive these symbols and produce appropriate bodily actions. The traffic signals are clearly thought to assist in producing bodily actions such as going forward or stopping, and the combination of symbolic recognition through visual perception and production of bodily actions could be one example of embodied cognition. However, to what extent our bodily actions are associated with the symbolic representations of commonly used traffic signals remains unknown. Here we experimentally investigated how traffic symbol recognition cognitively affects bodily action patterns, by employing a simple stimulus-response task for traffic sign recognition with a response of either sliding or pushing down on a joystick in a gamepad. We found that when operating the joystick, participants’ slide reaction in response to the “Go” traffic symbol was significantly faster than their push reaction, while their response time to the “Stop” signal showed no differences between sliding and pushing actions. These results suggested that there was a possible association between certain action patterns and traffic symbol recognition, and in particular the “Go” symbol was congruent with a sliding action as a bodily response. Our findings may thus reveal an example of embodied cognition in visual perception of traffic signals. Public Library of Science 2019-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6433245/ /pubmed/30908546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214281 Text en © 2019 Iriguchi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Iriguchi, Mayuko
Fujimura, Rumi
Koda, Hiroki
Masataka, Nobuo
Traffic symbol recognition modulates bodily actions
title Traffic symbol recognition modulates bodily actions
title_full Traffic symbol recognition modulates bodily actions
title_fullStr Traffic symbol recognition modulates bodily actions
title_full_unstemmed Traffic symbol recognition modulates bodily actions
title_short Traffic symbol recognition modulates bodily actions
title_sort traffic symbol recognition modulates bodily actions
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6433245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30908546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214281
work_keys_str_mv AT iriguchimayuko trafficsymbolrecognitionmodulatesbodilyactions
AT fujimurarumi trafficsymbolrecognitionmodulatesbodilyactions
AT kodahiroki trafficsymbolrecognitionmodulatesbodilyactions
AT masatakanobuo trafficsymbolrecognitionmodulatesbodilyactions